Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:58:00.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Terrorism, Evil, and Everyday Depravity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Bat-Ami Bar On
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay expresses ambivalence about the use of the term “evil” in analyses of terrorism in light of the association of the two in speeches intended to justify the United States’“war on terrorism.” At the same time, the essay suggests that terrorism can be regarded as “evil” but only when considered among a multiplicity of “evils” com-parable to it, for example: rape, war crimes, and repression.

Type
Forum on September 11, 2001: Feminist Perspectives on Terrorism
Information
Hypatia , Volume 18 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Philosophy and the Problem of Evil , Winter 2003 , pp. 157 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bar On, Bat‐Ami. 1991. Why terrorism is morally problematic. In Feminist ethics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Bar On, Bat‐Ami. 2002. An Arendtean scaffolding for thinking about terrorism. ORD and BILD (2/3): 53–57.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1993. The transparency of evil: essays on extreme phenomena. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F. 1997. Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Ben‐Sasson, Haiim H., ed. 1976. A history of the Jewish people. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bush, George W. 2002. State of the union. Retrieved 15 March 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/release/2002/01/20020129‐ll.html.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1996a. Rape as a weapon of war. Hypatia: Hypatia 11(4): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1996b. The unnatural lottery: Character and moral luck. Philadelphia: Temple University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Pirates and emperors: International terrorism in the real world. New York: Claremont Research and Publications.Google Scholar
Debord, Guy. 1977. Society of the spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red.Google Scholar
Gutman, Roy, and Rieff, David eds., 1999. Crimes of war: What the public should know. CITY New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hitchens, Christopher. 2001. Against rationalization. Retrieved 15 March 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtmli=20011008&s=hit%20chensi=200110.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 2000. Virtual war: Kososvo and beyond. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Lara, María Pía ed., 2001. Rethinking evil: Contemporary perspectives. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Ophir, Adi. 2001. Speaking evil: Towards an ontology of morals. Tel Aviv: Am Oved.Google Scholar
Reagan, Ronald. 1982. The evil empire. Retrieved 15 March 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.townhall.com/halloffame/reagan/speech/empire.html.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1967. The symbolism of evil. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Richard E. 1987. Alchemists of revolution: Terrorism in the modern world. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Terkel, Studs. 1984. The good war: An oral history of World War Two. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Thomas, Laurence Mordekhai. 1993. Vessels of evil: American slavery and the Holocaust. Philadelphia: Temple University.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1971. World War II: Why was this war different? Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(1): 3–21.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1968. Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar