Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:24:53.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Standpoint Theory as a Methodology for the Study of Power Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Standpoint Theory
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Amy. 1989. Rethinking power. Hypatia 13 (1): 2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Amy. 2008. Power and the politics of difference: Oppression, empowerment, and transnational justice. Hypatia 23 (3): 156–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohan, John Alan. 2002. “I didn't know” and “I was only doing my job”: Has corporate governance careened out of control? A case study of Enron's information myopia. Journal of Business Ethics 40:275–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crasnow, Sharon. 2007. Feminist anthropology and sociology: Issues for social science. In Philosophy of anthropology and sociology, ed. Turner, Stephen P. and Risjord, Mark W.Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 755–89.Google Scholar
Crasnow, Sharon. 2008. Feminist philosophy of science: “Standpoint” and knowledge. Science and Education 17:1089–110.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2006. Powerlessness and social interpretation. Episteme 3 (1–2): 96108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, Ronald. 1996. The feminism question in the philosophy of science. In Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science, ed. Nelson, Lynn Hankinson and Nelson, Jack. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, Ronald. 1999. Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 2000. Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. In Provoking feminisms, ed. Allen, Carolyn and Howard, Judith A.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 934.Google Scholar
Husu, Liisa. 2001. Sexism, support and survival in academia: Academic women and hidden discrimination in Finland. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kantola, Johanna. 2008. “Why do all the women disappear?” Gendering processes in a political science department. Gender, Work and Organization 15 (2): 202–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katila, Saija, and Meriläinen, Susan. 1999. A serious researcher or just another nice girl? Doing gender in a male dominated scientific community. Gender, Work and Organization 6 (3): 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Iddo. 2008. Problems with feminist standpoint theory in science education. Science and Education 17:1081–88.Google Scholar
Pinnick, Cassandra. 1994. Feminist epistemology: Implications for philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science 61:646–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinnick, Cassandra. 2005. The failed feminist challenge to “fundamental epistemology”. Science and Education 14:103–16.Google Scholar
Rolin, Kristina. 2006. The bias paradox in feminist standpoint epistemology. Episteme 3 (1–2): 125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy. 1993. Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sismondo, Sergio. 1995. The scientific domains of feminist standpoints. Perspectives on Science 3 (1): 4965.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2004. Why standpoint matters. In The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies, ed. Harding, Sandra. New York: Routledge, pp. 339–51.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar