Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T15:29:41.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Court of Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

Effect of Awards of Compensation Made by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal: On December 9, 1953, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution requesting the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on the following questions: 1) has the General Assembly the right to refuse to give effect to an award of compensation made by the Administrative Tribunal in favor of a United Nations staff member whose contract of service had been terminated without his assent? and 2) if the Court's answer to the first question was in the affirmative, what were the principal grounds on which the Assembly could lawfully exercise such a right? After copies of this resolution were transmitted to the Court by a letter of the Secretary-General (Hammarskjold) dated December 16, the Court fixed March 15, 1954, as the time-limit within which written statements might be submitted by any state entitled to appear before it or any international organization considered by the president as likely to be able to furnish information on these questions, and reserved the rest of the procedure for further decision. Members of the United Nations and the International Labor Organization were then notified that, in accordance with Article 66 (2) of the Statute, the president considered them likely to be able to furnish such information.

Type
International Organizations: Summary of Activities: I. United Nations
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Effect of awards of compensation made by the U.N. Administrative Tribunal, Order of January 14th, 1954: I.C.J. Reports 1954, p. 4–5.

2 ICJ Communiqué 54/1.

3 For summary of the Court's judgment on the preliminary objection of Guatemala, see Intemational Organization, VIII, p. 128–129.

4 Nottebohm case, Order of January 15th, 1954: I.C.J. Reports 1954, p. 7.

5 For summary of the application of the Italian government to the Court instituting proceedings against France, the United Kingdom and the United States in this case, see International Organization, VII, p. 406; for subsequent action, see Ibid., VIII, p. 129.

6 Case of the monetary gold removed from Rome in 1943, Order of January 26th, 1954: I.C.J. Reports 1954, p. 10.

7 ICJ Communiqué 54/2.

8 Ibid.