Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:05:58.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Avoiding Holdup: Asset Specificity and Technical Change in the Cuban Sugar Industry, 1899–1929

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Alan Dye
Affiliation:
Visiting Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1220, and the Universidad Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

Asset specificity can have profound influences on the economic structure of a country. An example is post-colonial Cuba. This article demonstrates that the existence of site specificity in assets generated problems of holdup for sugar mill owners in their contractual relations with cane suppliers. Recognition of that incentive structure offers an institutional explanation for the post-1900 concentration of U.S. investment in the eastern provinces. To reduce transaction costs, mill managers avoided investing in the western part of the island where the sugar industry was well established. A consequence was the relative decline of the western region.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alienes Urosa, Julian, Características fundamentales de la economía cubana (Havana, 1950).Google Scholar
Alston, Lee J., and Higgs, Robert, “Contractual Mix in Southern Agriculture since the Civil War,” this Journal, 42 (06 1982), pp. 327–52.Google Scholar
Bergad, Laird W., Cuban Rural Society in the Nineteenth Century: The Social and Economic History of Monoculture in Matanzas (Princeton, NJ, 1990).Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., The Visible Hand: the Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, MA, 1977).Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Scale and Scope: the Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, MA, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Steven. “Transaction Costs, Risk Aversion, and the Choice of Contractual Arrangements,” Journal of Law and Economics, 12 (04 1969), pp. 2342.Google Scholar
Commission on Cuban Affairs, Problems of the New Cuba (New York, 1935).Google Scholar
Cuba, República de, Secretaría de Agriculture, Comercio y Trabajo, Industria azucarera, Memoria de la zafra (Havana, 1916/19171930).Google Scholar
Cuba, Repúiblica de, Secretaría de Agriculture, Comercio y Trabajo, Portfolio azucarero, Industria azucarera de Cuba, 1912–14 (Havana, 1914).Google Scholar
Cuba, República de, Secretaría de Hacienda, Industria azucarera y sus derivados, (Havana, 1903/19041930).Google Scholar
David, Paul, “The Landscape and the Machine,” in Technical Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth (Cambridge, 1975), pp. 233–90.Google Scholar
Deerr, Noel, Cane Sugar: A Textbook on the Agriculture of the Sugar Cane, the Manufacture of Cane Sugar, and the Analysis of Sugar House Products (Manchester, 1911).Google Scholar
Deerr, Noel, The History of Sugar (London, 1950 and 1951), vols. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Dye, Alan, “Cane Contracting and Renegotiation: A Fixed Effects Analysis of the Adoption of New Technologies in the Cuban Sugar Industry, 1899–1929,” Explorations in Economic History, 31 (04 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, Alan, “Tropical Technology and Mass Production: The Expansion of Cuban Sugarmills, 1899–1929” (Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1991).Google Scholar
Ferrara, Orestes, Anuario estadístico de la Isla de Cuba, 1914 (Havana, 1915).Google Scholar
Fishback, Price V., Soft Coal, Hard Choices: The Economic Welfare of Bituminous Coal Miners, 1890–1930 (New York, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishback, Price V., “The Economics of Company Housing: Historical Perspectives from the Coal Fields,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 8 (Spring 1992), pp. 346–65.Google Scholar
Fraile Balbín, Pedro, Salvucci, Richard J., and Salvucci, Linda K., “El caso cubano: exportación e independencia,” in de la Escosura, Leandro Prados and Amaral, Samuel, eds., La independencia americana: consecuencias económicas (Madrid, 1993), pp. 80101.Google Scholar
Galloway, J. H., The Cane Sugar Industry: An Historical Geography from its Origins to 1914 (Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar
Guerra y Sánchez, Ramiro, Azúcar y población en las Antillas (3d ed., Havana, 1944; reprinted, Havana, 1970).Google Scholar
Hoernel, Robert B., “Sugar and Social Change in Oriente, Cuba, 1898–1946,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 8 (11 1976), pp. 215–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, Leland, Our Cuban Colony (New York, 1928).Google Scholar
Klein, Benjamin, Crawford, Robert G., and Alchian, Armen A., “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process, Journal of Law and Economics, 21 (10 1978), pp. 297326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, John A., On Sugar Cultivation in Louisiana, Cuba, &c., and the British Possessions (London, 1848).Google Scholar
