¹ Jensen, Merrill, The New Nation. X History of the United States during the Confederation, 1781-1789 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1950).Google Scholar

² Ibid., p. 139.

³ American Museum, December 1787, p. 601.Google Scholar

⁴ Fiske, John, The Critical Period of American History, 1783-1189 (Boston: Houghton MifBin and Company, 1902), pp. 172-75Google Scholar; McMaster, John B., A History of ike People of the United Stales from the Revolution to the Civil War, 8 vols. (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1883-1913), I, 404Google Scholar.

⁵ Channing, Edward, A History of the United States, 6 vols. (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1905-1926), III, 467–68.Google Scholar

⁶ Nevins, Allan, The American States during and after the Revolution, 1775-1789 (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1924), p. 500Google Scholar; Spaulding, E. Wilder, New York, in the Critical Period, 1783-1789 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1932), pp. 154–55Google Scholar.

⁷ , Spaulding, New York, in the Critical Period, p. 156Google Scholar; Hunter, William C, The Commercial Policy of New Jersey Under the Confederation, 1783-1789 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1922), pp. 25–31;Google ScholarCochran, Thomas C, New York, in the Confederation: An Economic Study (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1932), pp. 167n, 168nCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁸ McCormick, Richard, Experiment in Independence: New Jersey in the Critical Period, 1781-1789 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1950), p. 120.Google Scholar

⁹ , McCormick, Experiment in Independence, pp. 120–21. He refers to Channing and the New Jersey retaliatory statute. See also Nevins' explanation of the law.—Google Scholar, Nevins, American States, pp. 561–62Google Scholar.

¹⁰ November 18, 1784, Laws of New York, 1784-1788, c 6.Google Scholar

¹¹ 04 11, 1787, Laws of New York, 1784-1788, c. 81.Google Scholar

¹² The Connecticut legislature did nothing, but some New London merchants banded together in a league and agreed not to trade with New York in any commodities under a possible penalty of fifty pounds. This was to be valid for one year, but it was not very effective. It was an easy matter for the New Yorkers to get their commodities elsewhere.—Pennsylvania Gazette, June 27, 1787.

¹³ Bancroft, George, History of the Formation of the Constitution of the United States of America (New York: D. Applcton and Company, 1896), pp. 187–88;Google ScholarLee, Francis B., New Jersey as a Colony and as a State, 4 vols. (New York: The Publishing Society of New Jersey, 1902), II, 373. New Jersey had been asked to contribute $165,000Google Scholar.

¹⁴ Schuyler to Henry van Schaack, March 13, 1787, in Schaack, Henry van, Memoirs of Henry van Schaack, Embracing Sections of His Correspondence (Chicago: A. C. McClurg & Company, 1892), p. 152Google Scholar.

¹⁵ Johnston, Henry P., ed., The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay, 4 vols. (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1890-1893), III, 316. This was an address to the people of New York written in 1788 urging them to adopt the new constitution. McLaughlin said that about one half the goods received in Connecticut, New Jersey, and western Massachusetts were brought in through New York, which might explain why these states were so interested in what she did with her tariff system.—Google ScholarMcLaughlin, Andrew, The Confederation and the Constitution, 1783-17S9, 27 vols. The American Nation: A History (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1904-1908), X, 305–6Google Scholar.

¹⁶ , Nevins, American States, p. 561.Google Scholar

¹⁷ 03 13, 1788, Laws of New York, 1784-1788, c. 72.Google Scholar