Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T07:20:21.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the nomenclature of diffuse fragmentary objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

P. Polechova
P. Polechova*
Affiliation:
Observatory Petrin, Prague, Czechoslovakia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For the purpose of Cataloguing diffuse objects in a wide range of dimensions, two alternative proposals are presented.

Problems similar to those discussed in connection with the nomenclature of optical HII-regions may occur with any diffuse objects such as molecular clouds, large reflection nebulae, HI-regions, and, of course, radio HII-regions.

The radio HII-regions are most commonly designated by the galactic numbers “G”. The galactic longitude forms the first part of this number, the galactic latitude the second part, both parts being usually accurate to the first decimal digit and separated by the sign of latitude. This system (also used sometimes for optical objects) was introduced by Mezger and Henderson (1967) in a survey at 5 GHz, with a half power beam width of the telescope of about 6'. The angular dimensions of their objects were in the range from 3 to 11'.

Type
G. Editorial Policies and Nomenclature
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 64: Automated Data Retrieval in Astronomy , 1982 , pp. 207 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1982

References

Bok, B.J., Bester, M.J., Wade, CM.: Daedalus 86, 9 or Harvard reprint N° 416 (1955)Google Scholar
Gum, CS.: Memoirs Roy. Astron. Soc. 67,155 (1955)Google Scholar
Lynga, G., Hansson, N.: Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 6, 327 (1972)Google Scholar
Marsalkova, P. (=Polechova, P.) : Astrophys. Space Sei. 27, 3 (1974)Google Scholar
Mezger, P.G., Henderson, A.P.: Astrophys. J. 147, 471 (1967)Google Scholar
Münch, L.: Bol. Obs. Tonantz. Tac. 2 N° 13, 28 (1955)Google Scholar
Perek, L., Kohoutek, L.: Catalogue of Galactic Planetary Nebulae, Praha (1967)Google Scholar
Palechova, P.: Ph. D. Thesis, Charles University, Praha (1979)Google Scholar
Rodgers, A.W., Campbell, C.T., Whiteoak, J.B.: Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 121, 103 (1960)Google Scholar
Reifenstein, E.C. III, Wilson, T.L., Burke, B.F., Mezger, P.G., Altenhoff, W.J.: Astron. Astrophys. 4, 357 (1970)Google Scholar
Schraml, J., Mezger, P.G.: Astrophys. J. 156, 269 (1969)Google Scholar
Sharpless, S.: Astrophys. J. Suppl. 4, 257 (1959)Google Scholar
Sivan, J.P.: Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat, Université de Provence, France (1977)Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, S.: Astron. J. 71, 990 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walmsley, CM.: unpublished (1973)Google Scholar
Wilson, T.L., Mezger, P.C, Gadner, F.F., Milne, D.K. : Astron. Astrophys. 6, 364 (1970)Google Scholar
Wilson, T.L., Downes, D. (Ed.) : Lecture Notes in Physics 42, Hll-regions and related topics, Springer-Verlag (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar