Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:42:22.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I. Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2020

Adam Deville
Adam Deville*
Affiliation:
University of Saint Francis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

“How has the ecumenical movement changed in the twenty-five years since Ut Unum Sint was written?”

Keywords

ecumenismUt Unum SintJohn Paul IIpapacyWorld Council of ChurchesARCICOrthodox-Catholic relations
Type
Theological Roundtable
Information
Horizons , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , December 2020 , pp. 315 - 320
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © College Theology Society, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Regarding the targets of this hostility, see my chapter “Orientalium Ecclesiarum 50 Years On: Past Achievements and Future Attainments,” in Levering, Matthew and Lamb, Matthew L., eds., The Reception of Vatican II at 50: Retrospect and Prospect (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017): 324–46Google Scholar.

2 The late Jesuit historian Robert Taft gives the chronology and details of the near collapse of the official dialogue around the turn of the century in his article “The Problem of ‘Uniatism’ and the ‘Healing of Memories’: Anamnesis, not Amnesia,” Logos: A Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 41–42 (2000–2001): 155–94.

3 The lecture is quoted and discussed at length in Mattiussi, Richard, The Ratzinger Formula (Fairfax, VA: Eastern Christian Publications, 2010)Google Scholar.

4 See my “On the Patriarchate of the West,” Ecumenical Trends 35 (June 2006): 1–7.

5 See my “Ravenna and Beyond: The Roman Papacy and the Orthodox Churches: The State of the Question in the Literature: 1962–2006,” One in Christ 41 (2008): 99–138.

6 I analyzed the statement in “Francis and Kirill: Who Played Whom?” Catholic World Report, February 13, 2016, https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2016/02/13/francis-and-kirill-who-played-whom/.

7 See the patriarch quoted here: http://www.interfax-religion.com/print.php?act=news&id=3559; and more fully here: https://www.cirkev.cz/archiv/070830-accessibility-of-john-xxiii-mass-welcomed-by-moscow-orthodox-patriarch.

8 It may be found here: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_20180302_sinodalita_en.html.

9 See DeVille, A. A. J., Everything Hidden Shall Be Revealed: Ridding the Church of Abuses of Sex and Power (Brooklyn, NY: Angelico Press, 2019)Google Scholar.

10 About the events of 1946 and their aftermath, Daniel Galadza and I have edited a book, forthcoming late this year from Peeters: The Lviv Sobor of 1946: The Search for Truth and Reconciliation (in press).

11 See my “Dying for the Telephone Company: Towards a Theological Analysis of Ukrainian Nationalist Aspirations,” Southeastern Europe, special edition, forthcoming 2020.

12 Denysenko, Nicholas, The Orthodox Church in Ukraine: A Century of Separation (DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 I analyzed these requests for healing of memories in some detail in: “On the ‘Healing of Memories’: An Analysis of the Concept in Papal Documents in Light of Modern Psychotherapy and Recent Ecumenical Statements,” Eastern Churches Journal 11 (2004): 59–88.

14 See my “John Paul II: Diagnostician of Divisions and Doctor of Ecumenism,” Catholic World Report, May 24, 2020, https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2020/05/24/john-paul-ii-diagnostician-of-divisions-doctor-of-ecumenism/.