Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7bb4899584-csk67 Total loading time: 0.52 Render date: 2023-01-26T23:28:25.082Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Grand strategy: the pursuit of power and the pursuit of plenty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review essay
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1985. Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics 38:226–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Richard K. 19931994. Wealth, power and instability: East Asia and the United States after the cold war. International Security 18(3): 3478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltuck, Richard, and Litan, Robert E.. 1991. Down in the dumps: Administration of the unfair trade laws. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1983. Tariff protection in developed and developing countries. International Organization 37:441–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1984. Public goods, prisoner's dilemmas, and the international political economy. International Studies Quarterly 28:522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1985. Trade wars: A comparative study of Anglo–House, Franco–Italian and Hawley–Smoot conflicts. World Politics 38:147–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1987. Trade wars: The theory and practice of international commercial rivalry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dietrich, William S. 1991. In the shadow of the rising sun: The political roots of American economic decline. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Encarnation, Dennis J. 1992. Rivals beyond trade: America versus Japan in global competition. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert, and Haggard, Stephan. 1992. The United States and the regionalization of the world economy. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey, Stein, Ernesto, and Wei, Shang-Ji. 1993. Continental trading blocs: Natural or supernatural? NBER working paper no. 4588, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey, Stein, Ernesto, and Wei, Shang-Ji. 1994. APEC and regional trading arrangements in the Pacific. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron. 1989. The strategic implications of relative economic decline. Political Science Quarterly 104:401–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron. 1991. The end of autonomy. Daedalus 120:6990.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry. 1988. Sectoral conflict and U.S. foreign economic policy, 1914–1940. International Organization 42:5990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, David. 1988. The misunderstood miracle: Industrial development and political change in Japan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Garten, Jeffrey E. 1992. A cold peace: America, Japan, Germany, and the struggle for supremacy. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert G. 1975. U.S. power and the multinational corporation. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert G.. 1981. War and change in the international system. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1994. Interests, ideas, and American foreign economic policy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1994. Allies, adversaries and international trade. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Edward M., and Ebert, Michael E.. 1991. Foreign direct investment and national security: Fixing the Exon–Florio process. The World Economy 14:245–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Edward M., and Krugman, Paul R.. 1991. Foreign direct investment in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google ScholarPubMed
Grieco, Joseph M. 1990. Cooperation among nations: Europe, America, and non-tariff barriers to trade. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 1994. The United States and regionalism in Asia and the Americas. In Asia-Pacific and the Americas: Reconciling regional and global economic interests. La Jolla, Calif.: Institute of the Americas.Google Scholar
Hart, Jeffrey A. 1992. Rival capitalists: International competitiveness in the United States, Japan and Western Europe. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. [1945] 1980. National power and the structure of foreign trade. Reprint, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, Lake, David A., and Mastanduno, Michael. 1988. The state and American foreign economic policy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ito, Takatoshi, and Krueger, Anne O., eds. 1993. Trade and protectionism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen-Moran, Jeri. 1995. Regionalism and rules of origin: Implications for future negotiations. The Washington Quarterly 18(4).Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1985. European protectionism in theory and practice. World Politics 37:475502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles, with Frankel, J.. 1993. Regionalism and rivalry: Japan and the U.S. in Pacific Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Lawrence F., and Summers, Lawrence H.. 1989. Industrial rents: Evidence and implications. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1:209–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1980. The theory of hegemonic stability and changes in international economic regimes, 1967–1977. In Change in the international system, edited by Holsti, Ole, Siverson, Randolph, and George, Alexander. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The world in depression. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1986. Hierarchy versus inertial cooperation. International Organization 40:841–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klepper, Gernot. 1994. Industrial policy in the transport aircraft industry. In Empirical studies of strategic trade policy, edited by Krugman, Paul and Smith, Alasdair. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. 1992. Free trade agreements as protectionist devices: Rules of origin. NBER working paper no. 4352, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O.. 1995a. American trade policy: A tragedy in the making. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O.. 1995b. Political economy of trade protection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Anne O., and Krishna, Kala. 1995. Implementing free trade areas: Rules of origin and hidden protection. NBER working paper 4983, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1983. Targeted industrial policies: Theory and evidence. In Symposium: Industrial change and public policy. Kansas City, Mo.: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1986. Introduction. In Strategic trade policy and the new international economics. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1991. The age of diminished expectations. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1993. What do undergrads need to know about trade? The American Economic Review 83:2326.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1994a. Peddling prosperity. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1994b. Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs 73:2844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1994c. The fight over competitiveness: A zero-sum debate? Foreign Affairs 73:186203.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul, and Obstfeld, Maurice. 1994. International economics: Theory and policy. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul, and Baldwin, Robert E.. 1988. Industrial policy and international competition in wide-bodied jet aircraft. In Trade policy issues and empirical analysis, edited by Baldwin, R. E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1985. Economic statecraft. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A.. 1988. Power, protection, and free trade: International sources of U.S. commercial strategy, 1887–1939. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Robert Z., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 1993. International trade and American wages in the 1980s: Giant sucking sound or small hiccup? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 2:161226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipson, Charles. 1984. International cooperation in economic and security affairs. World Politics 37:123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. 1993. The endangered America dream: How to stop the United States from becoming a Third World country and how to win the geo-economic struggle for industrial supremacy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Magaziner, Ira C., and Reich, Robert B.. 1983. Minding America's business: The decline and rise of the American economy. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Magaziner, Ira C., and Patinkin, Mark. 1990. The silent war: Inside the global business battles shaping America's future. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. 1994. Power, trade, and war. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael. 1991. Do relative gains matter: America's response to Japanese industrial policy. International Security 16:79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Timothy. 1984. Firms and tariff regime change: Explaining the demand for protection. World Politics 36:214–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Timothy. 1991. A liberal trade order? The long-run pattern of imports to the advanced capitalist states. International Studies Quarterly 35:151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 1990. Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the cold war. International Security 15(1):557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting protectionism: Global industries and the politics of international trade. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., and Yoffie, David B.. 1989. Strategic trade policy and corporate trade demands. International Organization 43:239–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Theodore H. 1990. The globalization of America's defense industries: Managing the threat of foreign dependence. International Security 15:57100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Theodore H.. 1993. American economic policy and national security. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C. 1985. Competition and cooperation: The U.S. and Japanese commercial aircraft industries. California Management Review 27:7082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, David C.. 1987. Alliance politics and economics: International joint ventures in commercial aircraft. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C.. 1992. The McDonnell Douglas–Taiwan aerospace agreement: A modest expansion of the trend toward globalization in aerospace. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11:476–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mytelka, Lynn K. 1990. States, strategic alliances, and international oligopolies: The European ESPRIT program. In Strategic alliances in the world economy, edited by Mytelka, Lynn K.. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Mytelka, Lynn K., and Delapierre, M.. 1987. The alliance strategies of European firms in the information technology industry and the role of ESPRIT. Journal of Common Market Studies 16:231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Jr 1990. Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Odell, John. 1990. Understanding international trade policies: An emerging synthesis. World Politics 43:139–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orden, David. 1995. Agricultural interest groups and the North American Free Trade Agreement. In Political economy of trade protection, edited by Krueger, Anne. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth. 1992. Economic discrimination and political exchange: World political economy in the 1930s and 1980s. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pastor, Robert A. 1980. Congress and the politics of U.S. foreign economic policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Kevin P. 1984. Staying on top: The business case for a national industrial strategy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Pollins, Brian M. 1989a. Conflict, cooperation, and commerce: The effects of international political interactions on bilateral trade flows. American Journal of Political Science 33:737–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollins, Brian M.. 1989b. Does trade still follow the flag? American Political Science Review 83:465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prestowitz, Clyde V. Jr 1988. Trading places: How we allowed Japan to take the lead. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Richardson, David. 1989. Empirical research on trade liberalization with imperfect competition: A survey. OECD Economic Studies 12:87125.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and coalitions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36:379415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Richard J. 1994. Rich nation, strong army: National security, ideology, and the transformation of Japan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard J., and Friedman, David. 1993. How to succeed without really flying: The Japanese aircraft industry and Japan's technology ideology. In Regionalism and rivalry: Japan and the U.S. in Pacific Asia, edited by Frankel, J. and Kahler, M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne, Borrus, Michael, and Zysman, John. 1992. The highest stakes: The economic foundation of the next security system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlie, T. 1986. A competitive assessment of the U.S. aircraft industry. Boulder, Colo.: Westview for the U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Schott, Jeffrey J., and Buurman, Johanna V.. 1994. The Uruguay Round: An assessment. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Sharp, Margaret. 1986. Europe and the new technologies. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985a. Coordination versus prisoner's dilemma: Implications for international cooperation and regimes. American Political Science Review 79:923–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985b. The limitations of hegemonic stability theory. International Organization 39:579614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, T. N. 1987. The national defense argument for government intervention in foreign trade. In U.S. trade policies in a changing world economy, edited by Stern, Robert. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur A. 1984. The hegemon's dilemma: Great Britain, the United States, and the international economic order. International Organization 38:355–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1988. States and markets. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thurow, Lester C. 1992. Head to head: The coming economic battle among Japan, Europe, and America. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Tyson, Laura D'Andrea. 1992. Who's bashing whom: Trade conflict in high-technology industries. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1991. International trade: U.S. business access to certain foreign state-of-the-art technology. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ulph, David, and Winters, L. Alan. 1994. Strategic manpower policy and international trade. In Empirical studies of strategic trade policy, edited by Krugman, Paul and Smith, Alasdair. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1948. Power versus plenty as objectives of foreign policy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. World Politics 1:129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Grand strategy: the pursuit of power and the pursuit of plenty
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Grand strategy: the pursuit of power and the pursuit of plenty
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Grand strategy: the pursuit of power and the pursuit of plenty
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *