Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:35:26.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Shafts to Wires: Historical Perspective on Electrification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Warren D. Devine Jr
Warren D. Devine Jr
Affiliation:
Institute for Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The shift from steam to electric power in manufacturing is recounted. Between 1880 and 1930 the production and distribution of mechanical power rapidly evolved from water and steam prime movers with shaft and belt drive systems to electric motors that drove individual machines. The use of electricity reduced the energy required to drive machinery, but more important, enabled industry to obtain greater output per unit of capital and labor input.Reduced energy needs and increased productivity in manufacturing influenced the relationship between energy consumption and gross national product in the first three decades of the twentieth century.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 347 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Day, Charles, “Discussion on the Individual Operation of Machine Tools by Electric Motors,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, 158 (11 1904), 321.Google Scholar

2 Passer, Harold C., The Electrical Manufacturers, 1875–1900 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1953), pp. 238–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 “New York Notes,” Electrical World, 9 (February 12, 1887), 82.Google Scholar

4 DuBoff, Richard B., “Electric Power in American Manufacturing 1889–1958” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1964), p. 228.Google Scholar

5 “Fine Printing Done by Electric Power,” Electrical World, 15 (1890), 432.Google Scholar

6 Bell, Louis, “Electricity as the Rival of Steam,” Electrical World, 17 (03 14, 1891), 212.Google Scholar

7 Ibid.

8 Passer, , Electrical Manufacturers, pp. 303–05.Google Scholar

9 Crocker, F. B., Benedikt, V. M., and Ormsbee, A. F., “Electric Power in Factories and Mills,” Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 12 (06 1895), 413–14.Google Scholar

10 Ibid.

11 Cornell, William B., Industrial Organization and Management (New York, 1928), pp. 382–84.Google Scholar

12 Mack, Richard S., personal communication (Central Washington University, Ellensburg, Washington, 1981). Mack is a former employee of a Maine shoe factory that used electric line shaft drive until 1962.Google Scholar

13 Spaulding, H. C., “Electric Power Distribution,” Power, 11 (12 1891), 12.Google Scholar

14 “Electrical Transmission of Power at the Edison Works in Schenectady,” Power, 12 (February 1892), 2.Google Scholar

15 Passer, , Electrical Manufacturers, pp. 303–05;Google Scholar“Electrical Power Transmission at Columbia, S.C.,” Electrical World, 23 (05 12, 1894), 656–57.Google Scholar

16 “Two Motor Driven Factories,” Power, 17 (March 1897), 12–13.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., p. 13.

18 “Electric Motors at the Ansonia Shops of the Farrel Foundry and Machine Co.” Power, 17 (August 1897), 13.Google Scholar

19 Crocker, , “Factories and Mills,” pp. 420–21.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., p. 417.

21 Passer, , Electrical Manufacturers, pp. 303–05;Google ScholarHussey, C. S., “Electricity in Mill Work,” Electrical World, 17 (05 9, 1891), 343.Google Scholar

22 Crocker, , “Factories and Mills,” pp. 415.Google Scholar

23 Hussey, , “Mill Work,” p. 343; “Electric Power for Isolated Factories,” Electrical World, 25 (February 16, 1895), 207; “Electricity for Machine Driving,” Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company (1898);Google ScholarDuBois, A. D., “Will It Pay to Electrify the Shops?”, Industrial Engineering and the Engineering Digest, 11 (01 1912), 6–7.Google Scholar

24 Crocker, , “Factories and Mills,” pp. 420–21.Google Scholar

25 Richmond, G., “Electric Power in Factories,” Engineering Magazine (January 1895);Google ScholarCrocker, F. B., “The Electric Distribution of Power in Workshops,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, 151 (01 1901), 2, 9;Google ScholarCampbell, G. M., “Machines Shop Practice,” American Machinist (January 25, 1906), 114;Google ScholarPenney, F. H., “Group Drive and Individually Motorized Drive,” Mechanical Engineering, 48 (09 1926), 890.Google Scholar

26 “Electricity for Machine Driving.”Google Scholar

27 “Electrical Transmission of Power,” p. 2; “Electricity in Industrial Plants,” Manufacturers' Record, 27 (July 19, 1895), 392–93;Google ScholarCrocker, , “Factories and Mills,” pp. 421–22.Google Scholar

28 Penney, , “Group Drive,” p. 890.Google Scholar

29 Day, , “Machine Tools,” p. 337.Google Scholar

30 Even so, until the 1920s the overall efficiency of providing mechanical power to machinery seldom exceeded about 12 percent—even with electric utility generation.Google Scholar

31 Penney, , “Group Drive,” p. 890.Google Scholar

32 DuBois, , “Will It Pay,” p. 9.Google Scholar

33 Crocker, , “Factories and Mills,” p. 414; DuBois, “Will It Pay,” p. 8; Crocker, “Electric Distribution of Power,” p. 2; Penney, “Group Drive,” p. 892.Google Scholar

34 In recent times energy has represented approximately three-quarters of the total cost of driving production machinery. See Reister, David B. and Devine, Warren D. Jr, “Total Costs of Energy Services,” Energy, 6 (1981), 305–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Crocker, , “Factories and Mills,” p. 427.Google Scholar

36 Crocker, , “Electric Distribution of Power,” p. 8.Google Scholar

37 Ibid., p. 9.

38 Ibid., pp. 6–7.

39 Ibid., p. 19.

40 Crocker, , “Factories and Mills,” p. 427.Google Scholar

41 Day, , “Machine Tools,” p. 337.Google Scholar

42 DuBois, , “Will It Pay,” p. 4.Google Scholar

43 Ibid.

44 Crocker, , “Factories and Mills,” pp. 429–30; “Electricity for Machine Driving;” DuBois, “Will It Pay,” p. 8; Crocker, “Electric Distribution of Power,” p. 4.Google Scholar

45 Fox, Gordon, Electric Drive Practice (New York, 1928), pp. 2, 8, 10;Google ScholarStiel, Wilhelm, Textile Electrification: A Treatise on the Application of Electricity in Textile Factories (London, 1933), pp. 111–16.Google Scholar

46 DuBois, , “Will It Pay,” p. 5.Google Scholar

47 Crocker, , “Electric Distribution of Power,” pp. 24–28.Google Scholar

48 Day, , “Machine Tools,” p. 431.Google Scholar

49 Bureau, U.S. of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Bicentennial Edition, Part 2, Series P 40–67 (Washington, D.C., 1975).Google Scholar

50 Crocker, , “Factories and Mills,” p. 428.Google Scholar

51 Stiel, , Textile Electrification, pp. 111–16.Google Scholar

52 Kapstein, Ethan B., “Industrial Power at Scovill Manufacturing Company: A Research Note” (Unpublished manuscript, Hardvard University, 1981).Google Scholar

53 Day, , “Machine Tools,” p. 348; Crocker, “Factories and Mills,” p. 411; Crocker, “Electric Distribution of Power,” p. 23.Google Scholar

54 Penney, , “Group Drive,” pp. 889, 969.Google Scholar

55 Cornell, , Industrial Organization, pp. 382–84; Fox, Electric Drive Practice, pp. 8, 355.Google Scholar

56 Crocker, , “Electric Distribution of Power,” p. 8.Google Scholar

57 Day, , “Machine Tools,” pp. 333, 338.Google Scholar

58 Ibid., p. 323.

59 Ibid., pp. 338–39.

60 Fox, , Electric Drive Practice, p. 82.Google Scholar

61 Passer, , Electrical Manufacturers, pp. 310–13.Google Scholar

62 Hughes, Thomas P., “The Electrification of America: The System Builders,” Technology and Culture, 20 (01 1979), 139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

63 Day, , “Machine Tools,” pp. 323–26, 340–41.Google Scholar

64 Miller, Raymond C., Kilowatts at Work: A History of the Detroit Edison Company (Detroit, Michigan, 1957), pp. 159–60.Google Scholar

65 Ibid.

66 Kapstein, , “Industrial Power”;Google ScholarAtack, Jeremy, “Fact in Fiction? The Relative Costs of Steam and Water Power: A Simulation Approach,” Explorations in Economic History, 16 (1979), 409–37;CrossRefGoogle ScholarAtack, Jeremy, Bateman, F., and Weiss, T., “The Regional Diffusion and Adoption of the Steam Engine in American Manufacturing,” this JOURNAL, 40 (06 1980), 281–308.Google Scholar