Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:43:20.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economie Action and Buddhist Morality in a Thai Village

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Get access

Abstract

Although the Thai-Lao peasants living in rain-fed agricultural communities in northeastern Thailand have experienced some improvements in their socioeconomic situation as a consequence of the growth of the Thai economy since the mid-1950s, these peasants still constitute the poorest sector of the population of Thailand. Moreover, the socioeconomic position of the rural northeastern Thai populace has actually declined relative to that of the urban populace and that of the rural populace living in central Thailand. The economic disadvantageous position of Thai-Lao peasants is linked with a sense of being an ethnoregional minority within a polity that has been highly centralized since reforms instituted at the end of the nineteenth century. Much of the social action of Thai-Lao peasants with reference to the political-economic constraints on their world can be understood, as long-term research in one community reveals, as having been impelled by rational calculation aimed at improving the well being of peasant families. The ways in which peasants have assessed in practice the justice of these constraints as well as the ways in which they have assessed the limits to entrepreneurship must be seen, however, as being rooted in moral premises that Thai-Lao villagers have appropriated from Theravada Buddhism as known to them in their popular culture.

Type
Articles: Peasant Strategies in Asian Societies: Moral and Rational Economic Approaches—A Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Becker, A. L. 1979. “Text-Building, Epistemology, and Aesthetics in Javanese Shadow Theatre.” In The Imagination of Reality, ed. by Becker, A. L. and Yengoyan, Aram A., pp. 211–43. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Behrman, Jere R. 1968. Supply Response in Underdeveloped Agriculture: A Case Study of Four Major Annual Crops in Thailand, 1937–1963. Amsterdam: North-Holland (Contributions to Economic Analysis, no. 55).Google Scholar
Blofeld, John. 1960. People of the Sun. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Bowie, Katherine A. 1982. “Of Witches, Thieves, and Village Leaders: The Decline of Consensual Authoritarianism and the Rise of a Crisis of Authority in Northern Thailand.” Paper presented at the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Association for Asian Studies, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dakin, Ralph E., with the cooperation of Chulalongkorn University, Department of Local Administration, and the National Research Council of Thailand. 1968. Security and Development in Northeast Thailand: Official-Villager Contacts and Villager Loyalties. Bangkok: United States Operations Mission to Thailand, Research Division.Google Scholar
Halperin, Rhoda. 1977. “Introduction: The Substantive Economy in Peasant Societies.” In Peasant Livelihood: Studies in Economic Anthropology and Cultural Ecology, ed. by Halperin, Rhoda and Dow, James, pp. 116. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, Lucien M. 1962. “Merit and Power in the Thai Social Order.” American Anthropologist 64: 1247–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). 1978. Thailand: Toward a Development Strategy of Full Participation: A Basic Economic Report. Washington, D. C: IBRD.Google Scholar
Ishii, Yoneo. 1975. “A Note on Buddhistic Millenarian Revolts in Northeastern Siam.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 6: 121–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, David B. 1980. “Bandit, Nakleng, and Peasant in Rural Thai Society.” Contributions to Asian Studies 15: 90101.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1966. “Peasant and Nation: A Thai-Lao Village in a Thai State.” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1967. Isan: Regionalism in Northeastern Thailand. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program (Data Paper, no. 65).Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1973. “The Power of Merit.” In Visakha Puja B.E. 2516, pp. 85102. Bangkok: The Buddhist Association of Thailand. Annual publication.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1975. “Kin Groups in a Thai-Lao Village.” In Change and Persistence in Thai Society, ed. by Skinner, G. William and Kirsch, A. Thomas, pp. 275–97. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1976. “In Search of Land: Village Formation in the Central Chi River Valley, Northeast Thailand.” Contributions to Asian Studies 9: 4563.