Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T00:11:16.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trans as Bodily Becoming: Rethinking the Biological as Diversity, Not Dichotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Riki Lane
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Feminist and trans theory challenges “the” binary sex/gender system, but can create a new binary opposition of subversive transgender versus conservative transsexual. This paper aims to shift debate concerning bodies as authentic/real versus constructed/mutable, arguing that such debate establishes a false dichotomy that may be overcome by reappraising scientific understandings of sex/gender. Much recent biology and neurology stresses nonlinearity, contingency, self-organization, and open-endedness. Engaging with this research offers ways around apparently interminable theoretical impasses.

Type
Transgender Studies and Feminism: Theory, Politics, and Gendered Realities
Information
Hypatia , Volume 24 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Transgender Studies and Feminism: Theory, Politics, and Gendered Realities , Summer 2009 , pp. 136 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angier, Natalie. 1997. Sexual identity not pliable after all, report says. New York Times, March 14.Google Scholar
Bagemihl, Bruce. 1999. Biological exuberance: Animal homosexuality and natural diversity. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 1996. Meeting the universe halfway: Realism and social constructivism without contradiction. In Feminism, science and the philosophy of science, ed. Nelson, L.H. and Nelson, J.London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Birke, Lynda I. A. 2000. Feminism and the biological body. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1984. Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bonchev, Danail, and Rouvray, D. H. 2005. Complexity in chemistry, biology, and ecology. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, Kate. 1994. Gender outlaw: On men, women, and the rest of us. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Breedlove, S. M., and Jordan, C. L. 2001. The increasingly plastic, hormone‐responsive adult brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A 98 (6): 2956–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brizendine, Louann. 2006. The female brain. New York: Morgan Road Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2001. Doing justice to someone: Sex reassignment and allegories of transsexuality. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 7 (4): 621–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2006. Doing justice to someone. In The transgender studies reader, ed. Stryker, Susan and Whittle, Stephen. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng. 1996. Mattering. Diacritics 26 (1): 108–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, W. C., De Vries, G. J., and Swaab, D. F. 2002. Sexual differentiation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in humans may extend into adulthood. Journal of Neuroscience 22 (3): 1027–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devor, Holly. 1989. Gender blending: Confronting the limits of duality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Devor, Holly. 1997. FTM: Female‐to‐male transsexuals in society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, M. 2000. Professor Milton Diamond writes to Greer. AISSG. Available at http://www.medhelp.org/www/ais/debates/letters/DIAMOND.HTM (accessed February 28, 2008).Google Scholar
Diamond, M. 2005. Transsexuality, intersexuality and ethics: First—do no harm. In Transgenders and intersexuals: Everything you ever wanted to know but couldn't think of the question: A resource book for the general community, ed. May, Lois. Bowden, South Australia: Fast Lane.Google Scholar
Diamond, M. 2006. Biased‐interaction theory of psychosexual development: “How does one know if one is male or female?” Sex Roles 55 (9–10): 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, M., and Sigmundson, H. K. 1997a. Management of intersexuality: Guidelines for dealing with persons with ambiguous genitalia. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 151 (10): 1046–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, M., and Sigmundson, H. K. 1997b. Sex reassignment at birth: Long‐term review and clinical implications. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 151 (3): 298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R., and King, D. 2006. The transgender phenomenon. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Leslie. 1996. Transgender warriors: Making history from Joan of Arc to Dennis Rodman. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana. 1989. Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature & difference. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goiar, Charlotte. 2008. Harry Benjamin's Syndrome: Retrospective and terminology issues. Available at http://shb‐info.org/retrospective.html (accessed September 10, 2008).Google Scholar
Gooren, L. 2006. The biology of human psychosexual differentiation. Hormones and Behavior 50 (4): 589–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosz, E.A. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. St. Leonards, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Grosz, E.A. 2004. The nick of time: Politics, evolution, and the untimely. Crows Nest, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, E.A. 2005. Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Crows Nest, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, K. 2004. Twisting the knife: Discrimination in the law. Deakin Law Review 9 (2): 339–63.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association.Google Scholar
