Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T22:47:36.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anti-Essentialism in Practice: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Third wave anti-essentialist critique has too often been used to dismiss second wave feminist projects. I examine chims that Carol Gilligan's work is “essentialist,” and argue that her recent research requires this criticism be rethought. Anti-essentialist feminist method should consist in attention to the relations of power that construct accounts of gendered identity in the course of different forms of empirical enquiry, not in rejecting any general claim about women or girls.

Type
Third Revision
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bordo, Susan. 1993. Feminism, postmodernism, and gender skepticism. Ii Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Lyn Mikel and Gilligan, Carol. 1992. Meeting at the crossroads: Women's psychology and girls' development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674731837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sxiology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Mary. 1989. Gilligan's different voice: A perspective for nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing 5(1): 10–6.10.1016/S8755-7223(89)80029-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Stefano, Christine. 1991. Configurations of masculinity: A feminist perspective on modem political theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Nicholson, Linda. 1990. Social criticism without philosophy. Ii Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frazer, Elizabeth. 1988. Teenage girls talking about class. Sociobgy 22(3): 343–58.Google Scholar
Frazer, Elizabeth. 1992. Talking about gender, race, and class. Ii Researching language: Issues of power and method, ed. Cameron, Deborahet al. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana. 1989. Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature, and difference. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1988. Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1986. Forum: Reply by Carol Gilligan. Signs 11(2): 324–33.10.1086/494226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1990. Joining the resistance: Psychology, politics, girls, and women. Michigan Quarterly Review v. 29: 501–36.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1993-1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, Ward, J., and Taylor, J., eds. 1988. Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, Lyons, Nona P., and Hanmer, Trudy J. 1990. Making connections: The relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Wiliard School. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, Rogers, Annie G., and Tolman, Deborah L. 1991. Women, girls, and psychotherapy: Reframingresistance. New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1990. Postmodern blackness. Ii Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda. 1986. Some cautionary words for histotians. Signs 11(2): 304–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrabee, Mary Jeanne, ed. 1993. An ethicofcare: Feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leidner, Robin. 1991. Stretching the boundaries of liberalism: Democratic innovation in a feminist organization. Signs 16(2): 263–89.10.1086/494660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jane Roland. 1994. Methodological essentialism, false difference, and other dangerous traps. Signs 19(3): 630–57.10.1086/494915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1990. Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha, and Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1990. In context. Southern California Law Review 63(6): 597652.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda., ed. 1997. The second wave: A reader in feminist theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1994. An ethic of caring and its implications for instructional arrangements. Ii The education feminism reader, ed. Stone, Lynda. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1990. On resistance, ambivalence, and feminist theory: A response to Carol Gilligan. Michigan Quarterly Review v. 29: 537–46.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jill McLean, Gilligan, Carol, and Sullivan, Amy M. 1995. Between voice and silence: Women and girls, race and relationship. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar