Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T11:21:11.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Derailing State Immunity: A Broad-Brush Approach to Jurisdiction under Claims for the Expropriation of Cultural Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2019

Luke Tattersall*
Affiliation:
Barrister, Essex Court Chambers, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract:

The following article considers the approach taken by the courts of the United States in claims concerning issues of state immunity and private international law with respect to the expropriation and restitution of cultural property, primarily in the context of Nazi Germany. It can be seen that the US courts have interpreted the provisions under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act so as to significantly widen the scope for individuals to bring claims against states and state entities in circumstances where the case, and the property concerned, has little or no connection with the jurisdiction and which at their core are domestic disputes.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Brinkley, H. 2013. The History of the Monuments, Fine Arts and Archives Program (Scotts Valley, CA: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform, 2013).Google Scholar
Tams, C. J. 2005. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005).10.1017/CBO9780511494116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, C. M. 2005. “Altmann v. Austria and the Retroactivity of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 1: 207–23.10.1093/jicj/3.1.207CrossRefGoogle Scholar