Hird, Myra J. 2004. Sex, gender, and science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISNA. 2008. Search results. Intersex Society of North America. Available at http://www.isna.org/search/node/Diamond?from=0 (accessed February 26, 2008).Google Scholar
Keane, H., and Rosengarten, M. 2002. On the biology of sexed subjects. Australian Feminist Studies 17:261–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Suzanne J. 2007. Interview. SUNY College Purchase, N.Y., September 10.Google Scholar
Kruijver, F. P., Zhou, J. N., Pool, C. W., Hofman, M. A., Gooren, L. J., and Swaab, D. F. 2000. Male‐to‐female transsexuals have female neuron numbers in a limbic nucleus. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 85 (5): 2034–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVay, S. 1991. A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men. Science 253 (5023): 1034–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, Simon A., Grenfell, Bryan, Hastings, Alan, and Perelson, Alan S. 1997. Mathematical and computational challenges in population biology and ecosystems science. Science 275 (5298): 334–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, Wendy, and Kessler, Suzanne J. 2000. Retrospective response. Feminism and Psychology 10 (1): 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namaste, Viviane K. 2000. Invisible lives: The erasure of transsexual and transgendered people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Mary. 1981. The politics of reproduction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Oyama, Susan. 1985. The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prosser, Jay. 1998. Second skins: The body narratives of transsexuality (Gender and culture series). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Prosser, Jay. 2006. Judith Butler: Queer feminism, transgender and the transubstantiation of sex. In The transgender studies reader, ed. Stryker, Susan and Whittle, Stephen. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. 2008. Phantom penises in transsexuals. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15:5–16.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., and Hirstein, W. 1998. The perception of phantom limbs: The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain 121 (pt. 9): 1603–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, Terry. 2006. Atypical gender development: A review. International Journal of Transgenderism 9 (1): 29–44.Google Scholar
Roberts, Celia. 2000. Biological behaviour? Hormones, psychology and sex. NWSA Journal 12 (3): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Lesley J. 1999. Sexing the brain (Maps of the mind). London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, Joan. 2004. Evolution's rainbow: Diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Henry S. 1998. Phenomenology as method in trans studies. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 4 (2): 263–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Henry S. 1999. Trans studies: Between a metaphysics of presence and absence. In Reclaiming genders: transsexual grammars at the fin de siècle, ed. More, Kate and Whittle, Stephen. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Rubin, Henry S. 2003. Self‐made men: Identity and embodiment among transsexual men. Nashville, Tenn: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Serano, Julia. 2007. Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Emeryville, Calif: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Serano, Julia. 2008. A bio‐experiential model of transsexuality. Paper presented to the Transsomatechnics: Theories and practices of transgender embodiment Conference, Vancouver, May 1–3, 2008.Google Scholar
Spanier, Bonnie. 1995. Im/partial science: Gender ideology in molecular biology, race, gender, and science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Stoller, R. J. 1966. The mother's contribution to infantile transvestic behaviour. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 47 (2): 384–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Stone, Sandy. 1991. The empire strikes back: A posttranssexual manifesto. In Body guards: The cultural politics of gender ambiguity, ed. Epstein, Julia and Straub, Kristina. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swaab, D. 2007. Interview. Amsterdam, September 18.Google Scholar
Wallbank, Rachael. 2004. Re Kevin in perspective. Deakin Law Review 9 (2): 461–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, Stephen. 2006. Foreword. In The transgender studies reader, ed. Stryker, Susan and Whittle, Stephen. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wijngaard, Marianne van den. 1997. Reinventing the sexes: The biomedical construction of femininity and masculinity, race, gender, and science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Elizabeth A. 1999. Introduction: Somatic compliance—feminism, biology and science. Australian Feminist Studies 14 (29): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Elizabeth A. 2004. Psychosomatic: Feminism and the neurological body. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Glenn D., and Rahman, Qazi. 2005. Born gay: The psychobiology of sex orientation. London: Peter Owen.Google Scholar
Zhou, J. N., Hofman, M. A., Gooren, L. J., and Swaab, D. F. 1995. A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality. Nature 378 (6552): 68–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed