No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Unity and Difference: A Critical Appraisal of Polarizing Gender Identities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2020
Abstract
In The Phenomenology of Spirit, Hegel draws out the interdependency of unity and difference. In order to have a unity, there must be differences that compose it, as a unity unifies different elements. At the same time, in unifying these elements, they must not cease to be different from one another, as that would reduce the unity to a simple singularity.
In this paper, I take up this interdependency of unity and difference, applying it to gender identities. I follow the psychoanalytically oriented exchange between Judith Butler and Adam Phillips, in which they agree that gender identities are a farce, superimposed upon ungendered subjects, but disagree about the extent to which this artificial binary should be disassembled. Picking up their conversation at this point, I investigate how binary systems of identity can be both injurious and useful. Should they be cast off or does it make sense to keep them? Following this vein of thought, I end with a discussion of good and bad hate, arguing that there is an inescapable need for psychologically productive hate neutralized through empathy.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2012 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy. 1995. Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, Denis. 1998. The bad writing contest. http://denisdutton.com/bad_writing.htm (accessed December 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Epstein, Barbara. 1995. Why poststructuralism is a dead end for progressive thought. Socialist Review 25 (2): 83–119.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The history of sexuality: An introduction. Vol. 1. New York: Random House, Vintage Books Edition.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1925/2006. “Negation.” In The Penguin Freud reader, ed. Phillips, Adam. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1960. The ego and the id. Trans. Riviere, Joan. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1962. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Trans. Strachey, James. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie. 1992. Vested interests: Cross‐dressing and cultural anxiety. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jay R., and Mitchell, Stephen A. 1983. Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. Miller, A.V.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, Carrie. 2006. The ontology of sex: A critical inquiry into the deconstruction and reconstruction of categories. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lather, Patti. 1991. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, Terry. 2000. Feminisms transformed? Post‐structuralism and postmodernism. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. ed. Turner, Bryan S.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Nobus, Danny, and Quinn, Malcolm. 2005. Knowing nothing, staying stupid: Elements for a psychoanalytic epistemology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. The professor of parody. http://www.akad.se/Nussbaum.pdf (accessed December 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Riviere, Joan, and Klein, Melanie. 1964. Love, hate and reparation. London and New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Salih, Sara, ed., with Butler, Judith. 2008. The Judith Butler reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar