Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:42:51.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Court of Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

Following the decisions of the International Court of Justice on November 20 and 27, 1950 on the question of asylum for the refugee, Victor Raul Haya de la Torre, the government of Colombia (on December 13, 1950) instituted new proceedings before the Court against the government of Peru. The applicationof Colombia requested the Court to adjudge and declare, in pursuance of Article 7 of the Protocol of Friendship and Cooperation of 1934 in force between Colombia and Peru, the manner in which effect should be given to the Court's judgment of November 20, 1950, and in particular whether Colombia was or was not bound to deliver Victor Raul Haya de la Torre, a refugee in the Colombian embassy at Lima, to the government of Peru. As an alternative claim, in the event that the principal claim was disallowed, Colombia requested the Court to declare in exercise of its ordinary competence whether, in accordance with the law in force between Colombia and Peru and particularly American international law, the government of Colombia was or was not bound to deliver Haya de la Torre to the government of Peru.

Type
International Organizations: Summary of Activities: I. United Nations
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See International Organization, V, p. 191–193.

2 Haya de la Torre case, Order of January 3, 1951: ICJ Reports 1951, p. 5.

3 Ibid.

4 Ibid., p. 6.

5 ICJ Communiqué 51/3, February 9, 1951.

6 See International Organization, IV, p. 123.

7 Anglo-Norwegian fisheries case, Order of March 29, 1950: ICJ Reports 1950, p. 63.

8 Ibid, Order of October 4, 1950: ICJ Reports 1950, p. 264.

9 Ibid., p. 263.

10 Ibid., Order of January 10, 1951: ICJ Reports 1951, p. 9.