Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T20:49:17.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Power-based pulsed radar detection using wavelet denoising and spectral threshold with pattern analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2020

Ali Siblini*
Affiliation:
Department of GRIT, Doctoral School of Sciences and Technologies, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
Kassim Audi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Electronics, Faculty of Sciences 1, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
Alaa Ghaith
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Electronics, Faculty of Sciences 1, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
*
Author for correspondence: Ali Siblini, E-mail: ali.siblini.84@hotmail.com

Abstract

In this paper, an algorithm for extracting and localizing a radar pulse in a noisy environment is described. The algorithm combines two powerful tools: wavelet denoising and the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) analysis with statistical-based threshold. We aim to detect radar pulses transmitted by any radar in blind mode regardless of the intra-pulse modulation and parametric features. The use of the proposed technique makes the detection and localization of radar pulses possible under very low signal-to-noise ratio conditions (−18 dB), which leads to a reduction of the required signal power or alternatively extends the detection range of radar systems. Radar classes pattern-based analysis is used in blind mode to decrease the probability of false alarm.

Type
Radar
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wegener, WA (2011) IEEE STD 181-2011 (Revision of IEEE STD 181-2003) IEEE standard for transitions, pulses, and related waveforms. Sponsored by the Waveform Generation, Measurement, and Analysis Committee.Google Scholar
Paulter, NG Jr., Larson, DR and Blair, JJ (2004) The IEEE standard on transitions, pulses, and related waveforms, STD-181-2003. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aly, OAM, Omar, AS and Elsherbeni, AZ (2006) Detection and localization of RF radar pulses in noise environments using wavelet packet transform and higher order statistics. Progress in Electromagnetics Research 58, 301317.Google Scholar
Yu, D, Wang Jinzhen, SS and Zengping, C (2014) Detection of LFM signals in low SNR based on STFT and wavelet denoising. ICALIP-IEEE, 921925. doi: 10.1109/ICALIP.2014.7009929.Google Scholar
Joy, J, Peter, S and John, N (2013) Denoising using soft thresholding. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering 2, 10271032.Google Scholar
Yun, L and Jing-chao, L (2011) Radar signal recognition algorithms based on neural network and grey relation theory, 2011 Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science and Wireless Technology Conference, Harbin Engineering University Harbin, China, pp. 14821485.Google Scholar
Matuszewski, J (2012) The radar signature in a recognition system database, MIKON 2012, 19th International Conference on Microwaves, Radar and Wireless Communication, May 21–23, Poland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X, Huang, G, Zhou, Z, Tian, W, Yao, J and Gao, J (2018) Radar emitter recognition based on the energy cumulant of short time Fourier transform and reinforced deep belief network. Sensors 18, 3103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pachori, RB and Nishad, A (2016) Cross-Terms reduction in the Wigner–Ville distribution using tunable-Q wavelet transform. Signal Processing 120, 288304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar