Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  4. Volume 1
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all volumes

Volume 1 - October 1985

Contents

Page 5 of 7

Technology Assessment

  • The Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American Collegeof Physicians

  • Linda Johnson White, John R. Ball
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 March 2009, pp. 169-174

  • Throughout the history of the development and use of medical technologies (phar-maceuticals, laboratory tests, invasive and noninvasive procedures, and medical devices), physicians and their patients have been the primary assessors of a technology's worth. If a drug, test, or procedure produces consistent beneficial effects, with little or no risk, then such a technology is commonly added to the clinician's arsenal of weapons against illness and disease. Academic researchers, however, with their keen desires to find new and better ways to diagnose, treat, and cure, are relied upon to produce evidence documenting a technology's efficacy. Others engaged in technology assessment activities—from their own perspectives—include manufacturers, who produce data showing the value of the products they hope to sell; hospitals that wish to make cost-effective purchases; and government agencies, with mandates to protect the public and to spend public dollars wisely. Still, it is the practicing physician who ultimately judges a technology's value based upon its use in individual clinical situations. Until very recently, with the apparent adequacy of these evaluative methods, medical professional societies were not required to enter the technology assessment arena.

Reviews

Technology Assessment Reports

Sorcerer's Apprentice

Reviews

Technology Assessment Reports

Technology Assessment

Sorcerer's Apprentice

Emerging Technology

Sorcerer's Apprentice

Emerging Technology

Contributors

World Perspectives

Contributors

Statistics

Front matter

  • THC volume 1 issue 4 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 March 2009, pp. f1-f7
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • THC volume 1 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 March 2009, pp. f1-f8
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Emerging Technology

Page 5 of 7