Le Riverend, Julio, Historia económica de Cuba (Havana, 1971), vols. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Luzón, José Luis, Economía, población y territorio en Cuba (1899–1983), (Madrid, 1987).Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus, “Economic and Social Conditions in Latin America, 1913–1950,” in Urrutia, Miguel, ed., Long-term Trends in Latin American Economic Development (Washington D.C., 1991).Google Scholar
Maluquer de Motes Bernet, Jordi, “El mercado colonial antillano en el siglo XIX,” in Nadal, Jordi and Tortella, Gabriel, eds., Agricultura, comercio colonial y crecimiento económico en la España contempornea, Actas del Primer Coloquio de Historia Económico de España (Barcelona, 1972), pp. 322–59.Google Scholar
Martínez Alier, Juan, “The Cuban Sugar Cane Planters, 1934–1960,” Oxford Agrarian Studies, 2 (01 1974), pp. 135.Google Scholar
Martínez Alier, Juan and Verena, , Cuba: Economía y sociedad (Paris, 1972).Google Scholar
Maxwell, Francis, Economic Aspects of Cane Cultivation (London, 1927).Google Scholar
Moreno Fraginals, Manuel, El ingenio: el complejo económico social cubano del azúcar vol. 1 (1st edn., 1964; 2nd edn., Havana, 1978), vols. 2 and 3 (Havana, 1978).Google Scholar
Moreno Fraginals, Manuel, La historia como arma, y otros estudios sobre esclavos, ingenios y plantaciones (Barcelona, 1983).Google Scholar
Moreno Fraginals, Manuel, “Plantation Economies and Societies in the Spanish Caribbean, 1860–1930,” in Bethell, Leslie, ed., The Cambridge History of Latin America (Cambridge, 1986), vol. 7.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C., and Rosenberg, Nathan, Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth (Cambridge, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musoke, Moses Ṣ., and Olmstead, Alan L., “The Rise of the Cotton Industry in California: A Comparative Perspective,” this Journal, 42 (June 1982), pp. 385412.Google Scholar
Pérez, Louis A. Jr., Cuba Between Empires, 1878–1902 (Pittsburgh, PA, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Louis A. Jr., Cuba: Between Reform and Revolution (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Pérez, Louis A. Jr., Cuba Under the Platt Amendment (Pittsburgh, PA, 1986).Google Scholar
Pérez-López, Jorge F, The Economics of Cuban Sugar (Pittsburgh, PA, 1991).Google Scholar
Pezuela, Jacobo de la, Diccionario geográfico, estadístico e histórico de la isla de Cuba (Havana, 1863), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Pindyck, Robert, “Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment,” Journal of Economic Literature, 29 (09 1991), pp. 1110–48.Google Scholar
Pino Santos, Oscar, El asalto a Cuba por la oligarquía financiera yanqui (Havana, 1973).Google Scholar
Platt, D. C. M., Business Imperialism, 1840–1930: An Inquiry Based on British Experience in Latin America (Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
Prinsen Geerligs, H. C., Cane Sugar and its Manufacture (2nd ed., London, 1924).Google Scholar
Reid, Joseph D., “Sharecropping As an Understandable Market Response in the Post-Bellum South,” this Journal, 50 (03 1973), pp. 106–30.Google Scholar
Scott, Rebecca, Slave Emancipation in Cuba (Princeton, NJ 1985).Google Scholar
Scott, Rebecca, “The Transformation of Sugar Production in Cuba after Emancipation, 1880–1900,” in Albert, Bill and Graves, Adrian, eds., Crisis and Change in the International Sugar Economy, 1860–1914 (Norwich and Edinburgh, 1984), pp. 111–20.Google Scholar
Shlomowitz, Ralph, “Plantations and Smallholdings: Comparative Perspectives from the World Cotton and Sugar Cane Economies, 1865–1939,” Agricultural History, 58 (Winter 1984), pp. 116.Google Scholar
Stuckey, John A., Vertical Integration and Joint Ventures in the Aluminum Industry (Cambridge, MA, 1983).Google Scholar
Taussig, Frank W., The Tariff History of the United States (8th ed., New York, 1931).Google Scholar
United Nations, FAO, The World Sugar Economy in Figures: 1880–1959, Commodity Reference Series, No. 1 (1971).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, Miscellaneous Series, No. 53, “The Cane Sugar Industry: Agricultural, Manufacturing, and Marketing Costs in Hawaii, Porto Rico, Louisiana, and Cuba” (Washington D.C., 1917).Google Scholar
Whatley, Warren C., “Southern Agrarian Labor Contracts as Impediments to Cotton Mechanization,” this Journal, 48 (03 1987), pp. 4570.Google Scholar
Wilkins, Mira, The Emergence of Multinational Enterprise: American Business Abroad from the Colonial Era to 1914 (Cambridge, MA, 1970).Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E., “Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange,” American Economic Review, 73 (09 1983), pp. 519–40.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York, 1985).Google Scholar
Wright, Philip G., Sugar Production in Relation to the Tariff (New York, 1924).Google Scholar
Zanetti Lecuona, Oscar, “1929: La crisis mundial y la crisis cubana,” Santiago, 49 (03 1983), pp. 173–94.Google Scholar
Zanetti Lecuona, Oscar, and Alvarez, Alejandro García, Caminos para el azúicar (Havana, 1987).Google Scholar
Zanetti Lecuona, Oscar, and Alvarez, Alejandro García, eds., United Fruit Company: un caso del dominio imperialista en Cuba (Havana, 1976).Google Scholar