Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T15:17:50.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frobenius in West African History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

J. M. Ita
J. M. Ita
Affiliation:
University of Ife
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The article as a whole argues that the observations of Leo Frobenius in West Africa between 1907 and 1912, though they are commonly ignored by Anglo-American archaeologists and anthropologists, contain material which is of value to the historian of early twentieth-century West Africa. The author examines Frobenius's methods and observations in the light of his own statements (some of them in works which have not been translated into English or French) and suggests various outside sources which could be used to check the reliability of Frobenius's accounts.

The attitude of Anglo-American anthropologists is explained in terms of developments in anthropological theory since the First World War.

The article examines the defects of Frobenius's anthropological method, as exemplified by his work among the Kabré of North Togo shortly after their ‘pacification’ by the Germans; and suggests that the observations themselves may be more reliable than Frobenius's method would lead one to expect.

The article then considers Frobenius's archaeological method as exemplified by his work in Ife, argues that he was somewhat unscrupulous in forcing the sale of artefacts, and also, that by failing to keep adequate site records or even to supervise the digging himself, he destroyed a considerable amount of archaeological evidence at Ife. Historians should, however, study his work in Ife to note where such destruction has taken place, and what kind of evidence has been destroyed.

The article suggests outside sources, both oral and written, which might enable historians to check the veracity of Frobenius's account of his own method, and also the reliability of the observations themselves. Finally, it is suggested that an assessment of the reliability of his observations in Togo and Nigeria might be generally indicative of the reliability of his observation throughout West Africa in the period 1907–12.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1972 , pp. 673 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 E.g. Kalous, Milan, ‘Some Hypotheses about the Art of Southern Nigeria’ in Afrika und Übersee, 1969. Bd. LII, Heft 2, and ‘Frobenius, Wilett and Ife’ in theGoogle ScholarJ. Afr. Hist. IX (1968), no. 4. For a bibliography of Frobenius's work up to 1932, see ‘Das Schrifttum von Leo Frobenius’ contained in Leo Frobenius: ein Lebenswerk aus cier Zeit der Kulturwende (Leipzig, 1933) compiled by Rhotert, van den Steinen and others. For a more recent bibliography see that at the end ofGoogle ScholarKretschmar's, FredaLeo Frobenius (Cyclostyled. Inter Nationes, 1968).Google Scholar

2 Kalous, Some Hypotheses…, 118, and ‘Frobenius, Wilett and Ife’, 661.Google Scholar

3 Frobenius, , Und Afrika Sprach … (Volksausgabe), 2 vols. (Vita, Deutsches Verlagshaus, Berlin–Charlottenburg, 1912–1913), 1, 319–20. (This is the German popular edition. The same publisher also produced the scholarly edition (Wissenschaftlich erweiterte Ausgabe) containing much additional material and appearing in 3 volumes. Unfortunately, the English translationGoogle ScholarThe Voice of Africa, trans. Blind, Rudolf (Hutchinson, London, 1913) is a translation only of the popular edition, and most of the material contained in vol. of the German scholarly edition is omitted. Elsewhere in this article my quotations are from the German scholarly edition—abbreviated UAS.)Google Scholar

4 1n Modes of Thought, eds. Horton, Robin and Murray, Ruth (Faber and Faber. Forthcoming).Google Scholar

5 See note 3 above.Google Scholar

6 UAS, III, 5–6.Google Scholar

7 UAS, III, loc. cit.Google Scholar

8 Frobenius, The Voice of Africa, 1, 186–7.Google Scholar

9 Frobenius, , Schicksaiskunde (Weimar, 1938), 163.Google ScholarDas Unbekannte Afrika (Beck, Munich, 1923), 79, and Vom Kulturreich des Festlandes (Wegweiser Verlag, Berlin, 1923), 118.Google Scholar

10 Richards, Audrey, ‘Bronislav Malinowski’ in The Founding Fathers of Social Science (ed. Raison, Timothy). Penguin Books (1969), 189.Google Scholar See also Benedict, Ruth, Patterns of Culture (Mentor Books Reprint, 1953), 44.Google Scholar

11 Frobenius writes: ‘Since no people is without contacts an exchange generally takes place at the [cultural] boundaries. Thus a culture can gradually spread [literally “seep”] further without any significant movement of peoples.’ Frobenius, , Erlebte Erdteile: Ergebnisse eines deutschen Forscherlebens (abbreviated EE.), 7 vols. (Societäts-Verlag, Frankfurt, 1925–1930), 1, 270. See also IV, 372.Google Scholar

12 Richards, Audrey, op. cit. 189–90.Google Scholar

13 Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., The Andanzan Islanders, first published 1932 (New York, 1964), vii.Google Scholar See also Bidney, David, Theoretical Anthropology (Columbia University Press, 1953), 284 and John Beattie, ‘A. R. Radcliffe-Brown’ in Timothy Raison, op. cit. 180.Google Scholar

14 See Bidney, op. cit. 198, 248 and 249.Google Scholar

15 Malinowski, Bronislav (ed. Kaberry, Phyllis) The Dynamics of Culture Change (New Haven, 1945), 36.Google Scholar

16 Richards, Audrey, op. cit. 189.Google Scholar

17 Frobenius, , Atlantis: Volksmäerchn und Volksdichtungen Afrikas, 12 vols. (Eugen Diederichs Verlag, Jena. 1921–1928), IX (VolkserAhlungen und Volksdichtungen aus dem Zentral-Sudan), 7.Google Scholar

18 EE., III, 32.Google Scholar

19 EE. III, 33.Google Scholar

20 Cornevin, Robert, 'La Connaissance des Kabré depuis Frobénius’ in Le Monde Nonchrétien, no. 59–60 (Juillet-Décembre, 1961), 95.Google Scholar

21 See note above.Google Scholar

22 Delord, Jacques, in Le Monde Non-chrétien, no. 59–60, 98.Google Scholar

23 Delord, ibid. 172.

24 Frobenius, , Auf dem Wege nach Atlantis; Bericht über den Verlauf der zweiten Reiseperiode der DIAFE in den Jahren 1908–10 (Vita, Deutaches Verlagshaus, Berlin-Charlottenburg, 1911), 11.Google Scholar

25 UAS. 1, 49.Google Scholar

26 Frobenius, and Obermaier, , Hadschra Maktuba: Urzeitliche Feisbilder Kleinafrikas (abbreviated HM). (Akademische Druck-und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, 1963), 2. (This is a photo-mechanical reprint of the edition published by the Kurt Wolff Verlag, Munich, in 1925).Google Scholar

27 UAS. 1, 50.Google Scholar

28 Partridge, Charles, the Acting Resident, had formerly been stationed on the Cross River. He was a Fellow of the Royal Anthropological Society and author of a book entitled Cross River Natives; being some notes on the primitive pagans of Obubra Hill district, Southern Nigeria; including a description of the circle of upright stones on the left bank of the Aweyong River (Hutchinson, London, 1905).Google Scholar

29 UAS. 1, 68–9, 105–6, 112–26.Google Scholar

30 After leaving Ife once, Frobenius was recalled by Partridge, and had to return to Ife where his collection was inspected. The occasion here referred to is his first, not his final departure.Google Scholar

31 UAS. 1, 81.Google Scholar

32 UAS. 1, 100.Google Scholar

33 UAS. 1, 102.Google Scholar

34 It has been variously suggested that the Head of Olokun now in Nigeria is a copy. See Underwood, Leon, The Bronzes of West Africa (Tiranti, London, 1949), 3, andGoogle ScholarUnderwood, Leon and Fagg, William, ‘An Examination of the so-called Olokun Head of Ife, Nigeria’ in Man, XLIX (1949), 1–7. It seems at least possible that Frobenius, on being recalled to Ife, left a copy in Ife and kept the original, though if so, the question of what happened to the original afterwards is obscure.Google Scholar

35 UAS. 1, 88.Google Scholar

36 See Harris, Marvin, The Rise of Anthropological Theory (Routledge, Kegan and Paul, London, 1968), 146.Google Scholar

37 Hair, P. E. H., in a letter published in Ibadan, July 1970, 102. Hair suggests that Frobenius would have had ample opportunity of making a copy of the Olokun Head.Google Scholar