Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T03:46:16.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion of papers by George Dalton and Jeffrey G. Williamson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Eric E. Lampard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1965 , pp. 612 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Banton, Michael P., West African City: A Study of Tribal Life in Freetown (London: Oxford University Press, 1957), pp. 41–73Google Scholar. Also, Hoselitz, Bert F., “Generative and Parasitic Cities,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, III (Apr. 1955), pp. 278–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 For applications of the size-density model, see Hauser, Philip M. and Schnore, Leo F., eds., The Study of Urbanization (New York: Wiley, 1965), pp. 10–34Google Scholar.

3 For example in Perloff, Harvey S. et al. , Regions, Resources, and Economic Growth (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1960), pp. 111–18Google Scholar.

4 In this regard, see Warner, Sam B. Jr., “Innovation and the Industrialization of Philadelphia,” The Historian and the City, Oscar Handlin and John Burchard, eds., (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1963), pp. 63–69Google Scholar.