Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T04:23:06.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

At the Limits of Discourse: Heterogeneity, Alterity, and the Maternal Body in Kristeva's Thought.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Ewa Ziarek
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay situates Kristeva's theory of semiotics in the context of the controversial debate about the status of the maternal body in her work. I argue that, if we rethink the opposition between the semiotic and the symbolic as the relation between the trace and the sign, it becomes clear that the maternal semiotic is irreducible either to the prelinguistic plenitude or to the alternative symbolic position. The second part of the essay develops the connection between Kristeva's linguistic theory and the alterity of the maternal body, articulated here as the in-fold of the other and the same.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 7 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Philosophy and Language , Spring 1992 , pp. 91 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burke, Carolyn Greenstein. 1978. Report from Paris: Women's writing and the women's movement. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 3: 843–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Carolyn Greenstein. 1987. Rethinking the maternal. In The future of difference, ed. Eisenstein, Hester and Jardine, Alice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of grammatology, Trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge. Trans. Sheridan Smith, A. M.New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1982. The daughter's seduction: Feminism and psychoanalysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasche’, Rodolphe. 1986. The tain of the mirror: Derrick and the philosophy of reflection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1989. Sexual subversions: Three French feminists. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1990. Jacques Lacan: A feminist introduction. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobus, Mary. 1986. Reading woman: Essays in feminist criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Ann Rosalind. 1984. Julia Kristeva on femininity: The limits of a semiotic politic. Feminist Review 18: 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art, ed. Roudiez, Leon S., Trans. Thomas Gora, Alice Jardine, and Roudiez, Leon S.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of horror: An essay on abjection, Trans. Roudiez, Leon S.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1983. Within the microcosm of “the talking cure.” In Interpreting Lacan. Vol. 6. Psychiatry and Humanities, ed. Smith, Joseph H. and Kerrigan, William. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1984. Revolution in poetic language, Trans. Waller, Margaret. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1986a. Stabat mater. In The Kristeva reader, ed. Moi, Toril. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1986b. System and the speaking subject. In The Kristeva Reader, ed. Moi, Toril. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1986c. Women's time. In The Kristeva Reader, ed. Moi, Toril. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1989. Talking about Polylogue. In French feminist thought: A reader, ed. Moi, Toril. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuykendall, Eleanor H. 1989. Questions for Julia Kristeva's ethics of linguistics. In The thinking muse: Feminism and modem French philosophy, ed. Allen, Jeffner and Young, Iris Marion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Ecrits, trans. Alan Sheridan New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lewis, Philip E. 1974. Revolutionary Semiotics. Diacritics 4: 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moi, Toril. 1985. Sexual/textual politics: Feminist literary theory. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1969. Timaeits. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. In The collected dialogues of Plato, ed. Hamilton, Edith and Huntington'Caims, . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Jacqueline. 1986. Sexuality in the field of vision. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Silverman, Kaja. 1988. The acoustic mirror: The female voice in psychoanalysis and cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Stanton, Domna. 1987. Language and revolution: The Franco‐American dis‐connection. In The future of difference, ed. Eisenstein, Hester and Jardine, Alice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Stanton, Domna. 1989. Difference on trial: A critique of the maternal metaphor in Cixous, Irigaray, and Kristeva. In The Thinking Muse, ed. Allen, Jeffner and Young, Iris Marion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan Rubin. 1985. Writing and motherhood. In The (m)other tongue: Essays in feminist psychoanalytic interpretation, ed. Nelson Garner, Shirley, Kahane, Claire, and Sprengnether, Madelon. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar