Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:02:47.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE IRON AGE IN WEST CENTRAL AFRICA: RADIOCARBON DATES FROM CORISCO ISLAND (EQUATORIAL GUINEA)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2016

MANUEL SÁNCHEZ-ELIPE LORENTE ,
ALFREDO GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL Open the ORCID record for ALFREDO GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL [Opens in a new window] ,
JESÚS F. JORDÁ PARDO  and
CARLOS MARÍN SUÁREZ
MANUEL SÁNCHEZ-ELIPE LORENTE
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Complutense University of Madrid
ALFREDO GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL
Affiliation:
Institute of Heritage Sciences, Spanish National Research Council (Incipit-CSIC)
JESÚS F. JORDÁ PARDO
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, National University for Distance Education (UNED)
CARLOS MARÍN SUÁREZ
Affiliation:
Independent Researcher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the last few decades the number of radiocarbon dates available for West Central Africa has increased substantially, even though it is still meagre compared with other areas of the continent. In order to contribute to a better understanding of the Iron Age of this area we present and analyze a total of 22 radiocarbon dates obtained from sites from the island of Corisco (Equatorial Guinea). By comparing them with those from Equatorial Guinea, southern Cameroon, and coastal Gabon and Congo we intend to clarify the picture of the West Central African Iron Age and propose a more accurate archaeological sequence.

Keywords

Equatorial GuineaGabonCongoCameroonEquatorial AfricaCentral Africaarchaeologyprecolonialritualmethod
Type
New Archaeological Data from Atlantic Africa
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 345 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Funding for radiocarbon dating was provided by the Spanish Ministry of Culture (Archaeology Abroad Program, 2010 and 2011). The Consolider INGENIO 2010 TCP Program funded research determining two of the dates.

References

1 González-Ruibal, A., Gelabert, L. Picornell, and Mañé, A. Valenciano, ‘Early Iron Age burials from Equatorial Guinea: the sites of Corisco Island’, Journal of African Archaeology, 9:1 (2011), 41–66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 González-Ruibal, A., Lorente, M. Sánchez-Elipe, and Vilariño, C. Otero, ‘An ancient and common tradition: funerary rituals and society in Equatorial Guinea (first–twelfth centuries AD)’, African Archaeological Review, 30 (2013), 115–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 González-Ruibal, A., Gelabert, L. Picornell, and Sánchez-Elipe, M., ‘Colonial encounters in Spanish Equatorial Africa (eighteenth–twentieth centuries)’, in Montón-Subías, S., Berrocal, M. Cruz, and Ruiz, A. (eds.), Archaeologies of Early Modern Spanish Colonialism (New York, 2015), pp. 175–202 Google Scholar.

4 González-Ruibal, A, Marín, C., Otero, C., Picornell, L., and Sánchez-Elipe, M., ‘Excavaciones arqueológicas en la isla de Corisco (Guinea Ecuatorial): Campaña de 2012’, Informes y Trabajos: Excavaciones en el exterior 2011, 09 (2013), 243–60Google Scholar, (http://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/79077).

5 Meister, C. and Eggert, M. K. H., ‘On the Early Iron Age in southern Cameroon: the sites of Akonétye’, Journal of African Archaeology, 6:2 (2008), 183–202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Meister, C., ‘Remarks on Early Iron Age burial sites from southern Cameroon’, African Archaeological Review, 27 (2010), 237–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Clist, B., ‘1991 excavations and laboratory work in Gabon’, Nyame Akuma, 37 (1992), 4–8 Google Scholar; Clist, B., ‘Nouvelles données archéologiques sur l'histoire ancienne de la Guinée-Équatoriale’, L'Anthropologie, 102:2 (1998), 213–17Google Scholar.

7 Clist, ‘1991 excavations’; Clist, ‘Nouvelles données archéologiques’; Fagan, B. M., ‘Radiocarbon dates for sub-Saharan Africa: V’, The Journal of African History, 8:3 (1967), 513–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar. To the dates already known we have added two more that were provided by Antonio Rubinos, member of the Laboratory of Geochronology of Instituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, CSIC. Those dates were obtained in the 1970s but have not been published before.

8 González-Ruibal et al., ‘Early Iron burials’; González-Ruibal et al., ‘An ancient and common tradition’.

9 Clist, B., Gabon: 100,000 ans d'Histoire (Libreville, 1995)Google Scholar.

10 Denbow, J., ‘Pride, prejudice, plunder and preservation: archaeology and the re-envisioning of the ethnogenesis on the Loango coast of the Republic of Congo’, Antiquity, 86:383–408 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Mestres, J. S., ‘La datació per radiocarboni i el calibratge de les dates radiocarbóniques: objectius, problemes i aplicaciones’, Revista d'Arqueologia de Ponent, 5 (1995), 260–75Google Scholar; Mestres, J. S., ‘La datació per radiocarboni: una visión actual’, Tribuna d'Arqueologia, 1997–1998 (2000), 195–239 Google Scholar; Mestres, J. S. and Nicolás, J. C., ‘Contribución de la datación por radiocarbono al establecimiento de la cronología absoluta de la prehistoria menorquina’, Caesaraugusta, 73 (1997), 237–341 Google Scholar.

12 June 2007 version, (http://www.calpal.de).

13 Weninger, B. and Jöris, O., ‘Glacial radiocarbon calibration: the CalPal Program’, in Higham, T., Ramsey, Ch. Bronk, and Owen, C. (eds.), Radiocarbon and Archaeology: Fourth International Symposium, Oxford 2002 (Oxford, 2004), 9–15 Google Scholar; Weninger, B., Jöris, O., and Danzeglocke, U., Glacial Radiocarbon Age Conversion: Cologne Radiocarbon Calibration and Palaeoclimate Research Package <CALPAL> User Manual (Köln, 2013)Google Scholar, (http://www.calpal.de).

14 See, for example, Van der Leeuw, S., ‘Giving the potter a choice’, in Lemonnier, P. (ed.), Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures Since the Neolithic (London, 1993), 238–88Google Scholar.

15 B. Clist, Gabon, 164–74.

16 What we have called Nandá tradition corresponds with Clist's Group II, which was, according to him, a groupe d'attente (literally ‘waiting group’, meaning temporary category) until a better preserved site was excavated. We decided to rename that tradition with the place name of the area where the largest Group II site has been found so far: the grasslands site of Nandá. From here on we will use the term Nandá.

17 Clist, Gabon, 164–7, 176–9.

18 We were able to assert that those pits were burials and not ritual deposits because some bone fragments were preserved stuck to the iron objects thanks to iron corrosion, as can be seen in González-Ruibal et al., ‘An ancient and common tradition’, 124, Fig. 8. The rest of the burials did not provide any human remains but the acidity of rainforest soil inhibits organic preservation.

19 B. Clist, ‘Des premiers villages aux premiers europeens autour de l'Estuaire du Gabon: quatre millenaires d'interactions entre l'homme et son milieu’ (unpublished PhD thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2004), 564, tableau 7–4.

20 González-Ruibal et al., ‘An ancient and common tradition’. See also Meister, ‘Remarks on Early Iron Age burial sites’.

21 Clist, Gabon, 167–8, 178–9.

22 González-Ruibal et al., ‘An ancient and common tradition’, 138.

23 González-Ruibal et al., ‘Excavaciones arqueológicas’, 253–4.

24 González-Ruibal et al., ‘An ancient and common tradition’, 139.

25 Clist, Gabon, 168.

26 Ibid . 176–9.

27 We have deliberately omitted the Yaoundé-Obobogo site as there were no radiocarbon dates provided.

28 Meister and Eggert, ‘On the Early Iron Age’; Meister, ‘Remarks on Early Iron Age burial sites’.

29 Meister, ‘Remarks on Early Iron Age burial sites’, 237–8.

30 Ibid . 246–7.

31 The lack of plans for the Mpoengu pits prevents us from ascertaining whether a full body without excarnation could have been interred in them. The layout of the pits and distribution of finds in the negative features of Akonetyé, instead, allow us to interpret them as graves with primary interments.

32 Meister and Eggert, ‘On the Early Iron Age’, 194.

33 Ibid . 188, 195.

34 Denbow, ‘Pride, prejudice, plunder’, 383–408; Denbow, J., The Archaeology and Ethnography of Central Africa (Cambridge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Denbow, ‘Pride, prejudice, plunder’, 397.

36 Ibid . 398–9.

37 Denbow, The Archaeology, 123, 128, 131.

38 We are not absolutely sure of this association since the sherd we refer is not drawn but photographed (Denbow, ‘Pride, prejudice, plunder’, 401, Fig. 12).

39 Denbow, The Archaeology, 138–44.

40 Denbow, ‘Pride, prejudice, plunder’, 402–3; Denbow, The Archaeology, 150.

41 Clist, ‘Nouvelles données archéologiques’.

42 Clist, B., ‘1985 fieldwork in Gabon’, Nyame Akuma, 28 (1987), 6–9 Google Scholar; Clist, ‘Nouvelles données archéologiques’, 215.

43 del Molino, A. Martín, ‘Tipología de la cerámica de Fernando Poo’, Estudios del Instituto Claretiano de Africanistas (Separata de la revista ‘La Guinea Española’) (1960), I, 11–36 Google Scholar.

44 del Molino, A. Martín, Etapas de la cultura Carboneras de Fernando Poo en el primer milenio de nuestra Era (Madrid, 1968)Google Scholar.

45 delMolino, A. Martín, ‘Secuencia cultural en el Neolítico de Fernando Poo’, Trabajos de Prehistoria, (1965), 28, Fig. 10, B1Google Scholar.

46 Clist, ‘Nouvelles données archéologiques’, 214, Fig. 1.

47 Neither the bracelets nor the pottery sherds have been published to date, but they were showed to one of us by Bernard Clist at the Royal Museum of Central Africa, Tervuren.

48 González-Ruibal et al., ‘Early Iron burials’, 51, 55.

49 Hill, J. D. and Cumberpatch, C. G. (eds.), Different Iron Ages, Studies on the Iron Age in Britain and Ireland: Recent Trends (Sheffield, 1995)Google Scholar.

50 Guyer, J. I., ‘Indigenous currencies and the history of marriage payments: a case study from Cameroon’, Cahiers d’Études africaines, 26:104 (1986), 577–610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tessmann, G., Los pamues (los fang): Monografía etnológica de una rama de las tribus negras del África occidental (Madrid, 2003 [orig. pub. 1913]), 535–7Google Scholar; Papakirillou, I., A Metallurgical Study of West African Iron Monies from Cameroon and Liberia (Boston, 2009)Google Scholar.

51 Oslisly, R., White, L., Bentaleb, I., Favier, C., Fontugne, M., Gillet, J. F., and Sebag, D., ‘Climatic and cultural changes in the west Congo Basin forests over the past 5,000 years’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 368(1625):20120304 (2013), 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Wotzka, H. P., ‘Records of activity: radiocarbon and the structure of Iron Age settlement in Central Africa’, in Wotzka, H. P. (ed.), Grundlegunge: Beiträge zur europäischen und afrikanischen Archäologie für Manfred K. H. Eggert (Tübingen, 2006), 281–2Google Scholar.

53 Ibid . 281.

54 Marcén, P. González; Lull, V., and Risch, R., Arqueología de Europa, 2250–1200 AC: una introducción a la ‘Edad del Bronce’ (Madrid, 1992)Google Scholar.

55 Admittedly, the excesses of culture history have led to the marginalization of ethnicity in archaeological discourses, as pointed out by Richard and MacDonald, who argue for more nuanced and complex models of ethnic identity. Richard, F. and MacDonald, K., ‘From invention to ambiguity: the persistence of ethnicity in Africa’, in Richard, F. and MacDonald, K. (eds.), Ethnic Ambiguity and the African Past: Materiality, History, and the Shaping of Cultural Identities (Walnut Creek, CA, 2015), 17–54 Google Scholar.

56 Eggert, M., ‘The Bantu problem and African archaeology’, in Stahl, A. B. (ed.), African Archaeology: A Critical Introduction (Malden, 2005), 301–26Google Scholar; De Maret, P., ‘Archaeologies of the Bantu expansion’, in Mitchell, P. and Lane, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of African Archaeology (Oxford, 2013), 627–43Google Scholar.

57 Denbow, ‘Pride, prejudice, plunder’, 405.

58 Bawden, G., The Moche (Cambridge and Oxford, 1996), 97 Google Scholar; Jackson, M., Moche Art and Visual Culture in Ancient Peru (Albuquerque, 2008), 38–42 Google Scholar; Edwards, D. N., The Nubian Past: an Archaeology of the Sudan (London, 2004), 96–7Google Scholar; Aranda, G., Montón-Subías, S., Sánchez-Romero, M., and Alarcón, E., ‘Death and everyday life: the Argaric societies from southeast Iberia’, Journal of Social Archaeology, 9:2 (2009), 144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Lemonnier, P., ‘The study of material culture today: toward an anthropology of technical systems’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5 (1986), 147–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 See, for example, Nerín, G., Corisco y el estuario del Muni (1470–1931): del aislamiento a la globalización y de la globalización a la marginación (Harmattan, Paris, 2015)Google Scholar.

61 See, for example, A. Gallay, E. Huysecom, A. Mayor, and G. Ceuninck, Hier et aujourd'hui: des poteries et des femmes: ceramiques traditionnelles du Mali, Documents du Departement d'Anthropologie et d’Écologie de l'Université de Geneve 22, Geneva (1996); Gosselain, O. P., ‘Materializing identities: an African perspective’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7:3 (2000), 187–217, 206CrossRefGoogle Scholar.