Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:06:19.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conflict and Power in Nineteenth-Century Namibia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Brigitte Lau
Brigitte Lau
Affiliation:
Windhoek State Archives
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In explaining how one Oorlam group, the Afrikaners, lost their hegemony in Namaland in the 1860s, this article examines the impact on this region of Oorlam migrations, trade with the Cape and the advent of Christian missionaries. The kinship-based social organization of Nama pastoralists was largely replaced by the ‘commando’ organization, introduced by the Oorlams. By the 1850s, production throughout Namaland was geared less to subsistence than to the demands of Cape traders for cattle, skins and ivory. Raiding and hunting, with imported guns and horses, supplanted local traditions of good husbandry. While foreign traders made large profits, commando groups were locked into a cycle of predatory and competitive expansion. By the early 1860s, such conflict had polarised; the Afrikaners and their allies (including Herero client-chiefs) confronted several Nama/Oorlam chiefs and an army raised by a Cape trader, Andersson. The ensuing battles were not, as has been claimed, a Herero ‘war of liberation’; instead, they marked the replacement of Afrikaner by European hegemony; the country was freer than ever before to be controlled by agents of merchant capital and colonialism.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 1986 , pp. 29 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vedder, E.G. H., South West Africa in Olden Times (London, 1938), 325–391.Google Scholar

2 Goldblatt, E.G. I., History of South West Africa (Cape Town, 1971), 31–34.Google Scholar

3 Legassick, M., ‘The northern frontier to 1820: the emergence of the Griqua people’, in Elphick, R. and Giliomee, H. (eds.), The Shaping of South African Society, 1652–1820 (London, 1979), 243–290Google Scholar; Bruyn, J. Du, ‘The Oorlam Afrikaners: from dependence to dominance, c. 1760–1823’ (unpublished paper, University of South Africa, 1981)Google Scholar; Bradlow, E., ‘The significance of arms and ammunition on the Cape's northern frontier at the turn of the 18th century’, Historia, xxvi, i (1981), 59–68.Google Scholar

4 Legassick, , ‘Northern frontier’, 262Google Scholar; Bradlow, E., ‘Petrus Pienaar: ruffian or courageous pioneer?’, Quarterly Bulletin of the South African Library, xxxiv, iii (1980).Google Scholar

5 Ebner, J., Reise nach Südafrika (Berlin, 1829)Google Scholar; Transactions of the London Missionary Society, iv (1817), 162.Google Scholar Apparently the influx of Oorlams from the Cape continued throughout most of the nineteenth century; cases in point are the Witboois, settling at Gibeon only in 1863, and the Basters, establishing themselves in Rehoboth in 1870.

6 Shaw, B., ‘A short account of the Great Namaquas’, Wesleyan Missionary Notices, III (1821), 119.Google Scholar

7 Transactions of the L.M.S., iv (1817), 324–325Google Scholar; Cape Archives (CA), L.M.S. Journals, Schmelen, 1816, p. 21; 1819, p. 8.

8 Shaw, , ‘Short Account’, 120.Google ScholarGuy, Cf. Jeff, The Destruction of the Zulu Kingdom (London, 1980), ch. 2, for a lucid analysis of such reciprocity.Google Scholar

9 Transactions of the L.M.S., III (1812), 212Google Scholar; Campbell, J., Travels in South Africa (London, 1815), 308.Google Scholar

10 CA, L.M.S. Letters, A. Albrecht, ‘Observations’, n.d. (c. 1809).

11 Lau, B., ‘The emergence of Kommando politics in Namaland, southern Namibia, 1800–1870’ (M.A. thesis, University of Cape Town, 1982), 114–120.Google Scholar

12 CA, L.M.S. Journals, Kitchingman (wrongly marked: Wimmer?), 1820, p. 3.; Albrecht, 4 Feb. 1809; Schmelen, 1815–16, pp. 26–28; Moffat, R., Missionary Labours and Scenes in Southern Africa (London, 1842; reprinted 1969), 76.Google Scholar

13 Ebner, , Reise, ch. 21. Wesleyan Missionary Notices, 1822, pp. 337–338Google Scholar; CA, L.M.S. Letters, Albrecht, 1806–9; Moffat, , Missionary Labours, 76 and n. 10.Google Scholar

14 Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 64–68.Google Scholar

15 CA, L.M.S. Letters, Schmelen, 26 Sept. 1822; Shaw, , ‘Short account’, 277–278Google Scholar; Broadbent, S., The Missionary Martyr in Namaqualand (London, 1857).Google Scholar

16 Transactions of the L.M.S., iv (1817), 323–326.Google Scholar

17 Palgrave's evidence, CA, G/H 21/19, Q.No. 1151; Schmelen's reference to his visit of the Windhoek area in 1825, in Moritz, E., ‘Die ältesten Reiseberichte über Deutsch Südwestafrika’, Mitteilungen aus den deutschen Schutzgebieten, XXVIII (1915), Heft 4, 221–222Google Scholar (hereafter ‘Reiseberichte I’).

18 Lau, Cf., ‘Kommando polities’, 232–236.Google Scholar

19 Schmelen to Kitchingman, 28 March 1828, in Le Cordeur, B. and Saunders, C. (eds.), The Kitchingman Papers (Johannesburg, 1976), 95.Google Scholar

20 Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 188 and map 3Google Scholar; Windhoek National Archives (WA), ‘Quellen zur Geschichte Südwestafrikas’ (hereafter ‘Quellen’), 3, p. 63.

21 Lau, Cf., ‘Kommando polities’, ch. 5.Google Scholar

22 Cook, E., The Modern Missionary (Liverpool, 1842), 62, 75Google Scholar; CA, L.M.S. Journals, Schmelen 1816, p. 32; Cook, to Backhouse, , 24 Aug. 1840, in Moritz, , ‘Reiseberichte’, Mitteilungen aus den deutschen Schutzgebieten, XXIX (1916), 239 (hereafter ‘Reiseberichte II’)Google Scholar; Tindall, J., The Journal of Joseph Tindall (Cape Town, 1959), 30, 129Google Scholar; Transactions of the L.M.S., III (1812), 427Google Scholar; Berichte der Rheinischen Missionsgesellschaft (BRMG), 1852, p. 29Google Scholar; 1853, pp. 37, 379.

23 Lau, B. (ed.) Carl Hugo Hahn Tagebücher, 1837–1860 (Windhoek, 1984-5), HI, 589–590Google Scholar; WA, Andersson Papers, I, 6 Feb. 1851, II, 7 April 1852; Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 101.Google Scholar

24 Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 97–99Google Scholar; Cook, , Modern Missionary, 53Google Scholar; CA, G/H 14/1, Abram Bondel to Governor, 8 Aug. 1838, 26 Aug. 1845.

25 ‘Quellen’, 3, 15 Oct. 1853; Kleinschmidt, , 1843, in Moritz, ‘Reiseberichte II’, 224Google Scholar; Lau, Cf., ‘Kommando polities’, 102, 103, 132–137.Google Scholar

26 BRMG, 1863, pp. 274–279.Google Scholar

27 Cordeur, Le and Saunders, , Kitchingman Papers, 71Google Scholar; Loth, H.: Die christliche Mission in Südwestafrika (Berlin, 1963), 18.Google Scholar

28 For the Rehoboth constitution, see ‘Quellen’, 30 (Law for Rehoboth), 25 Aug. 1849; Lau, ‘Kommando polities’, 105, 154. The most detailed seems to have been that for the commando at Bethany: cf. ‘Ryksboek, bevattende alle wetten en regten van het Kapiteinskap te Bethanië, bestaande uit drie Boeken: I. Het Boek der Ryks-Geskiedenis; 2. Het Bok der Wetten; 3. Het Boek van Aanmerkingen’, TS. in WA, A. 8; original (temporarily lost) in archives of Evangelical Lutheran Church (ELC), Windhoek.

29 Cook, , Modern Missionary, 15.Google Scholar

30 BRMG, 1858, p. 108; 1863, p. 272; 1866, p. 276; 1867, p. 357; Tindall, , Journal, 58 n.Google Scholar

31 Cf. ‘Quellen’, 3, 25 Oct. 1844; 30, 17 Nov. 1851 (Kleinschmidt).

32 BRMG, 1852, p. 211.Google Scholar

33 Amraal's name may have been derived from ‘Admiral’: Tindall, Cf., Journal, 58.Google Scholar

34 Cook, , 1840, in Moritz, ‘Reiseberichte II’, 239Google Scholar; Cook, , Modern Missionary, 119.Google Scholar

35 Lau, Cf., ‘Kommando polities’, 114–20.Google Scholar

36 See Lau, , Hahn Tagebücher, II, 424, 433, 511–12; III, 602Google Scholar; Hahn, , 1846, in Moritz, ‘Reiseberichte II’ 209Google Scholar; CA, G/H 19/10, Chapman memo. 1865; BRMG, 1863, p. 341Google Scholar; WA, Andersson Papers, n, 9 Feb. 1852.

37 BRMG, 1862, p. 38Google Scholar; Galton, F., The Narrative of an Explorer in Tropical South Africa (London, 1853), 70Google Scholar; Andersson noted that in 1840 Windhoek was a ‘crowded, bustling market the whole year round’: WA, Andersson Papers, I, 6 Feb. 1851.

38 CA G/H 19/10, Chapman memo. 1865; also Von Moltke, J., ‘Der Mythos vom Unabhängigkeitskrieg der Herero und die Häuptlingswürde Anderssons’, Afrikanischer Heimatkalender (Windhoek, 1973), 33–44.Google Scholar

39 Lau, , Hahn Tagebücher, II, 294, 358; IV, 965Google Scholar; Werner, W., ‘An exploratory investigation into the mode of production of the Herero in pre-colonial Namibia to ca. 1870’ (B.Soc.Sc. (Hons.) thesis, University of Cape Town, 1980)Google Scholar; also n. 81 below.

40 When Hahn wanted to travel through Hereroland in 1846, Jonker Afrikaner prevented him, alleging that Hahn wished only to look for springs which he, Jonker, wished to exploit first: Lau, , Hahn Tagebücher, II, 324.Google ScholarThe Rehobothers were also constantly looking for surface water: BRMG, 1854, pp. 149 ff.Google Scholar

41 For Berseba, BRMG, 1854, p. 113; 1858, p. 158; on the veld of Bethany, ‘Quellen’, 10 June 1853, 29 Dec. 1862. By 1862 all mission stations in Namaland were collectively called ‘bad’, even though missionaries had originally ensured that water, springs and pasture were abundant. ELC Konferenzprotokolle, June 1861, para. 3.

42 BRMG, 1861, p. 72Google Scholar; ‘Quellen’, 3, 29 March 1848; 5, 2 July 1851; 23 Nov. 1854.Google Scholar

43 Cook, , Modern Missionary, 119, 163, 165–166Google Scholar; Tindall, , Journal, 38, 98Google Scholar; Galton, , Narrative, 225Google Scholar; BRMG, 1848, pp. 97–102Google Scholar; ELC Konferenzprotokolle, March 1856, para. 15.

44 The missionaries noticed this, even if they were unaware of underlying causes. Cf. BRMG, 1852, p. 28; for a detailed discussion, see Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 146–183.Google Scholar

46 BRMG, 1849, p. 317; 1862, p. 22; 1865, p. 179Google Scholar; Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 191–192.Google Scholar

46 Tindall, , Journal, 92Google Scholar; Loth, , Christliche Mission, 31–34Google Scholar; Ebner, , Reise, 298.Google Scholar

47 Scheppman, , 1846, in Moritz, ‘Reiseberichte II’, 240Google Scholar; ‘Quellen’, 5, April 1858.Google Scholar

48 Lau, Cf., ‘Kommando polities’, 196–198.Google Scholar

49 For accounts of such work see WA, Andersson Papers, x (x); Knudsen, , ‘Notizen’, n.d. (c. 1845) in South African Library, Cape Town (Grey Collection)Google Scholar; BRMG, 1849, P. 313.Google Scholar

50 Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 202–203.Google Scholar

51 Cf. ‘Quellen’, 3, p. 63.

52 Ebner, Cf., Reise, 132.Google Scholar

53 BRMG, 1855, pp. 24–29, 51–58, 376–379; 1856, p. 347.Google Scholar

54 BRMG, 1855, p. 62; 1856, p. 132.Google Scholar Hahn and Kleinschmidt were asked to leave Windhoek after two years of work there; Wesleyan missionary Haddy, stationed at Jonker's place between 1844 and 1850, visited the Cape for more than two years (1846–7) and, upon returning, found himself alone in Windhoek for months at a time; see Lau, , Hahn Tagebücher, II, 458; III, 584.Google Scholar

55 This has been demonstrated convincingly by Loth, Christliche Mission. For Hahn's vehemently anti-Afrikaner statements over the years, consult Lau, Hahn Tagebücher, \, subject index.

56 See e.g. ELC Konferenzprotokolle, 1845, and ibid., appendix; CA, G/H 19/10, Chapman memo, 1865.

57 Andersson, C. J., Lake Ngami (London, 1856), 37.Google Scholar

58 CA G/H 19/10, Chapman memo, 1865.

59 The selling price for ivory at the Cape in the early 1860s was around 6s. i pound; WA, Andersson Papers, III, Green's journal, n.d.

60 Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 262 (table b).Google Scholar

61 WA, Andersson Papers, III, Andersson to Searle, 4 March 1857.

62 BRMG, 1866, p. 291.Google Scholar

63 WA, Andersson Papers, II, 15 Aug. 1851; Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 260 (table a).Google Scholar

64 Ibid., 280–285.

65 Gallon, , Narrative, 70–71Google Scholar; Lau, , Hahn Tagebücher, II, 311Google Scholar; BRMG, 1856, p. 109Google Scholar; Lau, Cf., ‘Kommando polities’, 286–288.Google Scholar

66 ‘Quellen’, 3, 6 June 1854.

67 Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, ch. 7, esp. 237–247.Google Scholar

68 WA, Andersson Papers, in, 31 March 1860.

69 Lau, , Hahn Tagebücher, 1, 228, 245Google Scholar; BRMG, 1853, p. 247; 1854, p. 236; 1885, pp. 92, 200Google Scholar; ‘Quellen’, 5, 23 Nov. 1854Google Scholar; BRMG, 1857, p. 85; 1863, p. 79; 1864, pp. 195, 246, 330.Google Scholar

70 BRMG, 1862, p. 45Google Scholar; WA, Andersson Papers, IV, 15 May 1862.

71 Ibid., III, 10 and 18 April 1860; ‘Quellen’, 3, 30 Aug. 1862Google Scholar; BRMG, 1861, p. 312.Google Scholar

72 Andersson, C. J., Notes on Travel in South Africa (London, 1875), 15–20Google Scholar; Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 311–315Google Scholar; WA, Andersson Papers, IV, 3 and 4 April 1862.

73 CA, G/H 19/10, Chapman memo, 1865; BRMG, 1863, pp. 346–347.Google Scholar

74 Lau, ,‘Kommando polities’, 320–324Google Scholar; WA, Andersson Papers, 1, 31 Oct., 12Nov. 1864.

75 Ibid., 21 Jan. 1865.

76 Lau, ‘Kommando polities’, ch. 9.

77 BRMG, 1869, p. 260.Google Scholar

78 Goldblatt, , History of South West Africa, 44–46Google Scholar; Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 344–346.Google Scholar

79 WA, Andersson Papers, VI, 7 June 1866; Lau, , ‘Kommando polities’, 293–328.Google Scholar

80 Ibid., ‘Conclusion’.

81 Ibid., 221–231. For evidence of the failure of Neu-Barmen and Otjimbingwe as Christian centres up to the 1870s, see ibid., 298–299, and F. R. Lehmann, ‘Jonker Afrikaner und die Herero-Missionäre seiner Zeit als “Häuptlinge wider Willen” (1844–61), Südwestafrika’, Veröffentlichungend Museumsfur Völkerkundezu Leipzig (Leipzig, 1961), 410–431.Google Scholar