No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Teacher Blame as the Grammar of Public School Reform
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 July 2022
Abstract
Historical policy stories that situate teachers as the root cause of problems in public schools have long accompanied educational reforms, including No Child Left Behind. This article portrays the history of teacher blame as a defining component of the grammar of American educational reform. Nineteenth- and twentieth-century reformers identified teacher quality—a later trademark of NCLB—as a panacea for school improvement, but it remained an amorphous idea bound up in gendered and racialized assumptions. The historical results were a swirl of policies that increased standardization across the schools. This article concludes that teacher blame was a critical driver for federal intervention in local public education, and that the roots of that intervention extend far deeper than historians have allowed.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- History of Education Quarterly , Volume 62 , Special Issue 3: Special Issue on the 20th Anniversary of No Child Left Behind , August 2022 , pp. 291 - 311
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the History of Education Society
References
1 “Report of the Commissioner of Education,” in Report of the Secretary of the Interior, vol. 3 (Washington DC: Government Printing Office [hereafter GPO], 1881), xxi. United States Office of Education, Report of the Commissioner of Education for the Year 1879 (Washington DC: GPO, 1881), xxi.
2 US Department of Education, Meeting the Highly Qualified Teachers Challenge: The Secretary's Third Annual Report on Teacher Quality (Washington, DC: GPO, 2004), 1.
3 Diana D'Amico Pawlewicz, Blaming Teachers: Professionalization Policies and the Failure of Reform in American History (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2020), 16–42; Lorraine Smith Pangle and Thomas L. Pangle, The Learning of Liberty: The Educational Ideas of the American Founders (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1993). For the formation of common schools, see Carl F. Kaestle, Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780–1860 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1983).
4 Deborah Stone, Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, 3rd ed. (New York: W. W. Norton, 2011); David A. Rochefort and Roger W. Cobb, eds., The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1994); D'Amico Pawlewicz, Blaming Teachers.
5 Benjamin Fine, “Teachers Chided on Mathematics,” New York Times, June 4, 1956, 1.
6 Meyer, John W. and Rowan, Brian, “Institutional Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,” American Journal of Sociology 83, no. 2 (Sept. 1977), 340–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W., “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review 48, no. 2 (April 1983), 147–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Tyack, David and Tobin, William, “The ‘Grammar’ of Schooling: Why Has It Been so Hard to Change?,” American Educational Research Journal 31, no. 3 (Sept. 21, 1994), 454Google Scholar, https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031003453
8 “Current Criticism of the Public School System,” Los Angeles Times, July 20, 1888.
9 A Mere Parent, “Are High Schools Failing?,” New York Times, March 3, 1930, 12.
10 “Business Groups Censures Public Schools As Failing to Teach Rudiments of English,” New York Times, April 15, 1947, 27.
11 “Schools of U.S. Seen Failing in Basic Job,” New York Times, March 28, 1961, 28.
12 National Commission on Excellence in Education, A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform (Washington, DC: GPO, April 1983).
13 Lynda Richardson, “Public Schools Are Failing Brightest Students, a Federal Study Says,” New York Times, Nov. 5, 1993, 23.
14 “Full Text of Bush's Campaign Speech on Education,” New York Times, Nov. 2, 1999.
15 “Teachers and Teaching,” New York Times, Aug. 14, 1852, 2.
16 “Bad Teachers, and Why,” Atlanta Constitution, June 29, 1912.
17 Peter Drucker, The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society, 2nd ed. (New Brunswick, NJ: Routledge, 1992), 338.
18 Ellen Hoffman, “Ex-Pupils Give Teachers Bad Marks,” Washington Post, Nov. 26, 1968.
19 National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, What Matters Most: Teaching for America's Future. Report of the National Commission on Teaching & America's Future (New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, 1996), 14.
20 US Department of Education, Meeting the Highly Qualified Teachers Challenge, iii.
21 The Teaching Commission, Teaching at Risk: A Call to Action (New York: The Teaching Commission, 2004), 10, 21.
22 Strober, Myra H. and Tyack, David, “Why Do Women Teach and Men Manage? A Report on Research on Schools,” Signs 5, no. 3 (Spring 1980), 494–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nancy Hoffman, Woman's “True” Profession: Voices from the History of Teaching, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2003); Geraldine Jonçich Clifford, “Man/Woman/Teacher: Gender, Family, and Career in American Educational History,” in American Teachers: Histories of a Profession at Work, ed. Donald R. Warren (New York: Macmillan, 1989), 293–343.
23 Lawrence A. Cremin, ed., The Republic and the School: Horace Mann on the Education of Free Men (New York: Teachers College Press, 1957), 79, 87.
24 Horace Mann, A Few Thoughts on the Powers and Duties of Woman: Two Lectures (Syracuse, NY: Hall, Mills, and Company, 1853), 23.
25 For more on the gendered dynamics of school teaching, see Jackie M. Blount, Fit to Teach: Same-Sex Desire, Gender, and School Work in the Twentieth Century (New York: State University of New York Press, 2005); Myra H. Strober and David Tyack, “Why Do Women Teach and Men Manage?”; Patricia Anne Carter, “Everybody's Paid but the Teacher”: The Teaching Profession and the Women's Movement (New York: Teachers College Press, 2002).
26 Andrew Abbott, The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988); Eliot Freidson, Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994).
27 Burton J. Bledstein, The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America (New York: Norton, 1976); Daniel J. Walkowitz, Working with Class: Social Workers and the Politics of Middle-Class Identity (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999); Dee Garrison, Apostles of Culture: The Public Librarian and American Society, 1876–1920 (New York: Free Press, 1979); Nel Noddings, “Feminist Critiques in the Professions,” Review of Research in Education 16 (1990), 393–424, https://doi.org/10.2307/1167357; Witz, Anne, “Patriarchy and Professions: The Gendered Politics of Occupational Closure,” Sociology 24, no. 4 (Nov. 1990), 675–90Google Scholar.
28 “Shop Censures School,” New York Times, May 30, 1920, 10.
29 Joseph Mayer Rice, “Our Public-School System: Evils in Baltimore,” The Forum, Oct. 1892, 151, unz.org. Also see D'Amico Pawlewicz, Blaming Teachers, 50.
30 Joseph Mayer Rice, Scientific Management in Education (New York: Hinds, Noble and Eldredge, 1912), xii.
31 “Male or Female Principals,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 28, 1890, 4.
32 D'Amico Pawlewicz, Blaming Teachers, 41. For more on the profession, see Freidson, Professionalism Reborn; Andrew Abbott, The System of Professions; Witz, “Patriarchy and Professions”; JoAnne Brown, The Definition of a Profession: The Authority of Metaphor in the History of Intelligence Testing, 1890–1930 (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1992).
33 Agness Boysen, “The Principal and the Teacher,” Christian Science Monitor, Jan. 20, 1940.
34 Ervin Eugene Lewis, Personnel Problems of the Teaching Staff: A Study of Some of the Outstanding Personnel Management Problems That Arise in the Administration and Supervision of a Public School System (New York: The Century Co., 1925), 3.
35 Christine A. Ogren, The American State Normal School: An Instrument of Great Good (New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 2005).
36 “Way to Aid Youth Called Big Need As Teachers Meet ,” Christian Science Monitor, March 28, 1936, 2.
37 Benjamin Fine, “Qualities Listed of Good Teachers,” New York Times, July 3, 1948, 13.
38 Perrillo, Jonna, “Beyond ‘Progressive’ Reform: Bodies, Discipline, and the Construction of the Professional Teacher in Interwar America,” History of Education Quarterly 44, no. 4 (Fall 2004), 337–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kate Rousmaniere, City Teachers: Teaching and School Reform in Historical Perspective (New York: Teachers College Press, 1997).
39 “Trustee Wants Teacher Pay Based on Merit,” Los Angeles Times, Nov. 19, 1959, D1.
40 Mary Kelly, “Expenditures Point To Quality Education: High Quality Education Aid to Recruitment,” Christian Science Monitor, Dec. 28, 1957, 6.
41 Mary Herrick, Merit Rating: Dangerous Mirage or Master Plan (Chicago: American Federation of Teachers, 1958).
42 “Schools in Baltimore,” New York Times, Dec. 27, 1880, 1.
43 “Will Have to Try It Again: Fraud Discovered in Examination of Colored Teacher,” Atlanta Constitution, Sept. 6, 1901, 2.
44 “Nalle Case Up To-Day,” Washington Post, May 17, 1907, 13.
45 Hearing before Subcommittee of House Committee on Appropriations (Washington, DC: GPO, 1913), 460.
46 “71% of Negro Teachers Made Low Recertification Grades Greenwood Senator Reports,” Atlanta Daily World, April 4, 1945, 7.
47 Christina Collins, “‘Ethnically Qualified’”: Race, Merit, and the Selection of Urban Teachers, 1920–1980 (New York: Teachers College Press, 2011), 75–81.
48 Simon Anekwe, “HEW Investigates Board of Education's Treatment of Minorities,” New York Amsterdam News, April 7, 1976, A3.
49 “Barred Colored Teacher: Allegheny School Board Has a Case of the Color Line on Its Hands,” New York Times, Nov. 23, 1904, 5.
50 Mignon A. Jones, “Again Omit Negro Teacher: White Instructor Is Put in Lincoln Post School Has Ninety-Nine Per Cent Colored Enrollment with No Race Teachers,” New York Amsterdam News, Aug. 14, 1937, 10.
51 “Anti-bias Step Urged,” New York Times, May 9, 1947, 44.
52 For instance, see: Diana D'Amico et al., “Where Are All the Black Teachers? Discrimination in the Teacher Labor Market,” Harvard Educational Review 87, no. 1 (Spring 2017), 26–49; Brown, Erikca, “African American Teachers’ Experiences with Racial Micro-Aggressions,” Educational Studies 55, no. 2 (March 2019), 180–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
53 Andrea N. Guiden, “In Search of ‘the Right Type’: An Historical Examination of Black Teachers and Quality in the District of Columbia Public Schools, 1952–1964,” PhD diss., George Mason University, 2020.
54 Daniel Yi, “A Call to Raise the Bar in Classroom,” Los Angeles Times, April 13, 2003, B3.
55 Marguerite Roza, “It's the Teachers, Stupid,” Christian Science Monitor, April 19, 2001, 11.
56 Nick Anderson, “Paige Calls Teachers Union a ‘Terrorist Organization,’” Los Angeles Times, Feb. 24, 2004, A15.
57 US Department of Education, A Talented, Dedicated, and Well-Prepared Teacher in Every Classroom (Washington, DC: GPO, 1999), 3.
58 US Department of Education, Meeting the Highly Qualified Teachers Challenge, 2.
59 Rod Paige, Education in America: The Complacency Must End (National Press Club, Washington, DC: Sept. 24, 2003).
60 US Department of Education, State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, vol. 8, Teacher Quality Under NCLB: Final Report (Washington, DC: GPO, 2009).
61 The Teaching Commission, Teaching at Risk, 19.
62 RAND Corporation, “Evaluating Teacher Quality Under No Child Left Behind,” RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2007.
63 Lawrence Baines, “When ‘Highly Qualified’ Teachers Aren't,” Education Week, March 7, 2017, available online at https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/opinion-when-highly-qualified-teachers-arent/2017/03.
64 Nieto, Sonia, “Schools for a New Majority: The Role of Teacher Education in Hard Times,” New Educator 1, no. 1 (2005), 27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
65 Patrick J. McGuinn, No Child Left Behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy, 1965-2005, illustrated ed. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006), 9; Maris Vinovskis, From a Nation at Risk to No Child Left Behind: National Education Goals and the Creation of Federal Education Policy (New York: Teachers College Press, 2008); McDonald, Lorraine M., “No Child Left Behind and the Federal Role in Education: Evolution or Revolution?” Peabody Journal of Education 80, no. 2 (Nov. 2009), 19–38Google Scholar.
66 Jesse H. Rhodes, An Education in Politics: The Origin and Evolution of No Child Left Behind (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012); Gareth Davies, See Government Grow: Education Politics from Johnson to Reagan (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2007); Vinovskis, From a Nation at Risk to No Child Left Behind, 228.
67 Department of Education, Report of the Commissioner of Education, with Circulars and Documents Accompanying the Same, Submitted to the Senate and House of Representatives June 2, 1868 (Washington, DC: GPO), 1868), ix.
68 Annual Report of the Commissioner of Education for the Year 1874 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1875), v.
69 Report of the Commissioner of Education . . . June 2, 1868, 651.
70 Report of the Commissioner of Education . . . June 2, 1868, 702.
71 US Education Office, Ten-Year Aims in Education, Staffing and Constructing Public Elementary and Secondary Schools, 1959–1969 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1961), 3.
72 US Education Office, Ten-Year Aims in Education, 5.
73 Lyndon B. Johnson, “Toward Full Educational Opportunity,” Jan. 12, 1965, in James W. Fraser, ed., The School in the United States: A Documentary History, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2009), 319–21.
74 “National Teacher Corps Urged to Aid Children in Poor Areas,” New York Times, June 12, 1965, 33.
75 Rogers, Bethany, “‘Better’ People, Better Teaching: The Vision of the National Teacher Corps, 1965–1968,” History of Education Quarterly 49, no. 3 (Aug. 2009), 348CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
76 US Department of Education, No Child Left Behind: A Toolkit for Teachers (Washington, DC: GPO, 2003), 6. See the full document at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED480850.pdf.
77 For the quote from Kati Haycock's report for The Education Trust, see Haycock, “Good Teaching Matters . . . a Lot,” OAH Magazine of History 13, no. 1 (Fall 1998), 62.
78 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 101, Stat. 1425 (2002).
79 See, for instance, Gail L. Sunderman et al., Listening to Teachers: Classroom Realities and No Child Left Behind (Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University, 2004); Meredith Wronowski and Angela Urick, “Teacher and School Predictors of Teacher Deprofessionalization and Demoralization in the United States,” Educational Policy 35, no. 5 (May 2019), 679–720.
80 Fernanda Santos, “Teacher Survey Shows Morale Is at Low Point,” New York Times, March 7, 2012, 13.
81 Jason A. Grissom, Sean Nicholson-Crotty, and James R. Harrington, “Estimating the Effects of No Child Left Behind on Teachers’ Work Environments and Job Attitudes,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 36, no. 4 (Dec. 2014), 417–36.
82 A. Teacher, “Proposed Re-examination of the School Teachers,” New York Daily Times, July 13, 1854, 3.
83 Benjamin Fine, “Teacher Morale Ebbing in Nation,” New York Times, Feb. 15, 1947, 17.
84 Austin Lee, “CTA Sharply Critical of Pasadena District: Report Charges Schools Are Poorly Run and Teacher Morale Is at All-Time Low,” Los Angeles Times, April 10, 1973, 6.
85 Charisse Jones, “School Cuts Take Big Toll on Teachers’ Morale: Education: School Officials, Teachers and Parents Say the Most Trying School Year in Memory Is About to Begin,” Los Angeles Times, Aug. 16, 1992, A3.