Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T16:57:22.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supply and Demand: The “Two Histories” of English Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Sheldon Rothblatt
Sheldon Rothblatt*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , Winter 1988 , pp. 627 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a sophisticated discussion of market operations, see Tom R. Burns and Helena Flam, The Shaping of Social Organization: Social Rule System Theory with Applications (London, 1987), ch. 2.Google Scholar

2 Ringer, Fritz K., Education and Society in Modern Europe (Bloomington and London, 1979).Google Scholar

3 Bryant, Margaret, The Unexpected Revolution, A Study in the History of the Education of Women and Girls in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1979).Google Scholar

4 Hans, Nicholas, New Trends in Education in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1951).Google Scholar

5 Sheldon Rothblatt, See, “Historical and Comparative Remarks on the Federal Principle in Higher Education,” in History of Education 16 (Sept. 1987): 151–80.Google Scholar

6 “Amiable tolerance” can also mean voluntary social classes, religious, ethnic, and racial separatism, e.g., the coexistence in English public schools and Oxbridge colleges of rowing hearties and hard-working, serious “quizzes,” without much in the way of communication occurring. For a report on contemporary America, see the New York Times, 26 May 1988.Google Scholar