Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:38:13.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surgical Site Infection After Cardiac Surgery: A Simplified Surveillance Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Jean-Christophe Lucet*
Affiliation:
Unité d'Hygiène et de Lutte Contre l'lnfection Nosocomiale, Hôpital Bichat–Claude Bernard, Paris, France
*
Unité d'Hygiène et de Lutte Contre l'lnfection Nosocomiale, Hôpital Bichat–Claude Bernard, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75877 Paris, France (jean-christophe.lucet@bch.aphp.fr)

Abstract

We report the results of a 2-year, 7-center program of surveillance of deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after cardiac surgery. DSWI was defined as the need for reoperation. Stratification data were abstracted from computerized files. The incidence of DSWI was 2.2% (198 of 8,816 cardiac surgery procedures). The risk factors identified were obesity, age, coronary artery bypass grafting, postoperative mechanical ventilation, and early surgical reexploration. The resource efficiency of this simplified surveillance method is discussed.

Type
Concise Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Roy, MC. Surgical-site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: discriminating site-specific risk factors to improve prevention efforts. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998; 19:229233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Harrington, G, Russo, P, Spelman, D, et al. Surgical-site infection rates and risk factor analysis in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 25:472476.Google Scholar
3. Roy, MC, Herwaldt, LA, Embrey, R, Kuhns, K, Wenzel, RP, Perl, TM. Does the Centers for Disease Control's NNIS system risk index stratify patients undergoing cardiothoracic operations by their risk of surgical-site infection? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:186190.Google Scholar
4. The Parisian Mediastinitis Study Group. Risk factors for deep sternal wound infection after sternotomy: a prospective, multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111:12001207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America; The Association for Practitioners in Infection Control; The Centers for Disease Control; The Surgical Infection Society. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992; 13:599605.Google Scholar
6. Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991; 91:152S157S.Google Scholar
7. Glenister, HM, Taylor, LJ, Bartlett, CL, Cooke, EM, Sedgwick, JA, Mackintosh, CA. An evaluation of surveillance methods for detecting infections in hospital inpatients. J Hosp Infect 1993; 23:229242.Google Scholar
8. Wilson, AP, Gibbons, C, Reeves, BC, et al. Surgical wound infection as a performance indicator: agreement of common definitions of wound infection in 4773 patients. BMJ 2004; 329:720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Evans, RS, Larsen, RA, Burke, JP, et al. Computer surveillance of hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic use. JAMA 1986; 256:10071011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Wenzel, RP, Osterman, CA, Hunting, KJ, Gwaltney, JM Jr. Hospital-acquired infections. I. Surveillance in a university hospital. Am J Epidemiol 1976; 103:251260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16:128140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Weinstein, RA, Siegel, JD, Brennan, PJ. Infection-control report cards—securing patient safety. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:225227.Google Scholar