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1977. “Millennialism, Theravāda Buddhism, and Thai Society.” Journal of Asian Studies 36, no. 2: 283302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1979. “Buddhist Economics in Action.” In Visakha Puja B.E. 2522, pp. 1925. Bangkok: The Buddhist Association of Thailand. Annual publication.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1982. Socioeconomic Change in Rainfed Agricultural Villages in Northeastern Thailand. Seattle: University of Washington, Department of Anthropology, Thai land Project.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1983a. “The Study of Popular Ideas of Karma.” In Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry, ed. by Keyes, Charles F. and Daniel, E. Valentine, pp. 124. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1983b. “Merit-transference in the Karmic Theory of Popular Theravāda Buddhism.” In Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry, ed. by Keyes, Charles F. and Daniel, E. Valentine, pp. 261–86. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1983c. “The Observer Observed: Changing Identities of Ethnographers in a Northeastern Thai Village.” In Fieldwork: The Human Experience, ed. by Lawless, Robert, Sutlive, Vinson H. Jr., and Zamora, Mario D., pp. 169–94. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1983d. “The Proposed World of the School: Thai Villagers Entry into a Bureaucratic State System.” Paper prepared for conference on Cultural Change and Rural Education in Southeast Asia, sponsored by the Joint Committee on Southeast Asia of the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned Societies, Penang, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Klausner, William J. 1956. “Progress Reports (to the Foreign Area Fellowship Program of the Ford Foundation).” Parts I, II, and III.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Jonathan. 1981. Peasant Values and Rural Development: An Unresolved Controversy. New York: The Population Council, Center for Policy Studies (Working Papers, no. 73).Google Scholar
MorellDavid, and Chai-Anan Samudavanija David, and Chai-Anan Samudavanija. 1981. Political Conflict in Thailand: Reform, Reaction, Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John B. 1974. “The 1901–1902 ‘Holy Man's’ Rebellion.” Journal of the Siam Society 62: 4766.Google Scholar
Nash, Manning. 1965. The G olden Road to Modernity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pasuk, Phongphaichit. 1980. Rural Women of Thailand: From Peasant Girls to Bangkok Masseuses. Geneva: International Labor Office (World Employment Programme Research, Working Papers).Google Scholar
Phillips, H. R., and Wilson, D. A.. 1964. Certain Effects of Culture and Social Organization on Internal Security in Thailand. Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corp. (Memorandum RM-3786-ARPA).Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1971. “The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as aText.” Social Research 38, no. 3: 529–62.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1982. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Ed. and trans, by Thompson, John B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riggs, Fred W. 1966. Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Herbert J. 1973a. “Will and Awe: Illustrations of Thai Villager Dependency upon Officials.” Journal of Asian Studies 32, no. 3: 425–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Herbert J. 1973b. “A Framework for the Analysis of Villager-Official Contact in Rural Thailand.” Southeast Asia 2: 233–64.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Spiro, Melford E. 1966. “Buddhism and Economic Action in Burma.” American Anthropologist 68, no. 5: 1163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley J. 1970. Buddhism and the Spirit Cults in North-East Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tej, Bunnag. 1967. “Khabot phū mī bun phāk īsān R. S. 121” [Revolt of the men-having-merit, northeastern Thailand, 1902]. Sangkhomsāt Parithat [Social Science Review] 5: 7896.Google Scholar
Thailand, National Economic and Social Development Board. 1979. Khrūangchīphāiva sangkhom khōng prathēt Thai, Ph.S. 2520 [Thailand: Social indicators, 1977]. Bangkok.Google Scholar
Thailand, National Economic and Social Development Board. 1981. Khrūangchīphāwa sangkhom 2522 [Social indicators, 1979]. Bangkok.Google Scholar
Thak, Chaloemtiarana. 1979. Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism. Bangkok: Social Science Association Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Trans., ed., with an introduction by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. trans, by Parsons, Talcott. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. ed. by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Young, Stephen B. 1968. “The Northeastern Thai Village: A Non-participatory Democracy.” Asian Survey 8, no. 11: 873–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar