Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T10:32:24.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cheshire Calhoun's Project of Separating Lesbian Theory from Feminist Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Ann Ferguson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I support Cheshire Calhoun's argument that there is a distinctive type of sexuality injustice addressed to lesbians and gays, but challenge her definitional strategy regarding the concepts of “lesbian” and “gay” and the “universalistic essentialist” distinction that she draws between patriarchy and compulsory heterosexuality. Finally, I take issue with the political implications of her claim that lesbians’ and gays’ special oppression stems from our exclusion from the legal prerogatives of marriage and parenthood.

Type
Author Meets Critics Panel: APA Eastern Division Meeting, 1996
Information
Hypatia , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Winter 1998 , pp. 214 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, Judith 1994. Against proper objects, differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 6(2&3): 1–26.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 1993. Denaturalizing and desexualizing lesbian and gay identity. Virginia Law Review 79: 1859–75.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 1994. Separating lesbian theory from feminist theory. Ethics 104: 558–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 1995a. The gender closet: Lesbian disappearance under the sign “woman.” Feminist Studies 21(1): 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 1995b. Sexual injustice. Symposium on sexual orientation. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 9: 241–74.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 1997. Family's outlaws: Rethinking the connections between feminism, lesbianism, and the family. In Feminism and families, ed. Lindemann Nelson, Hilde. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calhoun, CheshireNd. Must lesbian choices be feminist choices?Symposium on Claudia Card's Lesbian Choices: Journal of Homosexuality.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia 1995. Lesbian choices. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann 1989. Blood at the root: Motherhood, sexuality and male dominance. London: Pandora/Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 1991. Sexual democracy: Women, oppression and revolution. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1978. A history of sexuality, Vol. I: An introduction: The will to know. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hall, Radclyffe 1990. The well of loneliness. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Heidi 1981. The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism. In Women and Revolution, ed. Sargent, Lydia. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Omi, Michael and Winant, Howard 1994. Racial formations in the United States. 2d ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne 1980. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs 5(4): 631–60.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle 1975. The traffic in women. In Toward a new anthropology of women, ed. Rayna Reiter. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle 1984. Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality, ed. Vance, Carole. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle, with Butler, Judith 1994. Sexual traffic, differences: A Joumal of Feminist Cultural Studies 6(2&3): 62–99.Google Scholar