Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:12:10.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lupita's Dress: Care in Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Colin Danby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carol Gilligan's temporally embedded caring subjects reason in terms of relationships with and forward-looking responsibilities to others, and consider how their decisions will shape future ties. Subsequent work in philosophy and economics has had difficulty developing these aspects because of an underlying social ontology that excludes them. This paper draws on a heterodox tradition, post-Keynesianism, to develop an alternative social ontology and an analysis of material life that takes time fully into account.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Fall 2004 , pp. 23 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Emily K., and Nelson, Margaret K. 1990. Circles of care: An introductory essay. In Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives, ed. Abel, Emily K. and Nelson, Margaret K.Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2000. Philosophy matters: A review of recent work in feminist philosophy. Signs 25 (3): 841‐‐82.Google Scholar
Benerfa, Lourdes, and Roldán, Martha. 1987. The crossroads of class and gender. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2000. Institutions and culture: Neo‐Weberian economic anthropology. Journal of Economic Issues 34(4):771–88.Google Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1993. Gilligan and Kohlberg: Implications for moral theory. In An ethic of care, ed. Larrabee, Mary Jeanne. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Trans.Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1991. Patterns of dissonance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1990. Gender and moral luck. In Identity, character, andmorality: Essays in moral psychology, ed. Rorty, Amelie Ocksenberg and Flanagan, Owen. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Charusheela, S. 2001. Women's choices and the ethnocentrism/relativism dilemma. In Postmodernism, economics and knowledge, ed. Cullenberg, Stephen, Amariglio, Jack, and Ruccio, David. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Charusheela, S. 2000. On history, love, and politics. Ret/vin/cing Marxism 12 (4): 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalmiya, Vrinda. 2001a. Knowing people. In Knowledge, truth, and duty, ed. Steup, Matthias. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalmiya, Vrinda. 2001b. Dogged loyalties: A classical Indian intervention in care ethics. In Ethics in the world religions, ed. Runzo, Joseph and Martin, Nancy M.Oxford: One world.Google Scholar
Danby, Colin. 2004. Toward a gendered post‐Keynesianism: Subjectivity and time in a nonmodernist framework. Feminist Economics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danby, Colin. 2002. The curse of the modern: A post‐Keynesian critique of the gift/exchange dichotomy. Research in Economic Anthropology 21: 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Paul 1994. Post‐Keynesian macroeconomic theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
DeFiore, JoAnn. 2002. Comrades en el barrio: The cultural practice of co‐mothering in a rural Paraguyan neighborhood. In Child care and inequality: Re‐thinking carework for children and youth, ed. Cancian, Francesca, Kurz, Demie, London, Andrew, Reviere, Rebecca, and Tuominen, Mary. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans.Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
DeVault, Marjorie L. 1991. Feeding the family: The social organization of caringas gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Di Leonardo, Micaela. 1987. The female world of cards and holidays: Women, families and the work of kinship. Signs 12:3.Google Scholar
Dow, Sheila. 2001. Post‐Keynesian methodology. In A new guide to post‐Keynesian economics, ed. Holt, Richard P. and Pressman, Steven. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dow, Sheila. 1985. Macroeconomic thought: A methodological approach. Oxford: Basil Black‐well.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rhian. 1983. The way to a man's heart: Food in the violent home. In The sociology of food and eating, ed. Murcott, Anne. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Errington, Shelly. 1990. Introduction to Power and difference: Gender in island Southeast Asia ed. Atkinson, Jane Monnig and Errington, Shelly. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Berenice, and Tronto, Joan C. 1990. Toward a feminist theory of caring. In Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives, ed. Abel, Emily K. and Nelson, Margaret K.Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy. 2001. The invisible heart: Economics and family values. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Foldvary, Fred E. 1996. Beyond neoclassical economics: Heterodox approaches to economic theory Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1977. Studies in social and political theory London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1993. Reply to Critics. In An ethic of care, ed. Jeanne Larrabee, Mary. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, and Wiggins, Grant. 1987. The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. In The emergence of morality in young children, ed. Kagan, Jerome and Lamb, Sharon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1992. The nature of economic relations. In Understanding economic process, ed. Ortiz, Sutti and Lees, Susan. Society for Economic Anthropology, Monographs in Economic Anthropology, No. 10. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Gudeman, Stephen. 2001. Postmodern gifts. In Postmodernism, economics, and knowledge, ed. Cullenberg, Stephen, Amariglio, Jack, and Ruccio, David. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guyer, Jane. 1997. Endowments and assets: The anthropology of wealth and the economics of intrahousehold allocation. In lntrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries, ed. Haddad, Lawrenceet al. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Jane, and Peters, Pauline. 1987. Introduction: Conceptualizing the household. Development and Change 18(2):197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanmer, Lucia G., and Haroon Akram‐Lodhi, A. 1998. In “The House of the Spirits”: Toward a post‐Keynesian theory of the household? Journal of Post'Keynesian Economics 20(3): 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Olivia. 1981. Households as natural units. In Of marriage and the market: Women's subordination in international perspective, ed. Young, Kate, Wolkowitz, Carol, and McCullagh, Roslyn. London: CSE Books.Google Scholar
Hart, Gillian. 1992. Imagined unities: Constructions of “the household” in economic theory. In Understanding economic process, ed. Ortiz, Sutti and Lees, Susan. Society. for Economic Anthropology, Monographs in Economic Anthropology, No. 10. Lanham, Md.: University Press of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Hefner, Robert W., ed. 1998. Introduction to Market cultures: Society and values in the new Asian capitalisms. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 2002. Care and the extension of markets. Hypatia 17(2):19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1999. Liberalism and the ethics of care. In On feminist ethics and politics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1985. Time in economics. In Money, interest and wages: Collected essays on economic theory, Vol. 2, ed. Hicks, J.R.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1969. A theory of economic history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1992. Lesbian ethics and female agency. In Explorations in feminist ethics, ed. Cole, Eve Browning and Coultrap‐McQuinn, Susan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1991. Some thoughts about “caring.” In Feminist ethics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Hoodfar, Homa. 1988. Patterns of household budgeting and the management of financial affairs in a lower‐income neighbourhood in Cairo. In A home divided: Women and income in the third world, ed. Dwyer, Daisy Hilse and Bruce, Judith. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, Ann. 1994. Toward a feminist expansion of macroeconomics: Money matters. journal of Economic Issues 28(2): 555–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1937. The general theory of employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 51: 209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. E. 2002. A history of post‐Keynesian economics since 1936. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eve Feder. 1999. Low's labor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Marc. 1992. Foundations of post‐Keynesian economic analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lawson, Tony. 2003. Reorienting economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, Ching Kwan. 1998. Gender and the South China miracle. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Lee. 1995. Toward a feminist, post‐Keynesian theory of investment. In Out of the margin: Feminist perspectives on economics, ed. Kuiper, Edith. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1990. The gift. Trans.Halls, W. D.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nelson, Julie. 2003. Confronting the science/value split: Notes on feminist economics, institutionalism, pragmatism and process thought. Cambridge Journaf of Economics 27(1): 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Julie, and England, Paula. 2002. Feminist philosophies of love and work. Hypatia 17(2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 2002. Starting at home: Caring and socialpolicy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry. 1996. Making gender: The politics and erotics of culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Rapp, Rayna. 1987. Toward a “nuclear freeze”? The gender politics of Euro‐American kinship analysis. In Feminism and kinship theory, ed. Yanagisako, Sylvia and Collier, Jane. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1980. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6(2): 342–67.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1982. Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 1998. Citizens/lip and the ethics of care. Trans.Savage, Liz. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shackle, G.L.S. 1969. Decision, order, and time in human affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, Ursula. 1986. Women's work, class, and the urban household: A study of Shimla, North India. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Sheth, Falguni A. 2004. An assessment of feminist accounts of care‐work. Working paper.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. 1988. Continental philosophy since 1750: The rise and fall of the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1976. The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stack, Carol. 1974. All our kin. Boston: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Staveren, Irene van. 1996. The care/justice debate: A parallel exploration into the history of economic thought. Paper presented to the IAFFE conference in Washington D.C., June 21‐‐23.Google Scholar
Staveren, Irene van. 2001. Values of economics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, Barrie 2001. Pick‐up time at Oakdale elementary school: Work and family from the vantage points of children. In Working families: The transformation of the American home, ed. Hertz, Rosanna and Marshall, Nancy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 1995. Care as a basis for radical political judgments. Hypatia 10 (2): 141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 2002. The “nanny” question in feminism. Hypatia 17(2): 34–51.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein 1961. The place of science in modern civilization. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Vickers, Douglas. 1994. Economics and the antagonism of time: Time, uncertainty, and choice in economic theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Ann. 1981. “I'm hungry, mum”: The politics of domestic budgeting. In Of marriage and the market: Women's subordination in international perspective, ed. Young, Kate, Wolkowitz, Carol, and McCullagh, Roslyn. London: CSE Books.Google Scholar
Williams, Joan. 2000. Unbending gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia. 1979. Family and households: The analysis of domestic groups. Annual Review of Anthropology 8:161–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Mayfair Mei‐hui. 1994. Gifts, favors, and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar