No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Eudaimonism, Human Nature, and the Burdened Virtues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Abstract
This article explores the prospects for a eudaimonist moral theory that is both feminist and Aristotelian. Making the moral philosophy developed by Aristotle compatible with a feminist moral perspective presents a number of philosophical challenges. Lisa Tessman offers one of the most sustained feminist engagements with Aristotelian eudaimonism (Tessman 2005). However, in arguing for the account of flourishing that her eudaimonist theory invokes, Tessman avoids taking a stand either for or against the role Aristotle assigned to human nature. She draws her account of flourishing instead from the beliefs about flourishing implicit in the feminist and black freedom movements. I examine the implicit conception of flourishing in the writings of two prominent leaders of the black freedom movement—Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X—and argue that Tessman's attempt to avoid the “sticky issue” of human nature is not successful. Tessman's defense of the burdened virtues depends on a particular reading of human nature as does a eudaimonist account of the virtues more generally.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Aristotle, . 1984. Rhetoric. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1999. Nicomachean ethics, ed. Irwin, Terence. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990a. Feminine masochism and the politics of personal transformation. In Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990b. On psychological oppression. In Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, Macalester. 2006. Review of Burdened virtues: Virtue ethics for liberatory struggles. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/25046-burdened-virtues-virtue-ethics-for-liberatory-struggles/ (accessed November 4, 2014).Google Scholar
Breitman, George, ed. 1965/1989. Malcolm X speaks: Selected speeches and statements. New York: Pathfinder.Google Scholar
Breitman, George, ed. 1970. By any means necessary: Speeches, interviews, and a letter by Malcolm X. New York: Pathfinder.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1996. The unnatural lottery: Character and moral luck. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Kenneth B. 1969. The new negro in the north. In The new negro, ed. Ahmann, Matthew. New York: Biblio and Tannen.Google Scholar
Cone, James H. 1991. Martin & Malcolm & America: A dream or a nightmare. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
Cuomo, Chris. 1998. Feminism and ecological communities: An ethic of flourishing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. 1995. Feminist communities and moral revolution. In Feminism and community, ed. Friedman, Marilyn and Weiss, Penny. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1992. White woman feminist, 1983–1992. In Willful virgin: Essays in feminism, 1976–1992. Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 1993. Sisters of the yam: Black women and self‐recovery. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
Kruks, Sonia. 2005. Simone de Beauvoir and the politics of privilege. Hypatia 20 (1): 178–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in western philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984. Eye to eye: Black women, hatred, and anger. In Sister outsider. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 1995. Hard‐to‐handle anger. In Overcoming sexism and racism, ed. Bell, Linda and Blumenfeld, David. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mahowald, Mary Broidy. 1978. Philosophy of woman: Classical to current concepts. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Malcolm, X. 1973. The autobiography of Malcolm X, ed. Haley, Alex. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Peter. 1997. Contemporary virtue ethics and Aristotle. In Virtue ethics: A critical reader, ed. Statman, Daniel. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, Nancy. 2002. Virtue and the oppression of women. In Feminist moral philosophy, ed. Brennan, Samantha. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1989. Anger and insubordination. In Women, knowledge, and reality, ed. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Tessman, Lisa. 2005. Burdened virtues: Virtue ethics for liberatory struggles. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. 1993. The less noble sex: Scientific, religious, and philosophical conceptions of woman's nature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Washington, James Melvin, ed. 1986. A testament of hope: The essential writings of Martin Luther King, Jr. San Francisco: Harper and Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1792/2004. A vindication of the rights of woman, ed. Brody, Miriam. London: Penguin.Google Scholar