Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:47:23.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Peter Temin
Peter Temin
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are two views of the British Industrial Revolution in the literature today. The more traditional description sees the Industrial Revolution as a broad change in the British economy and society. This broad view of the Industrial Revolution has been challenged by Crafts and Harley who see the Industrial Revolution as the result of technical change in only a few industries. This article presents a test of these views using the Ricardian model of international trade with many goods. British trade data are used to implement the test and discriminate between the two views of the Industrial Revolution.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 63 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Robert. “Agriculture during the Industrial Revolution.” In The Economic History of Britain since 1700, Second edition, edited by Roderick, Floud and Donald, McCloskey, I, 96–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Ashton, T. S.An Economic History of England: The 18th Century. London: Methuen, 1955.Google Scholar
Ashton, T. S.The Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971 [1948].Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine. The Age of Manufactures: Industry, Innovation and Work in Britain, 1700–1820. Ottawa, NJ: Barnes and Noble, 1985.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine, and Hudson, Pat. “Rehabilitating the Industrial Revolution.” Economic History Review 45, no. 4 (1992): 24–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Rondo. A Concise Economic History of the World from Paleolithic Times to the Present, Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R.British Economic Growth during the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. “British Industrialization in an International Context.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 19, no. 3 (1989): 415–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. “Exogenous or Endogenous Growth? The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered.” Journal of Economic History 55, no. 4 (1995): 745–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R., and Harley, C. K.. “Output Growth and the Industrial Revolution: A Restatement of the Crafts–Harley View.” Economic History Review 45, no. 4 (1992): 703–30.Google Scholar
Davis, Ralph. The Industrial Revolution and British Overseas Trade. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Deane, Phyllis. The First Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Deane, Phyllis, and Cole, W. A.. British Economic Growth, 1688–1959. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Dodd, George. Days at the Factories. London: Charles Knight, 1843. Reprinted by Augustus, Kelley, 1967.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S. and Samuelson, P.. ”Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods.” American Economic Review 67, no. 5 (1977): 823–39.Google Scholar
Knick, Harley C.. “British Industrialization before 1841: Evidence of Slower Growth during the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History 42, no. 2 (1982): 267–89.Google Scholar
Knick, Harley C.. “Reassessing the Industrial Revolution: A Macro View.” In The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective, edited by Joel, Mokyr, 171–226. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
HartwellR, M. R, M.The Industrial Revolution and Economic Growth. London: Methuen, 1971.Google Scholar
Imlah, Albert. Economic Elements in the Pax Britannica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, David S.Prometheus Unbound: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Landes, David S.Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Matthias, Peter. The First Industrial Nation. London: Methuen, 1969.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. “The Industrial Revolution 1780–1860: A Survey.” In The Economic History of Britain since 1700, edited by Floud, R. C. and McCloskey, D. N., I, 103–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
McKendrick, Neil. “Josiah Wedgwood: An Eighteenth–Century Entrepreneur in Salesmanship and Marketing Techniques.” Economic History Review 12, no. 3 (1960): 408–24.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. “Editor’s Introduction: The New Economic History and the Industrial Revolution.” In The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective, edited by Mokyr, Joel, 1–131. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Patrick K.. “Introduction: Modem Conceptions of the Industrial Revolution.” In The Industrial Revolution and British Society, edited by O’Brien, K. and Roland, Quinault, 1–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piore, Michael, and Charles, Sabel. The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Free Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles, and Zeitlin, Jonathan. “Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets, and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization.” Past and Present 108, no. 1 (1985): 133–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin, Peter. Did Monetary Forces Cause the Great Depression? New York: Norton, 1976.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. House of Commons. “Finance Accounts: An Account of the Value of the Imports into and the Exports from Great Britain,” Parliamentary Papers 1812–1813 (100) Vol. 11. Pt. 1.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. House of Commons. “Finance Accounts: An Account of the Value of the Imports into and the Exports from Great Britain,” Parliamentary Papers 1818 (147) Vol. 12. Pt. 1.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. House of Commons. “Finance Accounts: An Account of the Value of the Imports into and the Exports from Great Britain,” Parliamentary Papers 1823 (146) Vol. 13. Pt. 1.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. House of Commons. “Finance Accounts: An Account of the Value of the Imports into and the Exports from Great Britain,” Parliamentary Papers 1828 (139) Vol. 16. Pt. 1.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. House of Commons. “Finance Accounts: An Account of the Value of the Imports into and the Exports from Great Britain,” Parliamentary Papers 1831–1832 (131) Vol. 26. Pt. 1.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. House of Commons. “Finance Accounts: An Account of the Value of the Imports into and the Exports from Great Britain,” Parliamentary Papers 1852 (196) Vol. 28. Pt. 1.Google Scholar