Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T20:07:02.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Theology: Text and Practice in a Dalit Panther Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Get access

Extract

The bharatiya dalit panthers is an organization of Maharashtrian Dalits (ex-Untouchables) who have converted to Buddhism and adopted as their long-range political goal the establishment of a democratic socialist state. The ideology of the Panthers, embodied in their texts and practices, synthesizes threads of Buddhist and Marxist philosophies. Longstanding debates about the supposed incompatibility of Buddhism and Marxism pose questions regarding the conjunction of religion and politics in popular movements, the role of popular texts in constituting ideologies of resistance, and the ways texts and beliefs become transformed into actions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Ahir, D. C. 1990. The Legacy of Dr. Ambedkar. Delhi: B. R. Publishing.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays. London: New Left.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R. 1984. The Buddha and His Dhamma. Bombay: Siddharth Publication.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R. 1987. “Buddha or Karl Marx.” In Moon, Vasant, ed., Writings and Speeches, Vol. 3. Bombay: Government of Maharashtra.Google Scholar
Babb, Lawrence A. 1983. “Destiny and Responsibility: Karma in Popular Hinduism.” In Keyes, C. F. and Daniel, E. V., eds., Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, sumanta. 1980. India's Simmering Revolution: The Naxalite Uprising. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Benz, Ernst. 1966. Buddhism or Communism: Which Holds the Future of Asia? New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. 1969. The Sacred Canopy. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Berreman, Gerald D. 1979. Caste and Other Inequities: Essays on Inequality. Meerut: Folklore Institute.Google Scholar
Caplan, Lionel. 1987. “Introduction.” In Caplan, L., ed., Studies in Religious Fundamentalism. New York: SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contursi, Janet. 1989. “Militant Hindus and Buddhist Dalits: Hegemony and Resistance in an Indian Slum.” American Ethnologist 16, no. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Sheryl B. 1983. “The Tool Box Approach of the Tamil to the Issues of Moral Responsibility and Human Destiny.” In Keyes, C. F. and Daniel, E. V., eds., Karma. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gokhale-Turner, Jayashree. 1979. “The Dalit Panthers and the Radicalisation of the Untouchables.” The Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics XVII, no. 1:7793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1981. “Notes on Deconstructing ‘the Popular’.” In Samuel, R., ed., People's History and Socialist Theory. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1985. “Signification, Representation, Ideology: Althusser and the Post-Structuralist Debates.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 2, no. 2:91114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heesterman, J. C. 1985. The Inner Conflict of Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, Barbara R., ed. 1986. Untouchable! Voices of the Dalit Liberation Movement. London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Katz, Nathan, and Sowle, Stephen D.. 1987. “Theravada Buddhism and Marxism in the Postwar Era.” In Fu, Charles Wei-hsun and Spiegler, Gerhard E., eds., Movements and Issues in World Religions. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Keer, Dhananjay. 1981. Dr. Ambedkar: Life and Mission. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1983. “Introduction: The Study of Popular Ideas of Karma: Merit-Transference in the Kammic Theory of Popular Theravada Buddhism.” In Keyes, C. F. and Daniel, E. V., eds., Karma. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kolenda, Pauline. 1964. “Religious Anxiety and Hindu Fate.” In Harper, E. B., ed., Religion in South Asia. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Kolenda, Pauline. 1981. “Aspects of the Religion of the Untouchable Sweepers of Khalapur.” In Kolenda, P., ed., Caste, Cult and Hierarchy. Meerut: Folklore Institute.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Roger N. 1988. Thanks to God and the Revolution: Popular Religion and Class Consciousness in the New Nicaragua. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher. 1982. “The Cultural Civil War and the Crisis of Faith.” Katallagete 8, No. 1:1218.Google Scholar
Leach, E. R., ed. 1968. Dialectic in Practical Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ling, Trevor. 1966. Buddha, Marx, and God. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, David G. 1966. “Transcendental and Pragmatic Aspects of Religion.” American Anthropologist, 68, No. 5:1174–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1964. “Theses on Feuerbach.” In The German Ideology. Moscow: (1845) Progress.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1985. “Foreword.” In C. Schmitt, Political Theology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McHugh, Ernestine L. 1989. “Concepts of the Person among the Gurungs of Nepal.” American Ethnologist 16, No. 1:7586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murugkar, Lata. 1991. Dalit Panther Movement in Maharashtra. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1968. “Theodicy, Sin and Salvation in a Sociology of Buddhism.” In Leach, E. R., ed., Dialectic in Practical Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. 1986. “Some Reflections on the Hindu Tradition of Political Thought.” In Pantham, T. and Deutsch, K. L., eds., Political Thought in Modern India. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Parmar, Aradhana. 1987. Techniques of Statecraft: A Study of Kautilya's Arthasastra. Delhi: Atma Ram.Google Scholar
Riegelhaupt, Joyce F. 1973. “Festas and Padres: The Organization of Religious Action in a Portuguese Parish.” American Anthropologist 75, No. 3:835–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riegelhaupt, Joyce F. 1984. “Popular Anti-Clericalism and Religiosity in Pre—1974 Portugal.” In Wolf, E., ed., Religion, Power and Protest in Local Communities. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1985. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by Schwab, George. Cambridge, Mass., and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Jane, and Lindenbaum, Shirley, eds. 1987. “Frontiers of Christian Evangelism: Essays in Honor of Joyce Riegelhaupt.” American Ethnologist 14, No. 1:18.Google Scholar
Sharma, Ursula. 1973. “Theodicy and the Doctrine of Karma.” Man 8:347–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorat, S. K. 1982. “Passage to Adulthood: Perceptions from Below.” In Kakar, Sudhir, ed., Identity and Adulthood. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wadley, Susan S. 1983. “Vrats: Transformers of Destiny.” In Keyes, C. F. and Daniel, E. V., eds., Karma. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1964. The Sociology of Religion. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric, ed. 1984. Religion, Power and Protest in Local Communities. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelliot, Eleanor. 1970. “Learning the Use of Political Means: The Mahars of Maharashtra.” In Kothari, Rajni, ed., Caste in Indian Politics. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar