Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T16:43:14.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboring and Hanging Out in the Embodied In‐Between

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

In this essay I describe how my involvement in the political struggles of an immigrant domestic workers' collective inspired me to hang out not only with the workers, but also with the writings of María Lugones and Hannah Arendt. The essay invites the reader to engage in a playful rereading of Arendt's notion of the worldlessness of laboring in the private realm by putting her into dialogue with Lugones's notion of the hangout that defies the public–private split Arendt adamantly insists on in all her writings. By following the complex physical, mental, and emotional itineraries of immigrant domestic workers to, from, and in‐between a number of places and spaces, I demonstrate how their stories blur the line between public and private, and therefore also between the unfreedom of the body and the presumed escape into the political public. I describe the women's experiences as the living promise of a world that allows for an embodied fluid movement between labor, work, and the freedom “inherent in action” (Arendt 193, 153).

Type
Further Essays on Embodiment
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anders, Günther. 1995. Die Antiquierheit des Menschen. Munich: Beck Verlag.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1990. On revolution. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1993. Between past and future. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bauman, Whitney. 2003. Essentialism, universalism, and violence: Unpacking the ideology of patriarchy. Journal of Women and Religion 19/20: 5271.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1992. Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Grace. 2000. Disposable domestics: Immigrant women workers in the global economy. Cambridge, Mass.: South End Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Shu‐Ju Ada. 2006. Serving the household and the nation: Filipina domestics and the politics of identity in Taiwan. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Curtis, Kimberley F. 1995. Hannah Arendt, feminist theorizing, and the debate over new reproductive technologies. Polity 28 (2): 159–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, Mary. 1989. Purity and danger. London: Ark Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gamburd, Michele Ruth. 2000. The kitchen spoon's handle: Transnationalism and Sri Lanka's migrant housemaids. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Mechthild. 2002. The poverty of life‐affirming work: Motherwork, education, and social change. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gamburd, Michele Ruth. 2005. Women, migration, and the body‐less spirit of patriarchal capitalism. Journal of International Women's Studies 7 (2). http://www.bridgew.edu/SoAS/jiws/Nov05V2/Hart.pdf (accessed March 13, 2012).Google Scholar
Gamburd, Michele Ruth. 2010. Latinas and domestic caring work. In Latina Portraits, a project of Mujeres Latinas en Acción, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hidden in the home: Abuse of domestic workers with special visas in the United States. (June2001). Human Rights Watch 13 (2). http://www.hrw.org/node/89123/section/1 (accessed March 14, 2012).Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie. 2003. Love and gold. In Global Woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy, ed. Ehrenreich, Barbara and Russell Hochschild, Arlie. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Hondagneu‐Sotelo, Pierrette. 2001. Doméstica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1995. Toward an agonistic feminism: Hannah Arendt and the politics of identity. In Feminist interpretations of Hannah Arendt, ed. Honig, Bonnie. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Ibarra, María. 2002. Emotional proletarian in a global economy: Mexican immigrant women and elder care work. Urban Anthropology 31 (3–4): 317–50.Google Scholar
Ismail, Munira. 1999. Maids in space: Gendered domestic labour from Sri Lanka to the Middle East. In Gender, migration, and domestic service, ed. Momsen, Janet H.London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, Renate. 1999. The politics of cyberfeminism: If I'm a cyborg rather than a goddess will patriarchy go away? In Cyberfeminism: Connectivity, critique and creativity, ed. Hawthorne, Susan and Klein, Renate. North Melbourne: Spinifex Press.Google Scholar
Leavitt, Robin L., and Bauman, Martha. 1997. Civilizing bodies: Children in day care. In Making a place for pleasure in early childhood education, ed. Tobin, Joseph. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 1987. Playfulness, “world”‐traveling, and loving perception. Hypatia 2 (2): 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, María. 2003. Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1995. Conformism, housekeeping, and the attack of the Blob: The origins of Hannah Arendt's concept of the social. In Feminist interpretations of Hannah Arendt, ed. Honig, Bonnie. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Punpuing, Sureeporn, Caouette, Therese, Panam, Awatsaya, and Mar Kyaw Zaw, Khaing. 2008. Migrant domestic workers: From Burma to Thailand. http://www.ipsr.mahidol.ac.th/ipsr/Contents/Articles/2008/119-Migrant-Domestic.pdf (accessed March 14, 2012).Google Scholar
Rights begin at home: Protecting yourself as a domestic worker. 2010. http://www.nelp.org/page/-/Justice/2011/RightsBeginatHome.pdf. (accessed March 14, 2012).Google Scholar
Romero, Mary. 1992. Maid in the U.S.A. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rowe, Aimee Carillo. 2008. Power lines: On the subject of feminist alliances. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jeffrey M. 2007. Genetic roulette: The documented health risks of genetically engineered food. White River Jct., Vt.: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Werlhof, Claudia von. 2001. Losing faith in progress: Capitalist patriarchy as an “alchemical system.” In There is an alternative: Subsistence and worldwide resistance to corporate globalization, ed. Bennholdt‐Thomsen, Veronika, Faraclas, Nicolas and von Werlhof, Claudia. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Werlhof, Claudia von. 2007. Capitalist patriarchy and the negation of matriarchy. In Women and the gift economy: A radically different worldview is possible, ed. Vaughan, Genevieve. Toronto: Innana Publications.Google Scholar