Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-72kh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T01:10:20.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The West India Sugar Crisis and British Slave Emancipation, 1830–1833

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Richard B. Sheridan
Richard B. Sheridan
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The West India sugar crisis of 1830–1832 dealt a shattering blow to an economy that was already in the grip of secular decline. Contributing to die decline were certain changes of a structural nature. In its heyday in the mid-eighteenth century, the British Caribbean economy was an important part of an international economy organized on the basis of imperial complementarity; it consisted of a base—the sugar colonies themselves—which was supported by three legs—the North American trade, the African trade and the British Isles trade. The base expanded geographically, largely as a consequence of military conquest, until fourteen Caribbean sugar colonies or groups of colonies were possessed by Great Britain in 1815. Moreover, the slave-plantation regime spread from colony to colony under a system of near-monoculture in the production of cane sugar.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 1961 , pp. 539 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Antigua, Barbados, British Guiana, Dominica, Grenada, Jamaica, Montserrat, Nevis, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Tobago, Trinidad, Virgin Islands.

2 “Report from Select Committee on the Commercial State of the West India Colonies,” Parl. Papers, 1831–32, CCCIVGoogle Scholar.

3 Ibid., pp.: 1–7, 15–16; “Statements, Calculations, etc., submitted to the Board of Trade, relating to the… British West India Colonies,” Parl. Papers, 1830–1831, IX, 556–59Google Scholar.

4 Dickson, William, Mitigation of Slavery (London, 1814), pp. 453–57Google Scholar.

5 Roberts, George, The Population of Jamaica (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1957), pp. 30–41, 165, 216–47Google Scholar.

6 “The West Indies, As They Were and Are,” Edinburgh Review, CIX (Apr. 1859), 428–29Google Scholar.

7 “Select Committee on West India Colonies,” p. 18.

8 Ibid., pp. 18, 220 (Aikin).

9 Public Record Office, London, Bankruptcy 3626-29, No. 44/32, Commission of William Manning, Frederick Manning and John Lavicount Anderdon, of New Bank Buildings, London, Sept. 5, 1831.

10 Oliver, Vere L. (ed.), Caribbeana, Being Miscellaneous Papers Relating to the…British West Indies (London: Mitchell, Hughes & Clarke, 1910), I, 241–45, 293–94Google Scholar.

11 Bankruptcy Comm., Messrs. Mannings and Anderdon, Depositions of Messrs. Smith, Payne and Smiths, I, Sept. 13, Dec. 21, 1831; II, March 28, 1832, April 12, 1834.

12 The Times, London, Aug. 3, 1831, “Money Market and City Intelligence.”

13 Bankruptcy Comm., Messrs. Mannings and Anderdon, I, Dec. 21, 1831; II, March 31, Sept. 5, 1831, June 2, 1832, April 12, 1834; III, March 11, July 13, 1836.

14 Ibid., I, Dec. 21, 1831; II, Dec. 5, 1831.

15 Marshall, Alfred, Principles of Economics (8th ed.; London: Macmillan and Co., 1947), p. 1Google Scholar.

16 Barrow, John B. (ed.), The Mirror of Parliament, lst Sess., IIth Parl. (London, 1833), II, 2077Google Scholar.

17 Williams, Eric, Capitalism and Slavery (Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1944), PP. 135–53Google Scholar.

18 , Barrow, Mirror of Parliament, III, 2150Google Scholar(Hume), 2193 (Marryatt).

19 Klingberg, Frank J., The Anti-Slavery Movement in England (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1926), pp. 284–85Google Scholar.

20 , Barrow, Mirror of Parliament, III, 2167Google Scholar(P. M. Stewart).

21 Ibid., p. 2203.

22 , Klingberg, The Anti-Slavery Movement in England, pp. 293–302Google Scholar.

23 Deerr, Noel, The History of Sugar (London: Chapman and Hall, 1950), II, 305–6;Google ScholarBurn, W. L., Emancipation and Apprenticeship in the British West Indies (London: Jonathan Cape, 1937). P 116. n. 5Google Scholar.

24 Pares, Richard, A West-India Fortune (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1950), pp. 293–321Google Scholar.

25 Pares, Richard, Merchants and Planters, Ec. Hist. Rev. Supplement No. 4 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1960), p. 49Google Scholar; , Williams, Capitalism and Slavery, pp. 43–44, 62, 74-75, 88, 90, 94, 105Google Scholar.

26 Nevile Reid and John Dixon, assignees of the bankrupt's estate, received compensation amounting to £22,426 3s. 3d. for 1,490 slaves. James William Freshfield and John Beadnell, trustees for Messrs. Smith, Payne and Smiths, received £11,595 5s. 9d. for 533 slaves. Of the total of 2,023 slaves and £34,021 9s. od. compensation, 1,263 and £20,651 16s. 11d. were St. Kitts awards respectively. Part. Papers, 1837-1838, XLVIII, 92, 163, 309-14, 470Google Scholar.

27 Wakefield, Edward Gibbon, England and America. A Comparison of the Social and Political State of Both Nations (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1834), pp. 209–12Google Scholar.

28 Conrad, Alfred H. and Meyer, John R., “The Economics of Slavery in the Ante Bellum South,” J. Pol. Ec, LXVI, No. 2 (Apr. 1958), 95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 , Wakefield, England and America, pp. 212–15, 219-23Google Scholar; Wakefield, E. G., A View of the Art of Colonization (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914), pp. 175–80Google Scholar.

30 Barnes, Gilbert H., The Antislavery Impulse 1830-1844 (New York: D. Appleton-Century Co., 1933), pp. 29–37, 52-53Google Scholar; Thistlethwaite, Frank, “Atlantic Partnership,” Ec. Hist. Rev., 2nd Ser., VII, No. I (Aug. 1954), 9–13Google Scholar.

31 Early, Jubal A., The Heritage of the South, A History of … Slavery … (Lynchburg, Virginia: Press of Brown-Morrison Co., 1915), pp. 69–71Google Scholar.