Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:04:28.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Timing Problems: When Care and Violence Converge in Stephen King's Horror Novel Christine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Judith Butler, Joan Tronto, and Stephen King all hinge human experience on shared ontological vulnerability, but whereas Butler and Tronto use vulnerability to build ethical commitments, King exploits aging, disability, and death to frighten us. King's horror genre is provocative for the imaginative landscape of feminist theory precisely because he uses vulnerability to magnify the anxieties of mass culture. In Christine, the characters' shared susceptibility to psychic and physical injury blurs the boundary between care and violence. Like Butler, King depicts our social worlds encrusted with normative violence: the mundane ways that norms police gender, race, class, and disability identities. And like Butler, King makes undecidability a key feature of human identity: the idea that needs and identities are uncertain. Normative violence and undecidability trouble the starting point of Tronto's care theory—attentiveness to needs—because both concepts invest interdependency with ambiguity and conflict. But like Tronto, King recognizes that care‐actors must act, even amid ambiguity and even when their actions make care and aggression converge. Christine's supernatural plot details the psychic possession of an American teenager, but the novel's more terrifying story is about interdependency and how normative violence is not the antithesis of care, but its dark underbelly.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The promise of happiness. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badley, Linda C. 1987. Love and death in the American car: Stephen King's auto‐erotic horror. In The gothic world of Stephen King: Landscape and nightmares, ed. Hoppenstand, Gary and Browne, Ray B.Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green State University, Popular Press.Google Scholar
Bichell, Rae Ellen. 2016. Suicide rates climb in U.S., especially among adolescent girls. Morning Edition, April 22. http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/04/22/474888854/suicide-rates-climb-in-u-s-especially-among-adolescent-girls (accessed January 11, 2017).Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. 2007. Introduction. In Stephen King, ed. Bloom, Harold. Philadelphia: Chelsea House.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2001. Giving an account of oneself. Diacritics 31 (4): 2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2003. Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2007. Reply from Judith Butler to Mills and Jenkins. Differences 18 (2): 180–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2011. Remarks on “Queer bonds.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 17 (2–3): 381–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2014. On cruelty. London Review of Books 36 (14): 3133.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, and Athanasiou, Athena. 2013. Dispossession: The performative in the political. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Center for Disease Control (CDC). 2015. Suicide prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/suicide/youth_suicide.html (accessed August 2, 2016).Google Scholar
Center for Disease Control (CDC). 2014. 10 Leading causes of death by age group, United States—2014. http://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_death_age_group_2014_1050w760h.gif (accessed August 2, 2016).Google Scholar
Cloyes, Kristin G. 2002. Agonizing care: Care ethics, agonistic feminism and a political theory of care. Nursing Inquiry 9 (3): 203–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collings, Michael R. 1986. The films of Stephen King. Mercer Island, Wash.: Starmont House.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina. 2007. “Well, you go there to get off”: Visiting feminist care ethics through a women's bathhouse. Feminist Theory 8 (3): 243–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Jonathan P. 1994. Stephen King's America. Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green State University, Popular Press.Google Scholar
DeWitt, Jack. 2010. Cars and culture: The cars of American Graffiti. American Poetry Review 39 (5): 4750.Google Scholar
Engster, Daniel. 2004. Care ethics and natural law theory: Toward an institutional political theory of caring. Journal of Politics 66 (1): 113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engster, Daniel, and Hamington, Maurice. 2015. Introduction. In Care ethics and political theory, ed. Daniel Engster and Maurice Hamington. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Berenice, and Tronto, Joan C. 1990. Toward a feminist theory of caring. In Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives, ed. Abel, Emily and Nelson, Margaret. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Grainge, Paul. 2000. Nostalgia and style in retro America: Moods, modes, and media recycling. Journal of American Culture 23 (1): 2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 2015. Care and justice, still. In Care ethics and political theory, ed. Daniel Engster and Maurice Hamington. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Grady. 2013. The great Stephen King reread: Christine. January 17. http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/01/the-great-stephen-king-reread-christine (accessed October 12, 2015).Google Scholar
Hirschberger, Gilad, Florian, Victor, and Mikulincer, Mario. 2005. Fear and compassion: A terror management analysis of emotional reactions to physical disability. Rehabilitation Psychology 50 (3): 246–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2013. Queer/fear: Disability, sexuality, and the other. Journal of Medical Humanities 34 (2): 139–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Christine. 2013. Building bridges with accessible care: Disability studies, feminist care scholarship, and beyond. Hypatia 28 (4): 784800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khader, Serene J. 2011. Beyond inadvertent ventriloquism: Caring virtues for anti‐paternalistic development practice. Hypatia 26 (4): 742–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Stephen. 1981/2011. Danse macabre. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
King, Stephen. 1983/2011. Christine. London: Hodder.Google Scholar
King, Stephen. 2008. Night shift. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
King, Stephen. 2010. On writing: A memoir of the craft. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
King, Stephen. 2015. Christine. http://stephenking.com/library/novel/christine_inspiration.html (accessed October 15, 2015).Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Madden, Edward. 2007. Cars are girls: Sexual power and sexual panic in Stephen King's Christine. In Stephen King, ed. Bloom, Harold. New York: Chelsea House.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan. 2014. Introduction: What is vulnerability, and why does it matter for moral theory? In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magistrale, Tony. 1988. Landscape of fear: Stephen King's American gothic. Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green State University, Popular Press.Google Scholar
Magistrale, Tony. 2010. Stephen King: America's storyteller. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mills, Catherine. 2007. Normative violence, vulnerability, and responsibility. Differences 18 (2): 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miniño, Arialdi. 2010. Mortality among teenagers aged 12‐19 years: United States, 1999–2006. NCHS Data Brief 37 (May): 17.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David T., and Snyder, Sharon L. 2000. Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Michelle. 2015. Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 717–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettersen, Tove. 2012. Conceptions of care: Altruism, feminism, and mature care. Hypatia 27 (2): 366–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Judith. 2007. Care. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google ScholarPubMed
Ruddick, Sara. 1995. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sander‐Staudt, Maureen. 2006. The unhappy marriage of care ethics and virtue ethics. Hypatia 21 (4): 2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, John. 2011. Stephen King's gothic. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit. 2000. Becoming vulnerable: Contagious encounters and the ethics of risk. Journal of Medical Humanities 21 (4): 215227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simplican, Stacy Clifford. 2015. Care, disability, and violence: Theorizing complex dependency in Eva Kittay and Judith Butler. Hypatia 30 (1): 217–33.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1995. Care as a basis for radical political judgments. Hypatia 10 (2): 141–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 2001. Who cares? Public and private caring and the rethinking of citizenship. In Women and welfare: Theory and practice in the United States and Europe, ed. Hirschmann, Nancy and Liebert, Ulrike. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 2002. The “nanny” question in feminism. Hypatia 17 (2): 3451.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 2013. Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
White, Julie Anne. 2015. Practicing care at the margins: Other‐mothering as public care. In Care ethics and political theory, ed. Engster, Daniel and Hamington, Maurice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar