Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-76ns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:38:58.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Missionary Imperialism—The Case of Bechuanaland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Anthony J. Dachs
Anthony J. Dachs
Affiliation:
University of Rhodesia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article, based on private papers as well as missionary and government records, examines the development of missionary contact with the Tswana peoples from the first settlement at Dithakong in 1816 to the establishment of a formal British Protectorate. The author seeks to analyse the nature of ‘missionary imperialism’ as a consequence not only of missionary motives and methods—still less as the accidental interest of individual missionaries—but also as the product of practical missionary experience and frustration in African circumstances.

The absence of European administration from Bechuanaland for much of the nineteenth century gives a rare opportunity to study the effects of missionary activity on African life and polity, less complicated than usual by secular pressures and influences. And the lack of economic attraction in Bechuanaland allows a close examination of the incentives to empire. But it is likely that the trend apparent in missionary attitudes and work in Bechuanaland will be repeated in other areas, as for example in Ndebeleland and Malawi.

The missionary role in Bechuanaland was largely determined by the organization and attitudes of Tswana society; missionary methods had to be adjusted accordingly, and eventually included an appeal to the British government to intervene and reduce resistant Tswana authority. This was in the logic of the missionaries' experience. In this light of missionary history, a new importance is found for the agitation on the British government from 1882 and the definition of the Convention of London in 1884.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1972 , pp. 647 - 658
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Oliver, R., The Missionary Factor in East Africa (London, 1952).Google Scholar

2 Ajayi, J. F. Ade, Christian Missions in Nigeria, 1841–1891 (London, 1965);Google ScholarRotberg, Robert I., Christian Missions and the Creation of Northern Rhodesia, 1880–1924 (Princeton, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Sillery, A., John Mackenzie of Bechuanaland, 1835–1899 (Cape Town, 1971).Google Scholar Despite its subtitle, however, Mackenzie as an imperialist fails to emerge from Dr. Sillery's work, which is more useful for its description of British action in Bechuanaland than for its analysis of ‘humanitarian imperialism’. See my review in African Studies, 31 (4), 1972.

4 Journals of Read, Lattakoo, January 1817, L.M.S. Journals, S. Afr., 3/61 and 64.Google Scholar

5 Campbell, J., Travels in South Africa (London, 1815), 288.Google Scholar

6 Journal of Read, Lattakoo, 1 Jan. 1817, L.M.S. Journals, S. Afr., 3/65.Google Scholar

7 Journal of Hamilton, 1 Feb. 1816, L.M.S. Journals, S. Afr., 2/55.Google Scholar

8 Oliver, Missionary Factor, 65.Google Scholar

9 Mackenzie to Mullens, Kuruman, 25 Feb. 1878, L.M.S. S. Afr., 39/3/A.Google Scholar

10 For evidence to support these and other general statements, see my unpublished Ph.D. thesis, ‘Missionary Imperialism in Bechuanaland, 1813–1896’, University of Cambridge, 1968.Google Scholar

11 Livingstone to Freeman, Kolobeng, 9 Jan. 1850, L.M.S. Livingstone Letters 49.Google Scholar

12 See Dachs, Anthony J., ‘The Road to the North—the Origin and Force of a Slogan’, Central Africa Historical Association, 23, 1969.Google Scholar

13 Livingstone to Pakington, Kuruman, 12 Dec. 1852, Parl. Pap., 1646/13.Google Scholar

14 Mackenzie to Mullens, On the way to Kuruman from Shoshong, Aug. 1876, L.M.S. S. Afr., 38/3/C.Google Scholar

15 Mackenzie to Thompson, Shoshong, 29 Mar. 1868, University of Witwatersrand, Mackenzie Papers. In association with Professor N. G. Garson of the University of the Witwatersrand, I am preparing these papers for publication.Google Scholar

16 Mackenzie to Thomas and Sykes, Shoshong, April 1868, Wits. Mackenzie Papers.Google Scholar

17 Mackenzie, J., Austral Africa: Losing It or Ruling It (London, 1887), 1, 79.Google Scholar

18 Mackenzie, Austral Africa, 1, 77.Google Scholar

19 Mackenzie, Austral Africa, 1, 76.Google Scholar

20 Orpen to Lanyon, Kiniberley, 9 July 1878, Parl. Pap., C2222/36.Google Scholar

21 Mackenzie, J., ‘The Disturbances in Bechuanaland’, Cape Argus, 15 Aug. 1878.Google Scholar

22 Mackenzie to Lanyon, Kuruman, 10 July 1878, C.O.879/14/162/159.Google Scholar

23 Mackenzie to Mullens, Kuruman, 1 June 1878, L.M.S. S. Afr., 39/3/B.Google Scholar

24 Wookey to Mullens, Kuruman, 1 Aug. 1878 and 3 Sept. 1878, L.M.S. S. Afr., 39/3/C.Google Scholar

25 Mackenzie to Whitehouse, Kuruman, 3 June 1879, L.M.S. S. Afr., 40/1/C.Google Scholar

26 Mackenzie to Warren, n.d., Wits. Mackenzie Papers.Google Scholar

27 Warren to Lanyon, Taung, 19 Sept. 1878, Parl. Pap., Cz454/5.Google Scholar

28 Mackenzie to C.O., London, 4 Dec. 1883, Parl. Pap., C3841/104.Google Scholar

29 Mackenzie to Lanyon, Kuruman, 1 Aug. 1878, C.O.879/14/162/159.Google Scholar

30 Warren to Frere, Taung, 25 Sept. 1878, Parl. Pap., C2252/41.Google Scholar

31 Minute, C.O., Herbert, 1 Sept. 1878, C.O.48/485/10688.Google Scholar

32 Mackenzie to Thompson, Cape Town, 27 June 1882, L.M.S. S. Afr., 41/3/C.Google Scholar

33 Mackenzie to Thompson, Portobello, Nov. 1890, Wits. Mackenzie Papers.Google Scholar

34 Numerous such resolutions, passed during October and November z88z, appear in Parl. Pap., C3419.Google Scholar

35 Mackenzie to Chesson, Portobello, 1 Nov. 1882, Rhodes House, A.P.S. Papers, C141/180.Google Scholar

36 Chronicle of the London Missionary Society, June 1883, 205–16.Google Scholar

37 Forster, W. E. at Westminster Palace Hotel, 9 Oct. 1884, in The Times, 10 Oct. 1884.Google Scholar

38 Mackenzie to Dale, and Mackenzie to Stead, Portobello, Sept. 1883, Wits. Mackenzie Papers.Google Scholar

39 John, Mackenzie, ‘England and the Transvaal’, Pall Mall Gazette, 7 11 1883.Google Scholar

40 Schreuder, D. M., Gladstone and Kruger (London, 1969), 363–435.Google Scholar

41 Scanlen to Herbert, Private, London, 9 Jan. 1884, C.O.291/26/652; Daily News, 11 Jan. 1884.Google Scholar

42 Resolution of a Meeting at the House, Mansion, 27 Nov. 1883, C.O.291/25/20392; The Times, 28 Nov. 1883.Google Scholar

43 Derby to Transvaal Deputation, 29 Nov. 1883, Parl. Pap., C3947/9.Google Scholar

44 Derby to Gladstone, 8 Dec. 1883, cited in Schreuder, Gladstone and Kruger, 404.Google Scholar

45 Gladstone to Derby, 9 Dec. 1883, cited in idem.

46 Derby to Transvaal Deputation, 11 Dec. 1883, Parl. Pap., C3947/13.Google Scholar

47 Derby to Smyth, 27 Feb. 1884, Parl. Pap., C4036/20.Google Scholar

48 Minute, C.O., Herbert, 9 Feb. 1884, C.O.291/26/2244.Google Scholar

49 Mackenzie, , Austral Africa, II, 254 and 267.Google Scholar

50 Minute, C.O., Fairfield, 2 Nov. 1895, C.O.417/160/18993.Google Scholar

51 Centenary Report of the London Missionary Society, 1895, 2.Google Scholar

52 Robinson, R. and Gallagher, J., Africa and the Victorians, The Official Mind of Imperialism (London, 1961), 21.Google Scholar