Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:36:33.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

M. B. Hooker
M. B. Hooker
Affiliation:
Eliot College University of Kent at Canterbury

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communications
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , August 1973 , pp. 661 - 662
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1973

References

1Morrison, cf. Charles, “Munshis and Their Masters: The Organization of an Occupational Relationship in the Indian Legal System”, (1972) Journal of Asian Studies, XXXI, No. 2, pp. 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Known variously as “kerani” (clerk) or “petition writer.”

3 The terms “contact,” “expedite” are in common use.

4 Selangor Petition Writers Enactment No. 2/1957. Other state enactments which are substan tially similar in terms include the following: Kedah Petition Writers Enactment No. 75/1934; Johor Petition Writers Enactment No. 16/1938; Perlis Petition Writers Enactment No. 15/1354 and the Kelantan Petition Writers Enactment No. 23/1939.

5 Section 4 of the Selangor Petition Writers Enactment No. 2/1957.