Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T04:01:57.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Inferring the Direction of Option Trades

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Robert Savickas
Affiliation:
Savickas@gwu.edu, Department of Finance, 2023 G street, NW, George Washington Universtiy, DC 20052.
Arthur J. Wilson
Affiliation:
ajwl@gwn.edu, Department of Finance, 2023 G street, NW, George Washington Universtiy, DC 20052.

Abstract

To sign option trades as buys and sells, researchers often employ stock trade classification rules including the quote, the Lee and Ready (1991), the Ellis, Michaely, and O'Hara (2000), and the tick methods. Using a proprietary CBOE dataset that reports trade direction, we find that these four rules sign correctly 83%, 80%, 77%, and 59% of all classifiable trades, respectively. These rates are based on separate classifiable samples because each of the four rules fails to classify some trades (e.g., the quote rulecannot classify midspread trades). Outside-quote and reversed-quote trades are highly misclassified by all four rules. The probability of such trades is related to trading frequency, trade size, moneyness, and maturity. Underlying asset price changes around the time of the trade improve classification precision. We find that the components of index option complex trades not executed on the Retail Automated Execution System are misclassified almost 50% of the time by any method. The elimination of these trades (15% of the sample) results in a success rate of over 87% for the quote rule.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, F., and Scholes, M.. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabillities.” Journal Of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 627–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Y. H. and Engle, R. F.. “Modeling the Impacts of Market Activity on Bid-Ask Spreads in the Option Market.” Working paper 7331, NBER (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, J. Y.Salandro, D. and Shastri, K.On the Estimation of Bid-Ask Spreads: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23 (1988), 219230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easley, D.O'Hara, M. and Srinivas, P. S.Option Volume and Stock Prices: Evidence on where Informed Traders Trade.” Journal Of Finance, 53 (1998), 431465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, K.Michaely, R. and O'Hara, M.The Accuacy of Trade Classification Rules: Ecidence from Nasdaq.” Joural of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35 (2000), 529551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finucane, T. J.A Direct Test of Methods for Inferring Trade Direction from Intra-Day Data.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35 (2000), 553576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laux, P. A. and Senchack, A. J. Jr, “Bid-Ask Spreads in Financial Futures.” Jouranal of Futures Markets, 12 (1992),621634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. M. C. and Radhakrishna, B.. “inferring Investor Behavior: Evidence from TORQ Data.” Journal of Financial Markets, 3 (2000), 83111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. M. C. and Ready, M. J.Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 733746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odders-white, E. R.On the Occurrence and Consequences of Inaccurate Trade Classification.” Journal of Financial Markets, 3 (2000), 259286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. and Whaley, R. E.. “Estimating the Effective Bid/Ask Spread from time and Sales Data.” Journal Of Futures Markets, 14 (1994), 437455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G. H. K.Michalski, R. J.Jordan, J. V. and Moriarty, E.J.. “An Intraday Analysis of Bid-Ask Spreads and Price Volatility in the S&P 500 Index Futures Market.” Journal of Futures Markets, 14 (1994), 837859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. J.Option Trading around Ex-Dividend Dates.” Journal of Dervatives, 3 (1996), 4964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar