No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Indonesia and the Origins of Dutch Colonial Sovereignty
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2011
Extract
The Major steps taken in the settlement of the Indonesian dispute on November 1, 1949, at the Hague and the subsequent transformation of the East Indian Archipelago into a modern national state have thrown into even sharper focus the recent significant changes in the political constitution of the once great colonial powers. The solution of the Indonesian problem has in no small measure been based on a recognition of the mutual economic and cultural interdependence of the two disputants. With this recognition the political factors of the problem have lost much of their controversial nature. The future of the Netherlands Commonwealth, on the basis of a harmonious co-operation in the realms of trade, agriculture, industry, and cultural exchange between the various partners, seems assured. Although the period of armed conflict between Indonesians and Dutch would justify the assumption that the Dutch wished to continue exclusive political control over the Indies it now seems that Dutch recognition of Indonesian national sovereignty might eliminate any lingering suspicion in the minds of Indonesian nationalists. The question of political liberty, once regarded, even by the United Nations mediators, as the nub of a possible settlement of the conflict has lost much if not all of its meaning. Colonial sovereignty, and all that it entails, has now come to an end.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1951
References
1 For the round-table conference at the Hague in 1949 and its resolutions see my article “The Indonesian settlement,” Current history, 18 (April, 1950), 193–96.Google Scholar
2 Hatta, Mohammad, Beberapa jasal ekonomi (Batavia, 1945), 33–39Google Scholar and Fruin, Th. A., Het economisch aspect van het Indonesische vraagstuk (Amsterdam, 1947), 90–95.Google Scholar
3 See in this connection Mansoer, Tengkoe, “Oost-Sumatra in een nieuwe gestalte,” Indo-nesie, 2 (1948), 98,101Google Scholar. Sutan Sjahrir, thrice prime minister of the Indonesian Republic has given a good picture of the origin and effect of this mistrust of Dutch policy in Sjahrazad in Indonesische overpeinzingen (Amsterdam, 1945).
4 See the report of the Committee on Good Offices on The Indonesian Question, Document S/787 in Security Council, Official records, supplement for June, 1948 (New York: Lake Success, 1948), 41 ff.Google Scholar, and “Indonesia, political and economic realities,” The world today, 5 (1949), 52–54.Google Scholar
5 Baasch, E., Holländische wirthschaftsgeschichte (Jena, 1927), 368.Google Scholar
6 De Jonge, J. (ed.), De opkomst van het Nederlandsch gezag over Java (The Hague, 1869–1878), 3:92,95.Google Scholar
7 Les, L., Van Indie onder de compagnie tot Indie onder de staat, de koloniale titel in de staatsregeling van 1798 (Utrecht, 1948), 94.Google Scholar
8 van der Kroef, Justus M., “The decline and fall of the Dutch East India Company,” The historian, 10(1948), 118–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Lokke, Carl L., France and the colonial question, a study of contemporary French opinion, 1763-1801 (New York, 1932), 35–45.Google Scholar
10 Platteel, P. J., De grondslagen der constitutie van Nederlandsch-Indie, de wording van het regeerings reglement van 1815 (Utrecht, 1936), 7–11.Google Scholar
11 Huizinga, J., Du róle d'intermédiaires joué par les Pays-Bas entre l'Europe occidentale et l'Europe centrale, Publications de la Conciliation international, Bulletin no. 7 (Genève, 1933), 3.Google Scholar
12 Platteel, 10.
13 On Raynal consult Feugère, A., Un précurseur de la revolution l'Abbé Raynal (Angouleme, 1922), passim;Google ScholarMornet, D., Les origines intellectuelles de la revolution francaise (2nd ed., Paris, 1934), 235Google Scholar, and Lokke, 45-49.
14 Geneva, 1780–81, 1:245; 3: livres 13 and 14, passim.
15 Ibid., 1:204ff. 1.
16 Feugère, 141.
17 Candide in Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire, (Paris, 1877-1885, 21:196.
18 Discours sur l'origine de l'inègalitè parmi les hommes in Oeuvres complètes de Rousseau, J. J., ed. Musset-Pathay (Paris, 1823–1826), l:267ff., and Platteel, 17.Google Scholar
19 Raynal, 1:245.
20 Ibid., 8: livre 13, passim; Montesquieu, Del'esprit des loix (Geneva, 1748), livre 21, chap. 17, and Lokke, 38.
21 Feugère, 6.
22 See van Hogendorp's letter to his brother Gijsbert Karel, June 7, 1788, in MSS Rijksarchief, the Hague. “Van Hogendorp collection,” no. 82, 10; for Wiselius c.s. see “Plan van constitute voor het volk van Nederland ontworpen door een daartoe aangestelde commissie 1796 met bijlagen” (MSS Rijksarchief, the Hague, no. 481), chap. 10; Dagverhaal der nationale vergadering (Amsterdam, 1796), 3:636 ff., and Les, chap. 5.
23 Montesquieu, livre 15, chap. 1, and Jameson, R. P., Montesquieu et l'esclavagc: étude sur les origines de l'opinion antiesclavagiste en France au XVIII siècle (Paris, 1911), 23–45.Google Scholar
24 MSS Rijksarchief, the Hague, “Secrete notulen (Resoluties) committé tot den Oost-Indischen handel en bezittingen 1796/1798,” and Les, 46.
25 Lavisse, E. and Rambaud, A., Histoire générale (Paris, 1901), 8:878ff.Google Scholar, and Marcelin, P., Haiti, ses guerres civiles, leurs causes (Paris, 1893), 36 ff.Google Scholar
26 “Secrete notulen 1796/1798,” art. 7; Les, 45, and for a commentary see van Berckel, G. J., Bijdrage tot de geschiedenis van het Nederlandsche opperbestuur, over Nederlandsch-Indie (Leiden, 1880), 177Google Scholar.
27 de Mably, M. l'abbé, Le droit public de l'Europe, fondés sur les traites (3rd ed., Geneva, 1764), 2:393–94.Google Scholar
28 Platted, 21.
29 The French translation by Demeunier, which was published at the Hague in 1775 by Gosse and Sons has been used because in this edition. Bolts' work became most widely known.
30 Bolts, 1:45–67; 2:173 ff.
31 On this problem see generally Roberts, P. E in The Cambridge history of the British empire (Cambridge, 1929), 4:181–87.Google Scholar Declared Edmund Burke: “The East India Company did not seem to be merely a Company formed for the extension of the British commerce, but in reality of the whole power and sovereignty of this kingdom sent into the East” (in Bond, E. A [ed.], Speeches of the managers and counsel in the trial of Warren Hastings [London, 1859–1861], 1:15).Google Scholar
32 Bolts, 2:181.
33 Cobbett, W., Parliamentary history of England from the Norman conquest to 1800 (London, 1857), 16:402 ft.;Google Scholar Sir Malcolm, John, The political history of India (London, 1912), 1:8 ft.;Google Scholar and Keith, A. B, A constitutional history of India 1600–1935 (London, 1936), 100–10.Google Scholar
34 Sir Dunbar, George, A history of India from the earliest times to the present day (London, 1936), chap. 7, especially 199, and chap. 12.Google Scholar
35 Vansittart, Henry, Narratives of the transactions in Bengal from 1760 to 1764, (London, 1777), 1:34–89; 2:67 If.;Google Scholar Sir Lyall, Alfred, Rise and expansion of the British dominion in India (London, 1910), 57 ft.;Google Scholar and Dodwell, H. H, in The Cambridge history of the British Empire, 4:166–76.Google Scholar
36 Roberts, , in The Cambridge history; 4:182.Google Scholar
37 Forrest, G. W (ed.), Selections from the state papers of the governors-general of India. Warren Hastings (Oxford, 1910), 2:92Google Scholar.
38 Works of Edmund Burke (London, 1906–20). 3:193–94.Google Scholar
39 Dunbar, 364.
40 Gleig, G. R (ed.). Memoirs of Warren Hastings (London, 1841), 3:481 ffGoogle Scholar.
41 Roberts, 4:186.
42 Paget-Toynbee, (ed.), Letters of Horace Walpole (London, 1876), 8:149Google Scholar.
43 Roberts, 4:188.
44 Cobbett, , Parliamentary history, 17:890–91.Google Scholar
45 Ibid., 23:715–17, and Mill, James, History of British India, with notes and continuation by Wilson, H. H, (London, 1858 ff), 4:482–85.Google Scholar
46 Malcolm, 1:37 ff., and Cobbett, , Parliamentary history, 23: 1201, 1212, 1276, 1277, 1313, 1334–35, and 1376.Google Scholar
47 Roberts, 4:199–200.
48 See a summary of Pitt's India Bill in Muir, Ramsay, The making of British India (Manchester, 1923), 170 ft., and Mill, 4:395 ff.Google Scholar
49 Kaye, J. W, The administration of the East India company (London, 1853), 1, 89, 333 and 338.Google Scholar
50 For the early life of van Hogendorp consult Sillem, J. A, Dirk van Hogendorp (Amsterdam, 1890), 12–43,Google Scholar and van Hogendorp, D, Mémoires du général Dirk van Hogendorp, publiis par son petit fils (The Hague, 1887), 32 ff.Google Scholar The history of the Dutch East India Company's settlements in India is dealt with in van der Kemp, P. H, “De Nederlandsche factorijen in Voor-Indie in den aanvang der 19e eeuw,” Bijdragen tot de taal land en volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indie, 53(1901), 258 ff.,Google Scholar and Klerk de Reus, G. C, “De vermeestering van Chin-soera in 1781 en 1795,” Verhandelingen van het Bataviasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen, 38(1897),Google Scholarpassim. A good general summary is Terpstra, H, De opkomst der westerkwartieren van de Oost-Indische compagnie (Amsterdam, 1918), 1–4, 56, 63 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51 Platteel, 30, 34. Wrote van Hogendorp later: “I curse Lord Cornwallis, who, because of his egotism and typical English pride, has curtailed the trade in opium, and thus has caused my financial ruin and has robbed me of the opportunity to return to Europe as soon as pos'sible” (In a letter to his brother Gijsbert Karel van Hogendorp, June 7, 1788, MSS Rijksar chief, the Hague. “Van Hogendorp collection,” no. 82).
52 MSS Rijksarchief, Ibid., no. 82. Letter to his brother G. K. van Hogendorp, October 18, 1786.
53 Kaye, 1, and Platteel, 27, 36.
54 Penson, Lilian M, in The Cambridge history of the British Empire, 4:442.Google Scholar
55 Quoted in Kaye, 177.
56 Ibid., 209.
57 57 Raynal, 1:390. “Osez faire jouir vos nouveaux sujets des douceurs de la propriété. Partagez-leurs les campagnes qui les ont vu naitre; ils apprendont ā les cultiver pour eux. Enchainés par ce bienfait, plus encore qu'ils ne l'étoitent par la crainte, ils paieront avec joie des tributs qui seront imposéd avec modération.”
58 Hogendorp, Dirk van, Berigt van den tegenwoordigen toestand der bataofse bezittingen in Oost-Indie en den handel op dezelve (2nd ed., Delft, 1800), 143Google Scholar.
59 As late as 1795 an official committee of inquiry commissioned by the National Assembly of the Batavian Republic could with reference to the Dutch Company declare that “neither the interests of the State, nor that of private citizens would be served if this maltreated and now so onerous organization were to be dissolved” (Decreten der provisioned repraesentanten van Holland, 2:281 in Les, 8).
60 In this connection see Supan, A., Die territoriale entwicklung der Europaische holonien (Gotha, 1906), 143–46Google Scholar.
61 Platteel, , 40Google Scholar.
62 Jonge, J. de, Opkomst, 12:359-89;Google ScholarMeinsma, J. J., Geschiedenis van de Nederlandsche Oost Indische bezittingen, (Delft, 1872), 1:246 ff., and Les, 21–22Google Scholar.
63 The six chambers of the Dutch East India Company, three of which were in the province of Holland, were located in the chief ports of the Netherlands and each, upon the founding of the company in 1602, had subscribed a definite capital, receiving dividends accordingly. Their combined capital amounted to virtually the entire capital of the company. The chambers acted at first as autonomous bodies, merely allied for purposes of trade. Through the years the company's executive, “De Heeren Zeventien” (The Seventeen Gentlemen), established its control so firmly however, that the chambers virtually lost their independence, although nominally the Seventeen remained responsible to them. Separate accounts for each chamber were kept, and each had the right to borrow money or make loans regardless of the Seventeen's approval (van, J. A. der Chijs, Geschiedenis der stichting der vereenigde compagnie [Leyden, 1857], 23 ff)Google Scholar.
64 Van Berckel, 5.
65 Dagblad van het verhandelde door de provisioned repraesentanten van Holland (S-A.E.L.), June 15, 1795, 9Google Scholar.
66 Ibid., September 15, 1795, 1-11.
67 Resolutien der Staten-Generaal (Amsterdam, 1796), 1795, 2690Google Scholar and Decreten der nationale vergadering, 1796–1798 (Amsterdam, 1799), 3:282 ftGoogle Scholar.
68 Such was the opinion, for example, of the noted contemporary colonial reformer Wiselius (Wiselius, S. I., Wederlegging van het nader request van Cras [Amsterdam, 1803], 162 ff.)Google Scholar. In the official proclamation of the decree of December 24, 1795, to the nation, we read the words “The as of now destroyed Netherlands East India Company,” etc. (Resolutien der Staten-Generaal, 1793/2, 1696). For a discussion of the problem consult van Berckel, chaps. 1-11; Platteel, 42; Les, 22, and Oranje, D. J. P., Het beleid der commissie generaal. De uitwerking der beginselen van 1815 in het regeeringsreglement van 1818 (Utrecht, 1936), 7–14Google Scholar.
69 Platteel, , 42, and Les, 16Google Scholar.
70 Colenbrander, H. T., Gedenkstukhen der algemeene geschiedenis van Nederland (vestiging van den eenheidsstaat 1795-1798) (The Hague, 1905), 2:21, and Les, 25Google Scholar.
71 Van Berckel, 73.
72 Platted, 42.
73 De Jonge, 12:425.
74 Ibid.
75 Van der Kroef, 134; see footnote 8 above.
76 MSS Rijksarchief, the Hague, “Secrete notulen (resoluties) committee tot den Oost Indischen handel en bezittingen 1796/1798, December 18 and 21, 1797.
77 Les, 100.
78 Steinmetz, J. K., Aantekeningen over de geschiedcnis van de Nederlandsche staatsschuld (Amsterdam, 1947), 68Google Scholar.
79 Colenbrander, 2:820.
80 Ibid., 821.
81 Vlekke, Bernard H., Nusantara, a history of the East Indian archipelago (Cambridge, 1945), 217;Google Scholar see also Haan, F. De, “Jacobijnen te Batavia,” Tijdschrijt van het Bataviasch Genootschap, 41 (1899), 103 ff.;Google ScholarHageman, J., “Geschiedenis van het Bataafsche en Hollandsche gouvernement op Java,” Tijdschrift van het Bataviasch Genootschap, 4 (1855), 333 ft. and 5 (1856), 164 ff.Google Scholar, and Collet, O., L'ile de Java sous la domination françaisc (Bruxelles, 1910), 18–43Google Scholar.
82 Hageman, 335.
83 Sillem, 43 ff. In considering the relations between Nederburgh and van Hogendorp, it should be noted that the former's father, who belonged to the anti-Orangist faction, had been removed from a lucrative position to make place for van Hogendorp's brother (Vlekke, 222, note 18).
84 De Jonge, 13:294.
85 D. van Hogendorp, “Korte en vrije aanmerkingen over den teegenwoordige staat in de Oost-Indische maatschappij en de belangens van de staat in de Oost-Indische bezittingen en handel,” unpublished, a resumé in Sillem, Dirk van Hogendorp, 50 ff.
86 Verbeme, L. G., Gijsbert Karel's leerjaren (Amsterdam, 1931), 21 ff.Google Scholar, and MSS Rijksarchief, the Hague. “Van Hogendorp collection,” nos. 12-18.
87 MSS Rijksarchief, ibid., no. 82.
88 Hogendorp, G. K. van, Verhandelingen over den Oost-Indischen Handel (Amsterdam, 1801/1802), 3:15–65.Google Scholar
89 Hogendorp, D. van, Berigt, 9.Google Scholar
90 Van Berckel, 134-45.
91 Schiff, D. W., De koloniale politick onder R. J. Schimmelpenninck (Amsterdam, 1864), 25.Google Scholar
92 Hageman, op. cit., 5(1856), 166, and Platteel, 58-59.
93 The Charter of 1803 was largely a victory for the Nederburgh faction, little or no free cultivation being allowed and trade monopoly being endorsed (Oranje, 20-21).
94 Daendels, H. W., Stoat der Nederlandsche Oostindische bezittingen onder het bestuur van den Gouveneur-Generaal Herman Willem Daendels, in de jaren 1808-1811 (The Hague, 1814), 12–45Google Scholar, and Deventer, S. van, Bijdragen tot de kermis van het landelijk slelsel op Java (Zalt-Bommel, 1865–1866), 1:19 ft.Google Scholar
95 Welderen Rengers, D. W. van, The failure of a liberal colonial policy, Netherlands East Indies 1816-1830 (The Hague, 1947), 17–18.Google Scholar
96 Deventer, M. L. van, “Daendels en Raffles,” De Indische gids 13, (1891), 341–63Google Scholar, 524-69, 792-818 is a brief but useful summary.
97 Jan, and Romein, Annie, Erflatcrs van onze beschaving (Amsterdam, 1939), 3:23 ff.Google Scholar
98 Platted, 110.
99 Oranje, 298.
100 See generally Stolk, A. H. H., Organisatie der rijhseenheid (Utrecht, 1939).Google Scholar
101 Handelingen van den Volksraad (Batavia, 1919 ff.)Google Scholar, 1936-37. ond. 26; 1937-38, p. 10; 1938-39, ond. 93-st. 1; 1939-40, ond. 96-st. 13.
102 Eigeman, J. A., De afbouw van het nieuwe honinkrijk (Amsterdam, 1946), chaps. 1–111.Google Scholar
103 Furnivall, J. S., Netherlands India: a study of plural economy (Cambridge, Mass., 1945), 225 ff.Google Scholar is a useful summary.
104 Burger, D. H., “Structuurveranderingen in de Javaanse samenleving,” Indonesia, 2 (1949), 381 ff.Google Scholar
105 de Kat Angelino, A. D. A., Staathundig beleid en bestuurszorg in Nederlandsch-Indie (The Hague, 1931), 2:461–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar