Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T10:20:53.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motivating Coalition: Women of Color and Epistemic Disobedience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Shireen Roshanravan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay engages Chandra Mohanty, M. Jacqui Alexander, and María Lugones in a “plurilogue” to elaborate and exhibit a method that animates the differential mode of Women of Color politics while rendering more acute the strategies each scholar offers against the racialized, gendered oppressions of colonialism and global capitalism. Ella Shohat describes “a multifaceted plurilogue” as a “dissonant polyphony” that “links different yet co‐implicated constituencies and arenas of struggle” (Shohat 2001, 2). The emphasis on reading differences within Women of Color theorizing resists the homogenizing tendency of superficial engagement that glosses Women of Color scholarship as a unified genre of thought. A plurilogue thus pursues dissimilarities to clarify the conceptual interventions made within Women of Color theorizing and the relationship among the different patterns of oppression that each intervention exposes. Plurilogued engagements bring these conceptual strategies and understandings of multiple oppressions together, not to resolve or rank them, but to more effectively ascertain the complexities of, and varied coalitional strategies for, resisting the racialized, heteropatriarchal oppressions of global capitalism and colonialism.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 29 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Interstices: Inheriting Women of Color Feminist Philosophy , Winter 2014 , pp. 41 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

My compañeras in la Escuela Popular Norteña motivated and shaped the “why” and “with whom” of this plurilogue. Thank you to Laura DuMond Kerr, Cricket Keating and, especially, María Lugones for the deep, demanding and sustained political conversations. Thank you also to Lynn Fujiwara, Rocío Zambrana, Gaile Pohlhaus, Alexis Shotwell, Alison Bailey, Melisa Posey, Tushabe, Lisa Tatonetti, Michele Janette, Crista Lebens, Michael Hames‐García, Ernesto Martinez, Kristie Dotson and the anonymous reviewers at Hypatia.

References

Alexander, M. Jacqui. 1994. Not just (any) body can be a citizen: The politics of law, sexuality and postcoloniality in Trinidad and Tobago and the Bahamas. Feminist Review 48 (Autumn): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, M. Jacqui. 2005. Pedagogies of crossing: Meditations on feminism, sexual politics, memory, and the sacred. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, M. Jacqui, and Mohanty, Chandra. 1997. Introduction: Genealogies, legacies, movements. In Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures, ed. Jacqui Alexander, M. and Talpade Mohanty, Chandra. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, Barbara. 1990. The race for theory. In Making face, making soul/haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color, ed. Anzaldúa, Gloria. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
Dua, Ena, and Trotz, Alissa. 2002. Transnational pedagogy: Doing political work in women's studies: An interview with Chandra Talpade Mohanty. Atlantis 26 (2): 66–77.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister/outsider. Freedom, Calif.: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2003. Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2007. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia 22 (1): 186–219.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2010. Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia 25 (4): 742–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldonado‐Torres, Nelson. 2007. On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies 21 (2): 240–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. 2000. Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. 2009. Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and de‐colonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society 26 (7–8): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra. 2003. Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/ (accessed June 9, 2013).Google Scholar
Quijano, Aníbal. 2000. Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South 1 (3): 533–80.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 2000. Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Shohat, Ella. 2001. Introduction. In Talking visions: Multicultural feminism in a transnational age, ed. Shohat, Ella. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Andrea. 2004. Beyond the politics of inclusion: Violence against women of color and human rights. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 4 (2): 120–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Soto, Sandra. 2005. Where in the transnational world are U.S. women of color? In Women's studies for the future: Foundations, interrogations, politics, ed. Lapovsky Kennedy, Elizabeth. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Tlostanova, Madina. 2011. Gender epistemologies and Eurasian borderlands. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar