Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T08:54:55.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

William Fremantle, Samuel Barnett and the Broad Church Origins of Toynbee Hall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Extract

Contemporaries and historians alike have regarded the 1880s as a watershed in Victorian thought. They have argued that before the 1880s the well-to-do held firmly to a belief in Political Economy and attributed economic success to the high moral character and hard work of the individual. By the 1880s these beliefs had begun to waver, and many who had themselves prospered from the new economic system began to question its assumptions and develop a sense of responsibility toward those beneath them in the social order. One institution which seems to represent this change is Toynbee Hall, the first English settlement house, founded in 1884. Headed by a middle-class clergyman, Samuel Barnett, staffed by well-educated and well-to-do volunteers and dedicated to bringing education and culture to the poor, it seems to be an example, par excellence, of the newly heightened middle-class social conscience typical of the 1880s.2 But close examination reveals that the origins of Toynbee Hall date back to the 1870s, to the broad church orientation and parish practices of Samuel Barnett. Rooted in his modest day-to-day pastoral work rather than in new concepts of social justice, Toynbee Hall raises the question of whether in fact the 1880s constitute a great divide in Victorian thought or a period of continuation, expansion and institutionalisation of earlier ideas and practices.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for instance, Webb, B., My Apprenticeship, Harmondsworth 1938, iGoogle Scholar. 204ff. Toynbee, A., ‘Progress and poverty: a criticism of Mr. Henry George being two lectures delivered in St. Andrew's Hall, Newman Street, London’ (Jan., 1883), in Lectures on the Industrial Revolution of the Eighteenth Century in England: popular addresses, notes and other fragments, ed. Jowett, B., London 1906, 318Google Scholar. Helen Lynd analyses the changes which occurred in the 1880s and attributes them to a new positive conception of freedom and social responsibility. See Lynd, H. M., England in the Eighteen-Eighties: toward a social basis for freedom, 2nd impression, London 1968Google Scholar.

2 Although Barnett did not originate the idea of ‘settling’ he was the first to integrate the practice into his ministry and continue it on a long-term basis. The first ‘settlers’ were Edward Denison and Edmund Hollond, both of whom lived in Stepney for a short time in the 1860s. See Denison, E., Letters and other Writings of the late Edward Denison, M.P. for Newark, ed. Leighton, Sir Baldwyn, London 1872, 3671Google Scholar. Green, J. R., ‘A brother of the poor’, Stray Studies, London 1904, 929Google Scholar.

3 Picht, W., Toynbee Hall and the English Settlement Movement, trans. Cowell, L., London 1914, 929Google Scholar. Pimlott, J. A. R., Toynbee Hall: fifty years of social progress, 1884–1934, London1935, 120Google Scholar. Inglis, K. S., Churches and the Working Classes in Victorian England, London 1963Google Scholar, 143ff. The quotation is on p. 156. Mcllhinney, D. B., ‘A Gentleman in every slum: Church of England missions in East London, 1837–1914’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 1977Google Scholar, 159ff, 288ff. Another study which deals with Toynbee Hall, but overlooks its broad church origins is Abel, E. K., ‘Canon Barnett and the first thirty years of Toynbee Hall’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Queen Mary College, London 1969Google Scholar. An intellectual connection between Fremantle and Barnett is briefly mentioned in Clark, G. Kitson, Churchmen and the Condition of England, 1832–1885, London 1973, 278Google Scholar.

4 For an informative discussion of the term ‘broad church’ and its early history see Sanders, C. R., Coleridge and the Broad Church Movement: studies in S. T. Coleridge, Dr Arnold of Rugby, J. C. Hare, Thomas Carlyle and F. D. Maurice, Durham, N.C. 1942,Google Scholar 7ff. For an excellent discussion of the major ideas of the broad church movement, see Knights, B., The Idea of Clerisy in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge 1978Google Scholar.

5 Shannon, R. T., ‘John Robert Seeley and the idea of a national Church: a study in churchmanship, historiography and politics’, in Ideas and Institutions of Victorian Britain: essays in honour of George Kitson Clark, ed. Robson, R., New York 1967, 236Google Scholar.

6 J. R. Green was the vicar at St Philip's, Stepney; Harry Jones was the vicar at St George's-in-the-East. See Jones, H., East and West London: being notes of a common life and pastoral work in St. James' Westminster and St. George's-in-the-East, London 1875Google Scholar; Brooke Lambert was the vicar at St Mark's, Whitechapel.

7 Fremantle, W. H., Recollections, ed. Draper, W. H., London 1921, 35Google Scholar.

8 Ibid., 29. The biographical information on Fremantle prior to his rectorship at St Mary's is from Recollections, and L. Stephen and Lee, S., eds. Dictionary of National Biography from Earliest Times to 1900, Oxford 1921-2Google Scholar, vii. 688ff and DNB Supplement, xxii. 67.

9 Arnold, T., Principles of Church Reform, new edn, London 1962Google Scholar, 120ff.

10 Fremantle, W., Lay Power in Parishes: the most needed Church reform, London 1869Google Scholar.

11 The parish was divided during the late 1860s so that its population decreased to 10,000. See Fremantle, W., St. Mary's, Bryanston Square: pastoral address and report of the charities for the year 1870, 8Google Scholar.

11 MacKenzie, G., Marylebone: a great city north of Oxford Street, New York 1972, 37Google Scholar, 67ff.

13 Fremantle, W., The World as the Subject of Redemption, London 1895, 290Google Scholar, 291.

14 Fremantle, Lay Power in Parishes, 32.

15 Ibid., 46.

16 W. Fremantle, ‘The parish as a church: pastoral address for 1879’, reprinted in The World as the Subject of Redemption, 384.

17 Ibid., 385.

18 Ibid., 385, 386.

19 Ibid., 385.

20 Fremantle, Pastoral Address, 1870.

21 Ibid., 2, 19.

22 Fremantle, Recollections, 88.

23 Hill, O., Further Account of the Walmer Street Industrial Experiment, London 1872, 6Google Scholar.

24 Regulations for the Formation of a Council for the Congregation and Church District of St. Mary's, Bryanston Square, n.p., n.d., 1.

25 Ibid., 3.

26 For a most interesting discussion of the social meaning of charity see Jones, G. S., Outcast London: a study in the relationship between classes in Victorian society, Oxford 1971Google Scholar, 251ff. For a very different view of charity from Jones, see Kitson Clark, Churchmen, 272.

27 For instance, Thomas Arnold attacked the idea that society was ‘a mere collection of individuals, looking each after his own interest’. See Arnold, Church Reform, 93ff.

28 Fremantle, Pastoral Address, 1870, 19.

29 Hill, Walmer Street, 5.

30 Hill, , ‘Appendix B: Miss Hill's report of the Walmer Street district’, Pastoral Report, 1870, 34Google Scholar.

31 Both The Gospel of the Secular Life, London 1882,Google Scholar and Christianity and Liberal Politics, London 1885Google Scholar, by Fremantle advocate an expansive role for the Church in all areas of secular life.

32 Fremantle, World as Subject of Redemption, 215.

33 The biographical information on Barnett is largely from Barnett, H., Canon Barnett: his life work andfriends, London 1921Google Scholar, since few of his writings before the 1880s are extant. On his trip to the United States, see Samuel Barnett, ‘Diary of trip to America 1867’, Greater London Council Record Office, Barnett MSS 557.

34 Barnett, Life, 23.

35 Quoted, ibid., 22.

36 Octavia Hill, letter to Mary Harris, 27 Nov. 1870, Barnett MSS 460.

37 Quoted in Barnett, Life, 23.

38 Quoted, ibid., 27.

39 Quoted, ibid., 26.

40 John Seeley quoted in Shannon, ‘Seeley’, 244.

41 Quoted in Barnett, Life, 25.

42 Smith, H. Llewellyn, ‘Influx of Population’, in Booth, C., Life and Labour of the People of London, 17 vols, London 18921902,Google Scholar iii. 100ff. B. Potter, ‘Thejewish Community’, in Booth, Life and Labour, iii. 166–1.

43 Booth, Life and Labour, i. 40–66.

44 From writing of Samuel Barnett in 1878, quoted in Barnett, Life, 96.

45 Letter from Samuel Barnett to St Jude's parishioners, 7 Mar. 1873, Barnett MSS 466.

46 Samuel Barnett quoted in Barnett, Life, 78.

47 Ibid., 101.

48 Ibid., 153.

49 Barnett, S. A., ‘A people's Church’, Practicable Socialism: essays on social reform, London 1888, 148Google Scholar.

50 Quoted in Barnett, Life, 92.

51 Barnett, ‘A people's church’, 144.

52 Barnett, Life, 332.

53 Quoted, ibid., 544–5.

54 See, for instance, Barnett, ‘A people's church’, 148.

55 Arnold Toynbee to friend, July 1875, quoted in Lectures on Industrial Revolution, xxi.

56 See, for instance, Pimlott, Toynbee Hall, 25ff Picht, Toynbee Hall, 9ff. Inglis, Churches and the Working Classes, 143ff.

57 Universities' Settlement in East London, Fifth Annual Report, 1889, 26.

58 Educational and social expenditures comprised about 75 per cent of the budget throughout the 1880s.

59 Barnett, S., ‘Introduction’, Universities' Settlement in East London, Twenty-Second Annual Report, 1906, ixGoogle Scholar.