Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:31:07.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Neither Ākhūnd nor Fukulī”: Munāzirah and the Discourse of Iranian Modernity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Hamid Rezaeiyazdi
Hamid Rezaeiyazdi*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Iranian modernity has chiefly been examined in the context of a dialectical antagonism between “traditionalists” and “modernists”—the main categories comprised of related sub-headings such as “Islamist” versus “secular,” “reactionary” versus “revolutionary,” and “regressive” versus “progressive.” Following this binaristic approach, Iranian adaptations of modernity have often been (de)historicized as a theatre of national “awakening” resulting from the toils of secular intellectuals in overcoming the obstinate resistance of traditional reactionaries, a confrontation between two purportedly well-defined and mutually exclusive camps. Such reductionist dialectics has generally overwritten the dialogic narrative of Iranian modernity, a conflicted dialogue misrepresented as a conflicting dialectic. It has also silenced an important feature of Iranian modernity: the universally acknowledged premise of the simultaneity and commensurability of tradition with modernity. The monāzereh (disputation or debate) is the account of the interaction between rival discourses that engaged in opposing, informing, and appropriating each other in the process of adapting modernity. Narrativizing the history of Iranian modernity as the conflict between mutually exclusive binaries overlooks its hyphenated, liminal identity—a narrative of adaptation rather than wholesale adoption, of heterogeneity rather than homogeneity, of dialogics rather than dialectics. The monāzereh is the account of modern Iranian histories.

Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 5: Special Issue: Dedicated to Homa Katouzian , September 2016 , pp. 855 - 885
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society For Iranian Studies 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this article entitled “The Dialogical Tradition of Iranian Modernity: Monazereh, Simultaneity, and the Making of Modern Iran” was published in Iranian Studies 49, no. 3 (May 2016):327–57.

References

Abazari, Alireza. “Sih Risālah-i Naqd-i Sūfīyyah az Dawrān-i Qājār” [Three treatises on the denunciation of Sufism from the Qājār era]. Payam-i Baharestan 2, no. 15 (1391/2012): 33–107.Google Scholar
Abrahamian, Ervand. Iran between Two Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Adamiyat, Fereydun. Fikr-i Āzādī va Muqaddamah-yi Nihzat-i Mashrūtiyat [The thought of freedom and the beginnings of the Constitutional Movement]. Tehran: Sukhan, 1340/1961.Google Scholar
Afary, Janet. The Iranian Constitutional Revolution, 1906–1911: Grassroots Democracy, Social Democracy, and the Origins of Feminism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Algar, Hamid. Mīrzā Malkum Khān: A Biographical Study in Iranian Modernism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. Translated and edited by Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Bamdad, Mahdī. Sharh-i Rijāl-i Īrān dar Qarn-i 12, 13, va 14 [History of Iranian dignitaries in the 12th, 13th, and 14th centuries]. 6 vols. Tehran: Zavvar, 1347/1968.Google Scholar
Bayat, Mangol. “The Rowshanfekr in the Constitutional Period: An Overview.” In Iran’s Constitutional Revolution: Popular Politics, Cultural Transformations and Transnational Connections edited by Chehabi, H. E. and Martin, Vanessa, 165–192. London: I. B. Tauris in association with Iran Heritage Foundation, 2010.Google Scholar
Behzadi, Muhammad Reza. “Pāyān Nāmah-i Duktur Tuluzān Hakīm Bāshī-yi Nāsir al-Dīn Shāh” [Nāser al-Dīn Shah’s royal physician Doctor Tholozan’s dissertation]. Payam-i Baharistan 2, no. 6 (1388/2010): 1121–1136.Google Scholar
Browne, Edward G. The Persian Revolution of 1905–1909. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Chehabi, H. E. and Vanessa, Martin eds. Iran’s Constitutional Revolution: Popular Politics, Cultural Transformations and Transnational Connections. London: I. B. Tauris, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curzon, George N. Persia and the Persian Question. London: Longmans, Green, 1892.Google Scholar
Ebrahimnejad, Hormoz, “Religion and Medicine in Qājār Iran.” In Religion and Society in Qājār Iran, edited by Gleave, Robert, 401–428. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2005.Google Scholar
Floor, W. M. “The Lūtīs—A Social Phenomenon in Qājār Persia: A Reappraisal.” Die Welt des Islams, new series 13, no. 1/2 (1971): 103–120. doi: 10.2307/1570405Google Scholar
Hidayat, Mahdi Quli. Khātirāt va Khatarāt [Memoirs and menaces]. Tehran: Zavvar, 1389/2010.Google Scholar
I’timad al-Saltanah, Muhammad Hasan. Rūznāmah-i Khātirāt-i I’timad al-Saltanah [The journal of I’timād al-Saltanah’s memoirs]. Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1389/2010.Google Scholar
Kasravi, Ahmad. Tārīkh-i Mashrūtah-yi Īrān [History of the Iranian constitutionalism]. Tehran: Seda-yi Mu‘asir, 1380/2001.Google Scholar
Keddie, Nikki R. Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kirmani, Nazem al-Islam. Tārīkh-i Bīdārī-yi Īrānīān [The history of the awakening of Iranians]. 4 vols. Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1363/1984.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Translated by Tribe, Keith. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Malikzadah, Mahdi. Tārīkh-i Inqilāb-i Mashrūtīyat-i Īrān [The history of the Iranian Constitutional Revolution]. 3 vols. Tehran: ‘Ilmi, 1371/1992.Google Scholar
Melville, Charles, ed. Persian Historiography: A History of Persian Literature. London: I. B. Tauris, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Vanessa. Iran between Islamic Nationalism and Secularism: The Constitutional Revolution of 1906. London: I. B. Tauris, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostowfi, ‘Abdullah. Sharh-i Zindagānī-yi Man: Tārīkh-i Ijtimā‘ī va Idārī-yi Dawrah-i Qājārīyah [An account of my life or the social and administrative history of the Qājār era). 3 vols. Tehran: Zavvar, 1384/2005.Google Scholar
Najmi, Nasir. Tehrān-i ‘Ahd-i Nāserī [Tehran during Nāser [al-Dīn Shah’s] times]. Tehran: Attar, 1364/1985.Google Scholar
Natiq, Homa, and Adamiyat, Fereydun, eds. Afkār-i Ijtimā‘ī va Sīyāsī va Iqtisādī dar Āsār-i Muntashir Nashudah-i Dawrān-i Qājār [Political, social, and economic thought in the unpublished works of the Qājār era). Tehran: Agah, 1356/1977.Google Scholar
Noruz Moradi, Kurosh. “Majlis-i Shurāy-i Dowlatī (Dār ul-Shurāy-i Kubrā) dar Sih Pārah Yād Dāsht” [The state senate (supreme consultative assembly) in three diaries]. Payam-i Baharestan 2, no. 7 (1389/2010): 969–977.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon, ed. Forms of Knowledge in Early Modern Asia: Explorations in the Intellectual History of India and Tibet, 1500–1800. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Rajabi, Muhammad Hasan, and Ruya Pouromid, Fatemeh, eds. Maktūbāt va Bayānāt-i Sīyāsī va Ijtimā‘ī-yi ‘Ulamā-yi Shī‘ah: 1200–1323 [The political and social correspondences and speeches of Shiite clergy: 1786–1905). Vol. 1. Tehran: Nashr-i Nay, 1384/2005.Google Scholar
Rezvani, Mohamad Esma‘il. “Bīst u du rasālah-i tablīghātī az dowrah-i inqilāb-i mashrūtīyyat” [22 propagandist treatises from the Constitutional era]. Rahnama-yi Ketab 12, no. 5–6 (1348/1969): 229–240.Google Scholar
Ridgeon, Lloyd. Morals and Mysticism: A History of Sufi-futuwwat in Iran. New York: Routledge, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeon, Lloyd. “Kasravi, Ahmad vi. On Mysticism and Sufi Persian Poetry.” Encyclopedia Iranica Online, s.v. Accessed July 17, 2014. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/kasravi-ahmad-viGoogle Scholar
Ringer, Monica M. Education, Religion, and the Discourse of Cultural Reform in Qājār Iran. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
Seyed-Ghorab, A. A., and McGlinn, S., trans. The Essence of Modernity: Mīrzā Yusof Khān Mustashar ad-Dowla Tabrizi’s Treatise on Codified Law (Yak Kaleme). Amsterdam & West Lafayette, Indiana: Rozenberg Publishers & Purdue University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Talebof, ‘Abdolrahim: Kitāb-i Ahmad [The book of Ahmad]. 2nd ed. Edited by Momeni, Bagher. Tehran: Farus, Summer 2536/1977.Google Scholar
Tavakoli-Targhi, Muhammad. “Early Persianate Modernity.” In Forms of Knowledge in Early Modern Asia: Explorations in the Intellectual History of India and Tibet, 1500–1800, edited by Pollock, Sheldon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Tavakoli-Targhi, Muhammad. “From Patriotism to Matriotism: A Tropological Study of Iranian Nationalism, 1870–1909.” Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 34 (2002): 217–238.Google Scholar
Tavakoli-Targhi, Muhammad. “Tajaddud-i Rūzmarrah va ‘Āmpūl-i Tadayyun’” [Quotidian modernity and the “injection of religiosity”]. Iran Nāmah 24, no. 4 (1387/2009): 41–76.Google Scholar
Zargarinejad, Gholam Hosein, and Amir Ahmadzādah, Muhammad. “Taqābul-i Sitārah Shināsī-yi Sunnatī va Mudirn dar Jarīyān-i Tarjumah-i ‘Ulūm-i jadīd (Dawrah-i Nāser al-Dīn Shah Qājār)” [The opposition between traditional and modern astronomy in the process of the translation of the new sciences (Nāser al-Dīn Shah Qājār era)]. Iran History 66, no. 5 (2010): 49–69.Google Scholar