Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T03:13:21.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fragility of Liberal Democracy: A Schmittian Response to the Constitutional Crisis in South Korea (1948–79)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2022

Kyung Min Yi Open the ORCID record for Kyung Min Yi [Opens in a new window]
Kyung Min Yi*
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Governance, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
*
Email: epipony@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

What is the legal source of legitimacy in political authority? This pressing question made a striking appearance on the South Korean scene when, since its inception in 1948, a popular backlash against a liberal democracy perceived as foreign and unjuridical erupted in the forms of terror, insurgency, mutiny, and putsch. Park Chung Hee's successful assumption of power through his 1961 coup d’état provided an implicit response, recasting the Korean concepts of legality and legitimacy. Han T'ae Yŏn was a key figure in this national dispute. Armed with Carl Schmitt's canon, Han gave a decisive verdict on how Korean liberal democracy had been eclipsed under the two spuriously liberal governments of Syngman Rhee and Chang Myŏn. His legal apology for Park's authoritarian constitutional regime echoed Schmitt's defense of the Führer by invoking the president as an incarnation of the will of the people as a whole. This article intends to revisit Schmitt's accusation of judicial positivism for its failure to deliver a genuine voice of the people in the case of a non-Western society.

Keywords

Carl SchmittGroßraumHan T'ae YŏnKorean constitutionKorean liberal democracyPark Chung Heerepresentation versus identitysovereign and commissarial dictatorshipSyngman RheeYushin constitution
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , May 2022 , pp. 305 - 321
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Choi, Hyung-ik. 2008. “Constitutional Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt's Sovereign Dictatorship and the Yushin Constitution.” Han'gukchŏngch'iyŏn'gu [Journal of Korean politics] 17:241–69.Google Scholar
Chun, Gwang-suk. 2015. “A Study on Han Tae Yeon.” Hŏnbŏphagyŏn'gu [Korean journal of constitutional studies] 21:99–163.Google Scholar
Dicey, Albert Venn. [1885] 1959. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dull, Paul S. 1948. “South Korean Constitution.” Far Eastern Survey 17:205–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the “Two Treatises of Government.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fröhlich, Thomas. 2017. “From ‘Carl Schmitt on Mao’ to ‘Carl Schmitt in China’: Unsettled Issues and Unsettling Continuities.” In Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss in the Chinese-Speaking World: Reorienting the Political, edited by Marchal, Kai and Shaw, Carl K. Y., 61–80. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Guichard, Justine. 2017. “In the Name of the People: Disagreeing over Peoplehood in the North and South Korean Constitutions.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 4:405–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Sungjoo. 1974. The Failure of Democracy in South Korea. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1955. Hŏnbŏp [On constitution]. Seoul: Pŏmmunsa.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1956. “Chungnipchŏk kwŏllyŏgŭi ponjilgwa kach'i: han'gugŭi kŭndaegukkajŏk sŏnggyŏgŭi kyŏryŏe taehayŏ” [The neutral powers of a modern nation: On the lack of modernity of the Korean state]. Sasanggye [The world of thoughts] 4:24–27.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1957. “Haengjŏngŭn hanaŭi kisurida: kŭ kukkaŭi haengjŏnggujonŭn kŭ kungminŭi chŏngch'ijŏk sahoegujoe chonhaehago itta” [Administration is the art of statecraft: The state's administration hinges on the political and social structure]. Chaejŏng [Finance] 15:19–26.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1958a. “Han'guge isŏsŏŭi chayu” [The meaning of Korean liberty]. Sasanggye [The world of thoughts] 6:18–26.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1958b. “Kŭndae hŏnbŏbŭi chungsim munje” [Central questions of the modern constitution: The survival and values of the constitution]. Sasanggye [The world of thoughts] 8:33–41.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1960a. Sinhŏnbŏp [The new constitution]. Seoul: Pŏmmunsa.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1960b. “Uihoejuŭiŭi che munje” [Parliamentary questions]. Kukhoebo [Gazette of the National Assembly] 32:13–24.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1962a. “Hŏnpŏp kaejŏngŭl ŏttŏk'e hal kŏdin'ga?” [How to undertake the constitutional amendment?]. Supreme Council Review 6:12–17.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1962b. Kukka chaegŏn pisang choch'ibŏp [On the Emergency Law on National Reconstruction]. Seoul: Pŏmmunsa.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1963. “Sahoejŏkkibon'gwŏnegwanhayŏ” [On the social rights]. Kosigye [Gazette of the Korean bar] 10:56–60.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1973. “Han'gungminjujuŭiŭi Ironjŏk Palchŏn” [The theoretical development of Korean democracy]. Yusinjŏngu [The friends of yushin] 1:31–39.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1976. “The Task of [the] Yushin System in Korea.” Korea Observer 7:43–47.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1978. “Yusinhŏnbŏbŭi kwaje” [The task of the Yushin constitution]. Chŏngun [Military education] 55:31–41.Google Scholar
Han, T'ae Yŏn. 1995. “K'al Sumit’ŭwa P’ŭrangsŭ Hŏnbŏpsasang” [Carl Schmitt and French constitutional history]. Kosiyŏn'gu [Journal of the Korean bar] 259:76–92.Google Scholar
Han, Tong Sŏp. 1962. “The Theory of the Constituent Power.” Kosigye [Gazette of the Korean bar] 7:22–28.Google Scholar
Henderson, Gregory. 1968. Korea: The Politics of the Vortex. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, San Tŏk. 1961. Hyŏndaebŏpch’ŏrhagimmun [Modern jurisprudence]. Seoul: Pagyŏngsa.Google Scholar
Ingram, Alan. 2001. “Alexander Dugin: Geopolitics and Neo-fascism in Post-Soviet Russia.” Political Geography 20:1029–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kal, Pong Kŭn. 1974. Yusin Hŏnbŏmnon [On the Yushin constitution]. Seoul: Hyumgmin.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas. 2005. “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power.” Constellations 12 (2): 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Pyŏng Tu. 1961. Hyŏngmyŏngŏnbŏp [The revolutionary constitution]. Seoul: Dong-in.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl Su. 1964. “Kungmin as Bearer of Sovereignty: Implication and Change.” Kosigye [Gazette of the Korean bar] 9:34–42.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyo Chun, ed. 2003. Yusinhŏnbŏp Charyojip [Documents of the Yushin constitution]. Seoul: Korea Public Law Association.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyo Chun. 2019. K'alsumit’ŭŭihŏnbŏbiron'gwahan’guk [Carl Schmitt and South Korea]. Seoul: Sangini.Google Scholar
Kim, Il-Young. 2004. “The Race against Time: Disintegration of the Chang Myun Government and Aborted Democracy.” Review of Korean Studies 7:167–200.Google Scholar
Kim, Il-Young. 2010. Kŏn'gukkwa Puguk: Isŭngman·Pakchŏngŭi Sidaeŭi Chaejomyŏng [State building and wealth building]. Seoul: Kip'arang.Google Scholar
Kim, Ki Ch'un. 1972. “Yusinhŏnbŏphaesŏl” [Commentary on the Yushin constitution]. Kŏmch'al [Gazette of the Korean Prosecution Office] 48:37–113.Google Scholar
Kim, Yŏng Su. 2017. “Critical Reflection on the Doctrine of a Greater East-Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere.” In Tongasia Kaltŭngŭi Yŏksawa Chŏnmang [The history of East Asia's conflict], edited by Su, Lee Dong, 122–59. Goyang: Ingansarang.Google Scholar
Lee, Sang-Rok. 2016. “Revitalizing Reforms (Yushin) Constitution as a ‘Perpetuating State of Exception’ and the Discourse of Korean Democracy.” Yŏksabip'yŏng [Critical review of history] 35:511–55.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L., and Rivera, Jose Antonio Aguilar. 2000. “Liberalism and Emergency Powers in Latin America: Reflections on Carl Schmitt and the Theory of Constitutional Dictatorship.” Cardozo Law Review 21:1798–1823.Google Scholar
Ma, Sang Yun. 2014. Han'gugŭi Minjujuŭiwa Hanmigwan'gye [South Korean democracy and its relation with the US]. Seoul: National Museum of Korean Contemporary History.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 1997. “Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10:163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Home Affairs. 1972. Yusinhŏnbŏp Haesŏl [Commentaries on the Yushin constitution]. Seoul: Ministry of Home Affairs.Google Scholar
National Assembly Secretariat. 1962. Minutes of the Drafting Committee of the 1962 Constitution. Seoul: National Assembly Secretariat.Google Scholar
Ottolenghi, Emanuele. 2001. “Carl Schmitt and the Jewish Leviathan: The Supreme Court vs. the Sovereign Knesset.” Israel Studies 6:101–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Chan-Pyo. 1998. “Activities of the Constituent National Assembly: The Society and Politics under the Division and Cold War System and the Representative Democracy.” In Han'guk hyŏndaesaŭi chaeinsik [Rethinking modern Korean history], edited by the Academy of Korean Studies, 289–362. Seoul: Oreum.Google Scholar
Park, Il Kyung. 1964. “Kungmin as Bearer of Sovereignty.” Kosigye [Gazette of the Korean bar] 6:24–30.Google Scholar
Park, Myung-Rim and Hahm, Yang Seung. 2010. Han'guktaet’ongnyŏng T'ongch’isaryojip: Pakchŏngŭi 1 [Presidential papers of Park Chung Hee 1]. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton. [1948] 2017. Constitutional Dictatorship: Crisis Government in the Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. [1923] 1985. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Translated by Kennedy, Ellen. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. [1932] 2004. Legality and Legitimacy. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. [1923] 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by Schwab, George. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. [1939] 2011. “Großraum versus Universalism: The International Legal Struggle over Monroe Doctrine.” In Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt: Geographies of the Nomos, edited by Legg, Stephen, 46–53. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. [1928] 2014. Dictatorship: From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to Proletarian Class Struggle. Translated by Hoelzl, Michael and Ward, Graham. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2015. The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Translated by Vinx, Lars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shim, Ji Yeon. 2013. Han'gukchŏngdangjŏngch'isa: Wigiwa T'ongabŭi Chŏngch'i [The Korean political parties: Crisis and coalition]. Seoul: Paeksan.Google Scholar
Suh, Hee-Kyung. 2020. Han'gukhŏnjŏngsa [Korean constitutional history]. Seoul: Forum.Google Scholar
Skya, Walter. 2009. Japan′s Holy War: The Ideology of Radical Shinto Ultranationalism. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Wŏn Hyŏng. 1973. “On Yushin.” Dong-A Daily, May 28.Google Scholar
Yu, Chin O. 1949. Hŏnbŏbŭigich'oiron [The basic theory of the constitution]. Seoul: Iljogak.Google Scholar
Yu, Chin O. 1954. Hŏnbŏbŭi iron'gwa silchae [Constitution in theory and practice]. Seoul: Ilchogak.Google Scholar
Yu, Chin O and Korea University Museum. 2009. Hyŏnminyujinochehŏnhŏnbŏpkwan'gyecharyojip [Documents for Yu Chin O's writing of the 1948 constituent constitution]. Seoul: Korea University Press.Google Scholar