Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 April 2019
England's first Tudor monarchs were formally devoted to the cult of St Thomas of Canterbury. In popular memory, however, Thomas was a champion of law and custom, an opponent of untrammelled royal power, and – especially among the clergy – a martyr for ecclesiastical ‘liberties’. This suggests that the pre-Reformation Church was considerably less ‘monarchical’ than is sometimes supposed. In the 1530s Thomas became a powerful symbol of resistance to Henry VIII's royal supremacy. However, the fact that he could be portrayed as a patron of the clergy's sectional interests helps to explain how opposition was weakened and divided.
3 Mayer, T. F., ‘Becket's bones burnt! Cardinal Pole and the invention and dissemination of an atrocity’, in Freeman, T. S. and Mayer, T. F. (eds), Martyrs and martyrdom in England, c. 1400–1700, Woodbridge 2007, 126–43Google Scholar.
4 Roberts, P., ‘Politics, drama and the cult of Thomas Becket in the sixteenth century’, in Morris, C. and Roberts, P. (eds), Pilgrimage: the English experience from Becket to Bunyan, Cambridge 2002, 220–1Google Scholar.
5 In addition to Mason, What became of the bones, see Butler, J., The quest for Becket's bones, New Haven–London, 1995Google Scholar.
6 C. Wriothesley, A chronicle of England, ed. W. D. Hamilton (Camden Society n.s. xi, xx, 1875–7), i. 86–7; TNA, SP 1/143, fos 204r–205r (LP xiv/1, 402). For Cromwell's involvement see MacCulloch, D., Thomas Cromwell: a life, London 2018, 487–8Google Scholar.
7 Mason, What became of the bones, 133; Roberts, ‘Cult of Thomas Becket’, 221–4.
8 Tudor royal proclamations, ed. Hughes, P. L. and Larkin, J. F., New Haven–London, 1964–9, i. 275–6Google Scholar.
9 Aston, M., Broken idols of the English Reformation, Cambridge 2016, 361–401, quotation at p. 365CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Roberts, ‘Cult of Thomas Becket’, 199–237, and Scully, R. E., ‘The unmaking of a saint: Thomas Becket and the English Reformation’, Catholic Historical Review lxxxvi (2000), 579–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For disciplinary action see LP xii/2. 231, 537; xiii/1. 1043; xiii/2. 101; xiv/1. 47, 76, 245, 444, 1053; xvi. 340.
10 ‘Num novam aliquam historiam condet? Sic sane fecit’: Epistolarum Reginaldi Poli, ed. A. M. Querini, Brescia 1744–57, i. 105.
13 Bernard, G., The late medieval English Church: vitality and vulnerability before the break with Rome, New Haven–London 2012, 17–48Google Scholar, quotation at p. 48.
14 There is no published biographical study of Warham, though an excellent point of orientation is supplied in J. J. Scarisbrick, ‘Warham, William (1450?–1532)’, ODNB. See also M. H. Lewis, ‘William Warham, patron of Erasmus’, unpubl. PhD diss. McGill 1997, and M. J. Kelly, ‘Canterbury jurisdiction and influence during the episcopate of William Warham, 1503–1532’, unpubl. PhD diss. Cambridge 1965.
15 See Ullman, W., ‘Thomas Becket's miraculous oil’, JTS viii (1957), 129–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sandquist, T. A., ‘The holy oil of St Thomas of Canterbury’, in Sandquist, T. A. and Powick, M. R. (eds), Essays in medieval history presented to Bertie Wilkinson, Toronto 1969, 330–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Wilson, C., ‘The tomb of Henry iv and the holy oil of St Thomas of Canterbury’, in Fernie, E. and Crossley, P. (eds), Medieval architecture and its intellectual context, London 1990, 182–90Google Scholar.
19 Bodleian Library, Oxford, ms Ashmole 1116, fo. 100r–v, transcribed in Russell, J. G., The Field of the Cloth of Gold, London 1969, 209–10Google Scholar; ‘The visit of the Emperor Charles v to England, A.D. 1522’, in Rutland papers: original documents illustrative of the courts and times of Henry VII and Henry VIII, ed. Jerdan, W. (Camden Society xxi, 1842), 80–1Google Scholar.
20 Bernard, G., ‘The piety of Henry viii’, in Amos, N. S., Pettegree, A. and van Nierop, H. (eds.), The education of a Christian society: humanism and reformation in Britain and the Netherlands, Aldershot 1999, 74–5Google Scholar.
21 LP ii. 290.
23 The Paston letters, ed. J. Gairdner, London 1904, vi. 129–31. ‘Unlawful’ may be a loyalist interpolation on the part of William Paston, as suggested by Fletcher and MacCulloch (Rebellions, 18), though an alternative reading is that the measures against which St Thomas protested were themselves unlawful.
26 Duggan, A., ‘Canterbury: the Becket effect’, in Ryer-Hemet, C. (ed.), Canterbury: a medieval city, Newcastle-upon-Tyne 2010, 85–8Google Scholar.
28 Speculum sacerdotale, ed. E. H. Weatherley (Early English Text Society cc, 1936), 15.
30 Webster, P., ‘Crown versus Church after Becket: King John, St Thomas and the Interdict’, in Webster, P. and Gelin, M.-P. (eds), The cult of St Thomas Becket in the Plantagenet world, c.1170–c.1220, Woodbridge 2016, 169Google Scholar; Swanson, R. N., Indulgences in late medieval England: passports to paradise?, Cambridge 2007, 52, 315–16Google Scholar; Nilson, B., ‘The medieval experience at the shrine’, in Stopford, J. (ed.), Pilgrimage explored, Woodbridge 1999, 113Google Scholar.
31 Swanson, Indulgences, 179–223.
32 TNA, SP 1/71, fo. 2r (LP v. 1371).
33 TNA, SP 1/192, fo. 208r (LP viii. 626).
34 In noting the rebel article, M. L Bush is arguably too inclined to insist on the primacy of ‘fiscal grievances’: ‘Tax reform and rebellion in early Tudor England’, History lxxvi (1991), 394–5Google Scholar. Elsewhere, in a distinguished body of work, Bush emphasises how early Tudor notions of ‘commonweal’ encompassed both economic and spiritual values: for example in The pilgrim's complaint: a study of popular thought in the early Tudor North, Farnham 2009, 1–43Google Scholar.
35 TNA, SP 1/192, fo. 208r (LP viii. 626).
37 The early English carols, ed. Greene, R. L., Oxford 1935, 71–4Google Scholar. I have not been able to trace the derivation of this idea; it may represent a variant listing of the Constitutions of Clarendon, though it is difficult to see how these could be subdivided so as to arrive near this number.
38 RSTC, 24873–4; cf de Voragine, Jacobus, The golden legend: readings on the saints, ed. Ryan, W. G., Princeton 1993, i. 59–62Google Scholar.
39 RSTC, 24876–80.
40 Here begynneth the lyfe of the blessed martyr Saynte Thomas, ?London 1520.
42 RSTC, 17958–75.
45 The Tudor constitution, ed. G. R. Elton, Cambridge 1960, 62–3.
46 J. B. Trapp, ‘Urswick, Christopher (1448?–1522)’, ODNB.
47 Records of the family of Urswyk, ed. W. Urswick, St Albans 1893, 120–2; Trapp, J. B., ‘Christopher Urswick and his books: the reading of Henry vii’s almoner’, Renaissance Studies i (1987), 48–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kaufman, P. I., The ‘Polytyque Churche’: religion and early Tudor political culture, 1485–1516, Macon, Ga 1986, 27–9Google Scholar.
54 Theilman, J. M., ‘The miracles of King Henry vi of England’, The Historian xlii (1980), 456–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Duffy, E., The stripping of the altars: traditional religion in England, c. 1400–c. 1580, 2nd edn, New Haven–London 2005, 195Google Scholar; Knox, R. and Leslie, S. (eds), The miracles of King Henry VI, Cambridge 1923, 164–7Google Scholar.
55 The Great Chronicle of London, ed. Thomas, A. H. and Thornley, I. D., London 1938, 335Google Scholar.
56 Scarisbrick, ‘Warham’; Marshall, Heretics and believers, 42.
57 Lewis, ‘William Warham’, 184–5; LP iii. 2647; iv. 470; i. 731 (40); Woodruff, C. Eveleigh and Danks, W., Memorials of the cathedral and priory of Christ in Canterbury, New York 1912, 214–15Google Scholar.
58 Literae Cantuarienses: the letter books of the monastery of Christ Church, Canterbury, ed. Brigstocke, J.Sheppard, London 1889, iii. 416–40Google Scholar, quotations at pp. 425, 432, 437; LP i. 1780, 1941, 2163.
59 P. R. Cavill, ‘A perspective on the Church-State confrontation of 1515: the passage of 4 Henry VIII, c. 2’, this Journal lxiii (2012), 655–70.
60 Olin, J. C. (ed.), The Catholic Reformation: Savonarola to Ignatius Loyola, 2nd edn, New York 1992, 56–64Google Scholar, quotation at p. 64. The best discussion of the Hunne case is Bernard, Late medieval Church, ch. i.
61 Gwyn, P., The king's cardinal: the rise and fall of Thomas Wolsey, London 1990, 45–6Google Scholar.
62 Marshall, Heretics and believers, 93–4; Keilway, R., Reports d'ascuns cases qui ont evenus aux temps du Roy Henry le septiême, London 1688, 185Google Scholar (my translation).
63 Gwyn, Wolsey, 49–50.
64 Marshall, Heretics and believers, 94–5; LP iii. 1218; TNA, SP 1/40, fo. 1r (LP iv. 2622).
65 Davis, J. F., ‘Lollards, reformers and St Thomas of Canterbury’, University of Birmingham Historical Journal ix (1963), 1–15Google Scholar.
66 TNA, SP 1/12, fos 17v–18r (LP ii. 1314).
67 Tyndale, W., Expositions and notes … together with the practice of prelates, ed. Walter, H., Cambridge 1849, 273–4, 292–3Google Scholar; An answer to Sir Thomas More's dialogue, ed. H. Walter, Cambridge 1850, 12.
68 Three chapters of letters relating to the suppression of monasteries, ed. T. Wright (Camden Society o.s. xxvi, 1843), 6; Foxe, J., Actes and monuments, London 1583Google Scholar, bk viii, 1053.
70 The correspondence of Sir Thomas More, ed. E. F. Rogers, Princeton 1947, 564; More, T., The confutation of Tyndale's Answer, ed. Schuster, L. A. and others, New Haven–London 1973, i. 13, 17Google Scholar.
71 More, T., A dialogue concerning heresies, ed. Lawler, T. M. C. and others, New Haven–London 1981, 52Google Scholar.
72 St German, C., The addicions of Salem and Byzance, London 1534, fos 53v–61vGoogle Scholar, quotations at fos 53v, 54r, 55v.
73 Marshall, Heretics and believers, 183–5, 194–5.
74 Moyes, J., ‘Warham, an English primate on the eve of the Reformation’, Dublin Review cxiv (1894), 390–420Google Scholar (at pp. 401–14 transcribing TNA, SP 1/70, fos 209r–215v; LP v. 1247), quotations at pp. 407, 409, 410, 412.
75 Scarisbrick, ‘Warham’; Bernard, G., The king's Reformation: Henry VIII and the remaking of the English Church, New Haven–London 2005, 177–8Google Scholar.
76 Roberts, ‘Cult of Becket’, 204–5.
77 LP vi. 1466; Wright, Three chapters of letters, 16–17.
78 LP vii. 232; vi. 235.
79 LP viii. 1117.