Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T22:44:31.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post mortes on the Wars in Indo-China—A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Get access

Abstract

A major shortcoming in much Western writing about recent events in Indo-China is that the inhabitants of the region are seen as objects of policy rather than as subjects of history. Focusing in this, way leaves out much of the picture and demeans the inhabitants of Indo-China who are largely responsible, after all, for defeating France and the United States. A number of the books reviewed here take a sympathetic insider's view of U.S. intervention in the region and try to approach the war objectively but still have an American focus. One book is a systematic attack on U.S. behavior in Cambodia since 1970. Finally a recently published collection of documents will be indispensable to students of the war, partly because it pays close attention to Vietnamese as well as American decisions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Big Story: How the American Press and Television Reported and Interpreted the Crisis of Tet 1968 in Vietnam and Washington, By Braestrup, Peter. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, abridged edition, 1978. xviii, 606 pp. Index. $8.95 (paper).Google Scholar

Many Reasons Why: The American Involvement in Vietnam. By Charlton, Michael and Moncrieff, Anthony. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979. xiv, 250 pp. Index. No price. (United States edition published by Hill and Wang.)Google Scholar

Ideals and Reality: An Analysis of the Debate over Vietnam. By Stephen A. Garrett. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, 1978. x, 244 pp. Bibliography, Index. $9.50 (paper).

The Irony of Vietnam: The System Worked. By Gelb, Leslie H. with Betts, Richard K.. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1979. viii, 387 pp. Bibliography, Index. $14.95 (cloth); $5.95 (paper).Google Scholar

The Lost Peace: America's Search for a Negotiated Settlement of the Vietnam War. By Goodman, Allan E.. Stanford: The Hoover Institution Press (Hoover Institution Publication No. 173), 1978. xviii, 298 pp. Plates, Appendixes, Notes, Index. $22.50 (cloth).Google Scholar

America's Longest War: The United States and Vietnam 1958-1975. By Herring, George C.. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1979. xii, 298 pp. Map, Suggestions for Additional Reading, Index. $6.95 (paper).Google Scholar

America in Vietnam. By Lewy, Guenther. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978. xiii, 540 pp. Tables, Maps, Charts, Appendixes, Notes, Glossary, Index. $19.95 (cloth).Google Scholar

Vietnam: The Definitive Documentation of Human Decisions. Edited with Commentary and Introduction by Porter, Gareth. 2 volumes: xxx, 724 pp., Index; xxii, 675 pp., Index. Stanfordville, N.Y.: Earl M. Coleman Enterprises, Inc. 1979. $60.00 (cloth).Google Scholar

Sideshow: Kissinger, Nixon, and the Destruction of Cambodia. By Shawcross, William. New York: Simon and Shuster, 1979. 467 pp. Maps, Plates, Chronology, Bibliography, Index. $13.95 (cloth).Google Scholar

1 Gelb, Leslie, “Vietnam: The System Worked,”, Foreign Policy 3 (Summer 1971): 140–67Google Scholar, and “The Essential Domino: American Politics and Vietnam,”, Foreign Affairs 50, 3 (April, 1972): 459–75.Google Scholar

2 For a brief account of post-1968 policies, see pp. 348–52.

3 Thomson, James C., “How Could Vietnam Happen?” Atlantic Monthly. May 1968.Google Scholar

4 Gallucci, Robert L.Neither Peace nor Honor: The Politics of American Military Policy in Vietnam (Johns Hopkins Studies, in International Affairs 24), Baltimore: 1975. For a discussion of FSO Paul Kattenberg's opposition to increased U.S. in'volvement, see Gelb and Betts, pp. 234–35.Google Scholar

5 See Raskin, M., “From Pearl Harbor to Vietnam: Shifting Generational Paradigms of Foreign Policy,” Political Science Quarterly 89 (1974): 563–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Herr, Michael, Dispatches (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1979), p. 71.Google Scholar

7 The mot was McGeorge Bundy's; see Gelb and Betts, p. 116.Google Scholar

8 To avoid killing civilians, commanders of helicopter units were urged to have “a soul searching session with their aviators and gunners,” partly because “we cannot afford to be criticized as indiscriminate killers” (Lewy, p. 236). Emphasis added.Google Scholar

9 See especially pp. 329–31 on the Pears enquiry.

10 Cf. Charlton, and Moncrieff, , pp. 5458; and Duncanson, Dennis, Government and Revolution in Vietnam (London: Oxford University Press, 1968) pp. 219–26.Google Scholar

11 See Kahin, George McT., “The Pentagon Papers: A Critical Evaluation,” American Political Science Review 69 (June 1975): 675–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and also his Political Polarization in South Vietnam: U.S. Policy in the post-Diem Period” Pacific Affairs 52/4; Winter 1979–80): 647–73. In these articles, Kahin irgues persuasively that U.S. political interference in post-Diem Vietnam was often used as a way to intensify and “rationalize” increasing military involvement.

12 See Porter, Gareth, A Peace Denied: The United States, Vietnam and the Paris Agreement (Bloom-ington: University of Indiana Press, 1975).Google Scholar

13 In fact, intensified bombings of 1972 had little effect on stopping the flow of supplies from north to south. See Kahin, George, “A Visit to a Heavily Bombed Area.” The Sunday Star and Daily lews (Washington, D.C.), Oct. 22, 1972.Google Scholar

14 Woodside, Alexander, “Premeditated Amneia: American Attitudes toward History,” The Nation, Dec. 13, 1975, pp. 614–18.Google Scholar

15 Kissinger, Henry, White House Years (Boston: Little Brown, 1979), pp. 486, 517.Google Scholar

16 Nixon, Richard M., RN (New York: Grosser and Dunlop, 1978) p. 449.Google Scholar

17 See the New York Times, Oct. 31, 1979.Google Scholar

18 Thomson, , “How Could Vietnam Happen?” Dodd, Mead, 1970).Google Scholar

19 Cooper, Chester, A Lost Crusade (New York:Google Scholar