Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T07:14:29.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marking Boundaries, Marking Time: The Iranian Past and the Construction of the Self by Qajar Thinkers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Juan R. I. Cole*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Michigan

Extract

The intellectual model of european nationalism had a powerful impact in the second half the nineteenth century upon Qajar intellectuals and officials, many of whom lived abroad, were fluent in some European language, or were influenced by translations of European works. These thinkers, beginning in the 1850s, were the first to attempt to “imagine” an Iranian nation. That they made this attempt is a result not only of the influence upon them of the modular nationalist experience, but also of their own encounter with the same forces of modernity that were hammering Europe itself—new media of communication, new forms of transportation, and processes of economic differentiation deriving from the rise of core industrial economies and vastly increased world trade—all of which afforded states and other institutions the resources for disciplinary technologies that reshaped the Self.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities, 2nd ed. (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

2. Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Pantheon, 1977)Google Scholar; cf. Rejali, Darius M., Torture and Modernity in Iran: Self, Society and the State in Modern Iran (Boulder: Westview Press, 1994)Google Scholar. Vaziri, Mostafa, Iran as Imagined Nation: The Construction of National Identity (New York: Paragon House, 1993)Google Scholar, argues persuasively for the constructed character of modern Iranian nationalism, but, it seems to me, overemphasizes the role of European scholars in this endeavor at the expense of Qajar and Pahlavi thinkers themselves.

3. Scheff, Thomas, “A Theory of Ethnic Nationalism,” in Calhoun, Craig, ed., Social Theory and the Politics of Identity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994), 284Google Scholar.

4. Derrida, Jacques, The Other Heading: Reflections on Today's Europe (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992)Google Scholar; see for discussion Allen, Glenn Scott, “Baptismal Eulogies: Reconstructing Deconstruction from the Ashes,” Postmodern Culture 3, no. 2 (January 1993)Google Scholar; and for a kindred analysis, Pieterse, Jan Nederveen, “Image and Power,” in Corbey, R. and Leerssen, J. Th., eds., Alterity, Identity, Image: Selves and Others in Society and Scholarship (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1991), 191–203Google Scholar.

5. Scheff, “Theory of Ethnic Nationalism,” 287.

6. Ibid., 294.

7. Taussig, Michael, Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses (London: Routledge, 1993), 19Google Scholar.

8. Hobsbawm, Eric J., Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Gellner, Ernest, Nations and Nationalism (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; idem., Encounters with Nationalism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994); Guha, Ranajit, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Chatterjee, Partha, The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

9. Kia, Mehrdad, “Mirza Fath Ali Akhundzade and the Call for Modernization in the Islamic World,” Middle Eastern Studies 31 (July 1995): 422–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sanjabi, Maryam, “Rereading the Enlightenment: Akhundzada and his Voltaire,” Iranian Studies 28, nos. 1–2 (Winter/Spring 1995): 39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Saniyah-'i Akhundzadeh/Ruznamah-'i, Millat-i Iran, 16 May 1866, translated in Parsinejad, Iraj, Mirza Fath ‘AH Akhundzadeh: A Literary Critic (Piedmont, Calif.: Jahan Book Co., 1990), 19Google Scholar.

11. Chatterjee, The Nation and its Fragments, 76–115, esp. 110.

12. Akhundzadah, Mirza Fath ‘Ali, Maktūbāt, ed. Subhdam, M. (Germany: Intisharat-i Mard-i Imruz, 1985), 1516Google Scholar

13. Ibid., 16–20.

14. Kia, “Mirza Fath Ali Akhundzade,” 434.

15. Akhundzadah, Maktūbāt, 24, n.

16. Ibid., 33.

17. Akhundzadeh/Ruznamih-'i Millat-i Saniyih-'i Iran, 16 May 1866, in Parsinejad, Literary Critic, 34.

18. Akhundzadah, Maktūbāt, 158–61.

19. Ibid., 162, n.

20. Akhundzadah, Fath ‘Ali, Alifbā-yi jadīd va maktūbāt, ed. Muhammadzadah, Hamid and Arasali, Hamid (Baku: Nashriyyat-i Farhangistan-i ‘Ulum-i Azarbaijan SSR, 1963), 336Google Scholar.

21. Cf. Kia, “Mirza Fath Ali Akhundzade,” 444.

22. Akhundzadah, Maktūbāt, 31.

23. See Najmabadi, Afsaneh, Zanhā-yi millat: Women, or Wives of the Nation,” Iranian Studies 26, nos. 1–4 (Winter/Spring 1993): 5171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Taussig, Mimesis and Alterity, 13.

25. al-Mulk, Majd, Risālah-yi Majdiyyah, repr. in Amini, ‘Ali, Bīst sāl ba'd az Amīr-i Kabīr (Tehran: n.p., 1985), 92Google Scholar.

26. al-Baha, ‘Abd, Risālah-yi madaniyyah (Hofheim-Langenhain: Baha'i-Verlag, 1984), 7Google Scholar; trans. Gail, Marzieh as The Secret of Divine Civilization (Wilmette, 111.: Baha'i Publishing Trust, 1970), 5Google Scholar.

27. Risālah, 9–13; trans. Secret, 7–10.

28. Risālah, 33–38; trans. Secret, 25–32.

29. Risālah, 55–63; trans. Secret, 46–51.

30. Risālah, 80–81; trans. Secret, 68.

31. Risālah, 104–108; trans. Secret, 87–91.

32. al-Baha, ‘Abd, A Traveller's Narrative Written to Illustrate the Episode of the Bab (Maqālah-yi shakhṣī sayyāh), trans, and ed. Browne, E. G., 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1891), 1:197–98Google Scholar; 2:160–61.

33. Ibid., 1:199; 2:161.

34. Ibid., 1:199–200; 2:161–62.

35. al-Saltanah, Muhammad Hasan Khan I'timad, Khalsah mashhūr bih khwābnāmah, ed. Katira'i, Mahmud (Tehran: Tahuri, 1970)Google Scholar, editor's Introduction, v-vii; and Bakhash, Shaul, Iran: Monarchy, Bureaucracy and Reform under the Qajars, 1858–1896 (London: Ithaca Press, 1978), 378Google Scholar, 405–414, and passim.

36. I'timad al-Saltanah, Khalsah, 27

37. Alavi, Bozorg, “Critical Writings on the Renewal of Iran,” in Bosworth, Edmund and Hillenbrand, Carole, eds., Qajar Iran (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1983), 246Google Scholar.

38. I'timad al-Saltanah, Khalsah, 24.

39. Bakhash, Iran, 316–17, 410.

40. I'timad al-Saltanah, Rūznāmah-yi khāṭirāt, quoted in ibid., 185.

41. Ibid., 262, 267.

42. Ibid.

43. Alavi, “Critical Writings,” 248.

44. I'timad al-Saltanah, Khalsah, 1.

45. Ibid., 2–8.

46. Ibid., 9, 16.

47. Ibid., 17–18.

48. Ibid., 19–21.

49. Ibid., 25.

50. Ibid., 27–28.

51. Ibid., 30–31.

52. Ibid., 32–36.

53. Ibid., 38–41.

54. Ibid., 45–48, quote on p. 48.

55. This interpretation of the latter part of the book is informed by the discussion of Alavi, “Critical Writings,” 247.

56. Chatterjee, The Nation and its Fragments, 115; see also Derrida, The Heading of the Other.