Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T17:10:43.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sanctions for Political Change—The Indonesian Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Whitney T. Perkins
Get access

Extract

In the Indonesian case, involving contention before the Security Council between Asian nationalism and a western democracy, the UN was a significant influence in a process of political change. The Netherlands, having resorted with apparent success to the use of force, finally agreed to withdraw from Indonesia. Despite the fighting, this case illustrates the perennial problem of peaceful change—how is legitimacy transferred? What non-military pressures and inducements are required to bring about the renunciation of a position which is legally and militarily defensible?

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Winter 1958 , pp. 26 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Handelingen, Statin Generaal, Tweede Kamer, 1939–40. p. 1206.

2 Colijn, H., Keloniale Vraagstukken van Heden en Morten, Amsterdam, 1929, p. 53 ff. Translations from Dutch have been made by the authorGoogle Scholar.

3 Ibid., p. 39.

4 Handelingen, Tweede Kamer, 1939–40, p. 1155, 1159.

5 DrMook, H. J. van, Indonesie, Nederland en de Wereld, Amsterdam, 1949, p. 36 ffGoogle Scholar.

6 Gerbrandy, P. S., Indonesia, London, 1950, p. 59 ffGoogle Scholar.

7 Holborn, Louise W., ed., War and Place Aims of the United Nations, I, Boston, 1943, p. 522Google Scholar.

8 De Staw, I, No. 1, 03 15, 1930, p. 1 ffGoogle Scholar; No. 4, May 1, 1930, p. 2.

9 Vrij Nederland, VI, 10 6, 1945, p. 349Google Scholar.

10 Mook, Van, op. cit., p. 96 ffGoogle Scholar.

11 Handelingen, Tweede Kamer, 1943–46, p. 149, 293.

12 Helsdingen, W. H. van, Op Wig naar eeb Nederlandscb-lndonesiscbe Unie. Stemmin van bier in ginds, The Hague, 1947, p. IIIGoogle Scholar.

13 Mook, Van, op. cit., p. 131Google Scholar. It is believed by some of those who were more directly responsible for the decision that van Mook withheld information on the attitude of Sjahrir which, if known, might have led to the continuance of negotiations.

14 Kahin, George McTurnan, Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia, Ithaca, New York, 1952, p. 209 and nGoogle Scholar.

15 Helsdingen, Van, op. cit., p. 444Google Scholar.

16 Handelingen, Tweede Kamer, 1946–47, p. 427.

17 Mook, Van, op. cit., p. 165 ffGoogle Scholar.

18 Nieuwe Rotterdamse Courant, December 31, 1948.

19 A comparable expeditionary force for the United States would have numbered more than 1,500,000.

20 deKadt, J., De Indonesiscbe Tragedie, Amsterdam, 1949, p. 146Google Scholar.

21 Socialisme en Democratic, January 1949, p. 3.

22 Handelingen, Tweede Kamer, 1946–47, p. 2086, 2093, 2106.

23 Ibid., p. 2134.

24 Mook, Van, op. cit., p. 186Google Scholar.

25 Gerretson, C., Nieuwe Eeuw, 12 6, 1947Google Scholar; Romme, C. P. M., Volkskrant, 12 10, 1947Google Scholar; Joekes, A. M., Socialisme en Democratie, 10 1947Google Scholar; deKadt, , op. cit., p. 149Google Scholar; Mook, van, op. cit., p. 187Google Scholar.

26 Handelingen, Tweede Kamer, 1947–48, p. 14; Security Council, Official Records (2d year), No. 77, 185th meeting, 08 15, 1947, p. 2011Google Scholar.

27 Handelingan, Tweedt kamer, 1947–48, p. 68 ff, 71 ff.

28 Mook, Van, op. cit., p. 190Google Scholar.

29 Handelingen, Tweede Kamer, 1947–48, p. 70 ff.

30 Security Council Official Records (2d year), No. 82, 192d meeting, 08 22, 1947, p. 2146 ffGoogle Scholar.

31 Mook, Van, op. cit., p. 193, 195 ffGoogle Scholar; Nieuwe Rotterdamse Courant, December 24, 1948.

32 Text of the Renville Agreement in Wolf, Charles Jr, The Indonesian Story, New York, 1948, p. 187Google Scholar.

33 Mook, Van, op. cit., p. 111Google Scholar.

34 Handelingen, Tweede Kamer1, 1947–48, p. 1099.

35 Security Council Official Records (3d year), Nos. 16–35, 109th to 138th meetings, 02 19–04 10, 1947 P. 317Google Scholar: No. 82, 192d to 193d meetings, August 22. 1947.

36 Stempels, A., De Parhmentaire Geschiedenis van bet Indonesische Vraagstuk, Amsterdam, 1930, p. 141Google Scholar.

37 Mook, Van, op. tit., p. 113Google Scholar.

38 Stempels, , op. cit., p. 148Google Scholar.

39 Mook, Van, op. cit., p. 219Google Scholar.

40 Kahin, , op. cit., p. 336Google Scholar.

41 Vos, H. and deKadt, J., Socialisme en Democratie, 01 1949, p. 14, 44Google Scholar.

42 Handelingen, 1948–49, p. 785.

43 Logemann, , Socialisme en Democratie, 01 1949Google Scholar; Mook, van, Nieuwe Rotterdamse Courant, 01 15, 1949Google Scholar.

44 Prime MinisterDrees, , Handelingen, Eerste Kamer, 1948–1949, p. 178Google Scholar; Tweede Kamer, p. 2278; Kabin, , op. cit., p. 391 ffGoogle Scholar.

45 Nieuwe Rotterdamse Courant, December 31, 1948.

46 Handelingen, 1948–49, Eerste Kamer, p. 176; Tweede Kamer, p. 1308.

47 Handelingen, 1948–49, Eerste Kilmer, p. 178.