Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:31:05.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trade Wars: Canada's Reaction to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Judith A. McDonald
Affiliation:
Associate Professors of Economics at Lehigh University, 621 Taylor Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015-3117.
Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Affiliation:
Associate Professors of Economics at Lehigh University, 621 Taylor Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015-3117.
Colleen M. Callahan
Affiliation:
Associate Professors of Economics at Lehigh University, 621 Taylor Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015-3117.

Extract

Strange as it seems, the infamous Smoot-Hawley Tariff might have had an expansionary effect on the U.S. economy. Basic macroeconomic principles indicate that the direct effect of a tariff increase is expansionary. This expansionary effect might be offset by retaliatory increases in foreign tariffs. Barry Eichengreen has recently questioned whether significant retaliation to Smoot-Hawley occurred. This article demonstrates that the tariff increases enacted during 1930 in Canada—the largest trading partner of the United States—were in direct response to Smoot-Hawley. The conventional wisdom that Smoot-Hawley hurt the U.S. economy may be right after all.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Belsley, David, Kuh, Edwin, and Welsch, Roy. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: Wiley, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canada. Dominion Bureau of Statistics. Seventh Census of Canada, 1931. Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Ststistics (hereafter DBS), 1936.Google Scholar
Canada. Census of Manufactures, The Manufacturing Industries of Canada, 1932 Summary Report. Ottawa: DBS, 1935.Google Scholar
Canada. Department of Trade and Commerce. Condensed Preliminary Report on the Trade of Canada. Ottawa: DBS, various years.Google Scholar
Canada. Department of Trade and Commerce. Quarterly Report of Trade of Canada. Ottawa: DBS, 1930.Google Scholar
Canada. The Canada Year Book. Ottawa: DBS, varios years.Google Scholar
Canada. House of Commons. Dabates. Ottawa: DBS, varios years.Google Scholar
Canada. National Archives of Canada (NAC). Ottawa.Google Scholar
Dexter, Grant, and Stevenson, J.. “Canada's Tariff Reprisals Against American.” Current History, 34, no. 2 (1931): 208–13.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, Rudiger, and Fischer, Stanley. “The Open Economy: Implications for Monetary and Fiscal Policy.” In The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change, edited by Gordon, Robert J., 459501. NBER Studies in Business Cycles, vol. 25. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. “The Political Economy of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff.” In Research in Economic History vol. 12, edited by Ransom, Roger L., Sutch, Richard, and Carter, Susan B., 143. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Glassford, Larry A.Reaction and Reform: The Politics of the Conservative Party under R. B. Bennett, 1927–1938. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granatstein, J., and Hillmer, Norman. For Better or For Worse: Canada and the United States to the 1990s. Toronto: Copp Clark Pittman, 1991.Google Scholar
Hoover, Herbert. The Future of Our Foreign Trade. Washington, DC: GPO, 1926.Google Scholar
Hoover, Herbert. The Memoris of Herbert Hoover: The Cabinet and the Presidency, 1920–1933. New York: Macmillan, 1952.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard, and Percy, Michael. “Reciprocity, Imperial Sentiment, and Party Politics in the 1911 Election.Canadian Journal of Political Science 13, no. 4 (1980): 711–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Joseph. Tariff Retaliation; Repercussions of the Hawley-Smoot Bill. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Donald, and Holdsworth, Deryck, eds., Historical Atlas of Canada, vol. 3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Kottman, Richard. “Herbert Hoover and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff: Canada, A Case Study.” The Journal of American History 62, no. 3 (1975): 609–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDiarmid, Orville, Commercial Policy in the Canadian Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montreal Daily Star, various dates.Google Scholar
Montreal Gazette, 15 07 1930.Google Scholar
Neatby, Blair. William Lyon Mackenzie King: 1924–1932: The Lonely Heights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times, various dates.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. “How Efficient is the Voting Market?Journal of Law and Economics 33, no. 1 (1990): 2763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomfret, Richard, The Economic Development of Canada, 2nd edn.Scarborough, ON: Nelson Canada, 1993.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Howard. Canada Votes: A Handbook of Federal and Provincial Election Data. New Orleans: The Hauser Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Thompson, John Herd, and Seager, Allen. Canada, 1922–1939: Decades of Discord. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1985.Google Scholar
Toronto Globe, various dates.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Economic Analysis of Foreign Trade of the United States in Relation to the Tariff, Part. 1 Washington, DC: GPO 1933.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1938 Supplement to the Survey of Current Business. Washington, DC: GPO, 1938.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: GPO, 1976.Google Scholar
Urquhart, M. C., and Buckely, K. A. H., eds., Historical Statistics of Canada. Toronto: Macmillan, 1965.Google Scholar
Vancouver Daily Province, 3 07 1930.Google Scholar