Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:20:13.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cultural Alterity: Cross-Cultural Communication and Feminist Theory in North-South Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

How to communicate with “the other” who is culturally different from oneself is one of the greatest challenges facing North-South relations. This paper builds on existential-phenomenological and poststructuralist concepts of alterity and difference to strengthen the position of Latina and other subaltern speakers in North-South dialogue. It defends a postcolonial approach to feminist theory as a basis for negotiating culturally differentiated feminist positions in this age of accelerated globalization, migration, and displacement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anzaldúa, Gloria 1987. Borderlunds/LA frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt.Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, Simone. 1952. The second sex. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Beverley, John, Oviedo, José, and Aronna, Michael, eds. 1995. The postmodemism debate in Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz 1963. Black skins, white masks. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Femández Retamar, Roberto. 1989. Cdbun and other essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
García Canclini, Néstor. 1995. Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Grewal, Inderpal, and Kaplan, Caren, eds. 1994. Scattered hegemonies: Postmodwnity and transnational feminist practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell 1984. Feminist theory: From mrgin to center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1993. An ethics of sexual difference. Ithaca: Come11 University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia 1981. Women's time. Signs 7(1): 1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia 1991. Strangers to ourselwes. Trans. Roudiez, Leon S.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1979. Totality and infinity. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean FranGois. 1984. The postmodern codtion: A report on knowledge. Trans. Bennington, Geoff and Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Minh‐ha, Trinh T. 1989. Womn, natiwe, other: Writing postcolonidity and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Olea, Raquel 1995. Feminism: modern or postmodem? In The postmodem debate in Latin America. See Beverley, John et al. 1995.Google Scholar
Richard, Nelly 1993. The Latin American problematic of theoretical‐cultural transference: Postmodem appropriations and counterappropriations. South Atlantic Quarterly 92(3): 453–59.Google Scholar
Richard, Nelly 1996. Feminismo, experiencia y representacibn. Revista Iberonmericana: Special issue on Latin American cultural criticism and literary theory, ed. Moraña, Mabel. 62(176–77): 733–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagar, Aparajita 1996. Postcolonial studies. In A dictionary of cultural and critical theory, ed. Payne, Michael. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1990. The post‐colonial critic. Ed. Harasym, Sarah. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1993. Outsde the teaching machine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar