Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T18:47:07.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Business Attitudes Toward European Immigration, 1880-1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Morrell Heald
Affiliation:
New Haven

Extract

Tradition depicts American business as the chiefexploiter of our national free immigration policy during the latter defender andhalf of the nineteenth century. The contribution of immigrant labor to the building of the American industrial empire is much discussed. The interest of employers in recruiting cheap labor and strikebreakers from Europe is a familiar story. That industrialists and their allies in the years of rapid expansion and mechanization of the American economy stood to gain as much as any other group, even including the aliens themselves, from the maintenance of large-scale immigration has appeared so obvious as to demand little careful investigation. Historians have ordinarily described the succession of laws after 1882, gradually narrowing the “open door” the United States offered to Europe and pulling in the welcome mat as well, as a series of labor and nativist victories in the face of dogged resistance by the business world. Yet such an interpretation fails to explain the fact that the period which saw the growth of strong anti-immigrant feeling among native workers witnessed a strikingly similar development in the ranks of businessmen. During the 1880's and 1890's, while labor leaders protested the competition of alien workers, business publications were criticizing no less bitterly the impact of immigration upon American society. When nativists sought financial support for their efforts to restrict immigration they found many businessmen in sympathy with their aims. Measures presented to Congress for regulating and limiting the admission of aliens were frequently concurred in by prominent business leaders. Indeed, a notable development in American business thought after 1880 was the rise of hostility toward the swarms of cheap foreign laborers which employers had long considered essential to their own, and the nation's, prosperity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 51st Cong., 2nd Sess., H. R. Reports, No. 3472, pp. 669 ff.

2 American Bankers' Association, Proceedings at the Annual Convention, 1888, p. 18Google Scholar.

3 Second Biennial Report of the Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics, of Wisconsin, 1885-1886 (Madison, 1886), pp. xxv, 416–22Google Scholar; Bankers' Magazine, XLII (09 1887), 180Google Scholar.

4 National Board of Trade, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 1893, pp. 6768Google Scholar; 1894, pp. 51, 56-89, 131-46, 242.

5 Reports of the United States Industrial Commission (Washington, 1901), XV, 6870Google Scholar.

6 Age of Steel, August 21, 1897, p. 15; Commercial and Financial Chronicle (hereafter cited as Comm. Chronicle), June 2, 1897, pp. 4-5; Iron Age, April 16, 1891, pp. 737-38; American Wool Reporter, March 1, 1888, p. 134. Bradstreefs, November 12, 1892, p. 721, noted a resolution of the New York Board of Trade and Transportation calling for restriction of immigration in the interest of national security.

7 Congressional Record, 54th Cong., 2d Sess., XXIX, Nos. 1, 2, 3 (1896-97), 246, 1235, 1677, 1937, 2948.

8 Comm. Chronicle, June 19, 1869, p. 774; March 25, 1871, pp. 358-59; Iron Age, January 18, 1866; March 28, 1867; , St. LouisJournal of Commerce, 10 17, 1870, p. 7Google Scholar.

9 Bankers1 Magazine, XXIX (November 1874), 341; XXIX (February 1875), 579! XXX (April 1876), 763-71; Iron Age, December 23, 1875, p. 15.

10 , St. LouisJournal of Commerce, 05 30, 1874, pp. 56Google Scholar; American Manufacturer, August 3. 1877, P- 3

11 American Iron and Steel Association, Bulletin, 08 8, 1877, p. 213Google Scholar.

12 Ibid. Italics arc Swank's.

13 Bankers' Magazine, XXIX (11 1874), 340-44; XXX (April 1876), 769-70Google Scholar; Iron Age, December 23, 1875, P- 15; September 13; 1877, p. 14; Railroad Gazette, January 16, 1875, pp. 24-25.

14 Brad'street's, March 4, 1882, p. 129.

15 Freedom of Immigration. Statements Presented at Hearings Before the Committee on Commerce of the House of Representatives at Washington, December 14, 15, 16, 1876 …,” Boston, 1876, pp. 1926Google Scholar.

16 National Board of Trade, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (1882), p. 14Google Scholar. Also, Conim. Chronicle, July 15, 1882, pp. 67-68; Railway Review, April 15, 1882, p. 212; July 22, 1882, p. 414.

17 Am. Iron and Steel Ass'n, Bulletin, September 12, 1883, p. 252; June 2, 1886, p. 140.

18 Elkins, Stephen B., The Industrial Question in the United States (New York: Press of Styles and Cash, 1885), p. 7Google Scholar; The Labor Crisis,” North American Review, CXLJI (06 1886), 608–9Google Scholar.

19 Shoe and Leather Review, May 7, 1885, p. 607. Also, Comm. Chronicle, September 13. 1890, pp. 317-18; Am. Manufacturer, March 5, 1886, p. 10.

20 Age of Steel, February 18, 1888, p. 9; Railroad Gazette, April 29, 1887, p. 291; Cotntn. Chronicle, March 28, 1887, p. 669.

21 June 9, 1894, p. 8.

22 Age of Steel, February 17, 1883, p. 178; Railroad Gazette, February 23, 1883, p. 128; March 18, 1883, p. 317; December 21, 1883, p. 884.

23 Brad'street's, January 24, 1891, p. 54; Railroad Gazette, April 29, 1887, p. 291.

24 November 27, 1885, p. 12. Also Textile World, XIV (01 1898), 36Google Scholar; Shoe and Leather Review, May 6, 1886, p. 780; October 14, 1886, p. 21; Iron Age, February 3, 1887, p. 23; Iron Trade Review, April 16, 1896, p. 6; Am. Wool Reporter, May 31, 1894, p. 681.

25 May 7, 1885, p. 607.

26 February 16, 1894, p. 93; Bradstreet's, November 18, 1884, p. 289; Railway Age, May 20, 1886, p. 270; Railway Review, July 9, 1887, p. 399; Age o) Steel, August 25, 1888, p. 7.

27 Congressional Record, 48th Cong., 2d Sess., XVI, No. 2 (1885), 1778–79Google Scholar.

28 Age of Steel, September 8, 1894, p. 7; November 20, 1897, p. 15; Iron Age, June 16, 1887, p. 19; August 9, 1888, pp. 204-5; U. S. Immigration Commission, Immigration Legislation (Vol. XXXIX of Commission Reports) (Washington, 1911), p. 36Google Scholar; 51st Cong., 2d Sess., H. R. Reports, No. 3724, p. 238; Proceedings of the American Federation of Labor, 1888, p. 29; 1889, pp. 15, 24-28.

29 The Chamber of Commerce of the State of New York, Annual Report of the Corporation, 1887-1888, p. 46Google Scholar. Also, Am. Iron and Steel Ass'n, Annual Report of the Secretary, 1887, p. 10; Chicago Board of Trade, Annual Report …, 1887, pp. xx-xxi.

30 April 6, 1895, p. 16; Iron Trade Review, March 5, 1896, p. 6.

31 Barns, William E., ed., The Labor Problem, Plain Questions and Practical Answers (New York, 1886)Google Scholar, a compilation of statements first printed in the Age of Steel. National Board of Trade, Proceedings …, 1894, pp. 51-55.

32 August 30, 1890, p. 9. Also, Railway Age, May 6, 1886, p. 243; November 15, 1889, p. 749; Am. Economist, Februar y 10, 1893, p. 52; Comm. Chronicle, May 28, 1887, p. 669: Chicago Board of Trade, Annual Report …, 1894, pp. xxi-xxiii; 1895, p. xxix; National Board of Trade, Proceedings …. 1888, pp. 21-24; Am. Iron and Steel Ass'n, Bulletin June 2, 1886, p. 140.

33 Nevins, Allan, ed., Selected Writings of Abram S. Hewitt (New York: Columbia University Press, 1937), p. 362Google Scholar. Also, Comm. Chronicle, May 28, 1887, p. 669; National Board of Trade, Proceedings …, 1894, pp. 71-73; New York. Chamber of Commerce, Annual Report …. 1883-84, p. 23.

34 May 31, 1883, p. 301. Also, Railway Review, July 24, 1886, p. 385. The Railroad Gazette, however, conceded that the reduction in available land was bound to limit opportunities for native and foreigner alike. August 6, 1886, pp. 544-45.

35 December 22, 1880, p. 4.

36 March 20, 1885, p. 10. Also, Comm. Chronicle, May 28, 1887, pp. 668-69; National Board of Trade, Proceedings …. 1888, p. 23; Am. Iron and Steel Ass'n, Bulletin, July 27, 1881, p. 187.

37 Chicago Board of Trade, Annual Report …,1885, pp. xii-xiii; Railroad Gazette, August 6, 1886, pp. 544-45; Am. Economist, March 13, 1891, pp. 162-63.

38 Am. Bankers' Ass'n, Proceedings …, 1886, pp. 83-90. See also a speech by George William Curtis, “The English-Speaking Race,” before the New York Chamber of Commerce, Annual Report …, 1887-88, pp. 48 ff.

39 April 14, 1892, p. 719; Ma y 25, 1893, pp. 1179-80.

40 July.30, 1892, pp. 162-63; August 25, 1888, pp. 213-14. Also, Am. Wool Reporter, March 1, 1888, p. 134; Age of Steel, April 24, 1886, p. 7; Bradstreet's, February 21, 1896, pp. 116-17; Am. Iron and Steel Ass'n Annual Report …, 1890, pp. 58-59; National Board of Trade, Proceedings…. 1888, pp. 2123Google Scholar.

41 Age of Steel, January 30, 1886, pp. 7-8; Carnegie, Andrew, Triumphant Democracy (New York, 1886), p. 348CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 May 8, 1886, p. 5. Also, Railway Age, May 6, 1886, p. 242; May 20, 1886, p. 270; Railway Review, July 24, 1886, p. 385; May 8, 1886, p. 226.

43 Chicago Board of Trade, Annual Report …, 1887, pp. xx–xxiGoogle Scholar; 1895, p. xxix; Age of Steel, August 29, 1892, p. 12; Shoe and Leather Reporter, July 19, 1894, p. 130; Comm. Chronicle, May 28, 1887, P. 669. September 13, 1890, pp. 317-18; September 5, 1891, pp. 309-10.

44 Nevins, Allan, op. cit., p. 328Google Scholar. For other comments on the responsibility of immigratio n for the growth of radicalism, see Age of Steel, May 14, 1885, p. 8; Am. Manufacturer, January 29, 1886, p. 10; July 16, 1886, p. 10; Iron Age, August 9, 1888, pp. 204-5; Railway Review, July 9, 1887, p. 399; Railway Age, August 12, 1887, pp. 560-61; November 15, 1889, p. 748; New York Chamber of Commerce, Annual Report …. 1887-88, p. xxvi; National Board of Trade, Proceedings …, 1894, p. 85Google Scholar; Bradstreefs, May 15, 1886, p. 306; August 11, 1894, p. 500.

45 Iron Age, February 7, 1884, p. 16.