Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T17:54:40.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Southern Education in Transition: William Waugh Smith, the Carnegie Foundation, and the Methodist Church

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Robert A. Hohner*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario

Extract

The South has long represented a distinct and enduring subculture in American society. Its uniqueness stems in part from the overwhelming strength of evangelical Protestantism in the region, a monolithic religious presence unmatched elsewhere in the United States, save in Utah. At the turn of the twentieth century, the pervasive influence of the Methodist and Baptist denominations was even more pronounced than it is today. The intense religiosity of southern society and culture contributed significantly to the failure of southern higher education to conform to the pattern of change characteristic of other regions after the Civil War. Elsewhere, secular ideals of utility and research displaced the older educational values of piety and mental discipline and outdistanced the rival conception of liberal culture, and universities eclipsed colleges in importance. In contrast, colleges continued to dominate education in the South, and the higher learning there adhered to a different philosophy, liberal Christian education, a distinctive amalgam which remained committed to the central importance of religious and moral principles.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Reed, John Shelton, The Enduring South: Subcultural Persistence in Mass Society (Lexington, Mass., 1972), xix, 57–68, 87. Southern religion has been characterized by a homogeneity unknown elsewhere (except, for the Morman church in Utah) and an orthodoxy that has transcended denominational boundaries. Hill, Samuel S. Jr., Southern Churches in Crisis (New York, 1966), 20–39.Google Scholar

2. Grantham, Dewey W., Southern Progressivism: The Reconciliation of Progress and Tradition (Knoxville, Tenn., 1983), 1424. See also Vann Woodward, C., Origins of the New South, 1877–1913 (Baton Rouge, La., 1951), 448–52.Google Scholar

3. On these themes, see Stetar, Joseph M., “In Search of a Direction: Southern Higher Education after the Civil War,” History of Education Quarterly 25 (Fall 1985): 341–67.Google Scholar

4. On the new university ideal, see Rudolph, Frederick, The American College and University: A History (New York, 1962), 264–86, 329–54. Veysey, Laurence R. identifies the major competing conceptions of the university in The Emergence of the American University (Chicago, 1965), 1–18, 57–251.Google Scholar

5. On the Vanderbilt controversy, see Conkin, Paul K., Gone with the Ivy: A Biography of Vanderbilt University (Knoxville, Tenn., 1985), 149–84. See also Mims, Edwin, History of Vanderbilt University (Nashville, Tenn., 1946; New York, 1977), 291–318; and Gross, John O., “The Bishops versus Vanderbilt University,” Tennessee Historical Quarterly 22 (Mar. 1963): 53–65.Google Scholar

6. Wall, Joseph Frazier, Andrew Carnegie (New York, 1970), 871–77.Google Scholar

7. Candler, Warren A. to Cannon, James Jr., 24 Feb. 1908, box 1, James Cannon, Jr., Papers, William R. Perkins Library, Duke University, Durham, N.C.Google Scholar

8. Wilson, Alpheus W. to Denny, Collins, 3 Nov. 1909, accession no. 2672-e, box 5, Collins Denny Papers, Alderman Library, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va. Google Scholar

9. Wall, , Andrew Carnegie, 874–76; Rudolph, , American College and University, 433.Google Scholar

10. Chartered by the Virginia legislature in 1830, Randolph-Macon College was originally located at Boydton, in Mecklenburg County. In 1868 the college moved to Ashland, north of Richmond. During the last decade of the nineteenth century Smith and the trustees created an educational system, adding preparatory academies at Bedford City in 1890 and Front Royal in 1892, a woman's college in Lynchburg in 1893, and a preparatory institute for girls at Danville in 1897. Scanlon, James Edward, Randolph-Macon College: A Southern History, 1825–1967 (Charlottesville, Va., 1983), 3032, 117–20, 124–33, 199–203, 208–10.Google Scholar

11. Smith's personal papers are not extant, and little has been written about him. For a brief sketch, see Dictionary of American Biography, s.v. “Smith, William Waugh.” Appreciative appraisals may be found in S. T. M. Harmanson, “Recollections of Dr. W. W. Smith,” Bulletin of Randolph-Macon Woman's College 4 (Oct.-Dec. 1917): 313; and Blackwell, R. E., “Dr. William Waugh Smith: A Portrait,” Alumnae Bulletin, Randolph-Macon Woman's College 24 (Apr. 1931): 9–15.Google Scholar

12. Lipscomb, Bernard F. to Cannon, , 3 Apr. 1890, box 1, Cannon Papers.Google Scholar

13. Lipscomb, to Cannon, , 31 Mar. 1892, ibid. Google Scholar

14. Cornelius, Roberta D., The History of Randolph-Macon Woman's College: From the Founding in 1891 through the Year of 1949–50 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1951), 31.Google Scholar

15. Cox, Samuel K., “The Woman's College, &c.,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 23 June 1904, 2. Smith was president of both Randolph-Macon College and Randolph-Macon Woman's College until 1897, when he resigned as head of the Ashland school and became chancellor of the entire system. Scanlon, Randolph-Macon College, 219, 222.Google Scholar

16. Cannon, James Jr., deposition, 12 Nov. 1912, E.D. Newman and Others v. Trustees of Randolph-Macon College and Others, Depositions for Defendants taken at Lynchburg, Va., on 12, 13, and 14 Nov. 1912, Circuit Court of Hanover County, Va., p. 52, box 42, Cannon Papers.Google Scholar

17. By 1906 the Lynchburg school had 350 students, a faculty and staff of 43, a physical plant valued at over $300,000, and an endowment of over $200,000. Virginia Annual Conference, Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Portsmouth, Va., 14–19 Nov. 1906, Minutes (Richmond, Va., 1906), 91.Google Scholar

18. Dictionary of American Biography, s.v. “Smith, William Waugh.”Google Scholar

19. Cornelius, , Randolph-Macon Woman's College, 108. Also included in the top category were Radcliffe, Smith, Mount Holyoke, Wellesley, Barnard, Vassar, and Bryn Mawr.Google Scholar

20. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, First Annual Report of the President and Treasurer (n.p., 1906), 25. Tulane University also qualified on the basis of requirements to be implemented the following year.Google Scholar

21. Beckham, Benjamin M. to Smith, , 9 Oct. 1908, Randolph-Macon Woman's College Archives, Herbert C. Lipscomb Library, Randolph-Macon Woman's College, Lynchburg, Va. Google Scholar

22. Smith to the Executive Committee, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 17 July 1906, enclosure, Exhibit B, Correspondence Files, Office of the Secretary, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar

23. Smith circular letter, [ca. 1902], Denny Papers.Google Scholar

24. Smith to the Executive Committee, Carnegie Foundation, 17 July 1906, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

25. Lagemann, Ellen Condliffe, Private Power for the Public Good: A History of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (Middletown, Conn., 1983), 2123, 32–36, 39–41.Google Scholar

26. Dictionary of American Biography, s.v. “Pritchett, Henry Smith”; Wall, , Andrew Carnegie, 873, 876.Google Scholar

27. Graebner, William, “The Origins of Retirement in Higher Education: The Carnegie Pension System” Academe 65 (Mar. 1979): 99; Cannon, James Jr., “The Atlanta Meeting,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 4 June 1908, 1.Google Scholar

28. Pritchett, to Smith, , 11 July 1906, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation. Pritchett obviously excluded Vanderbilt because of its church affiliation.Google Scholar

29. Smith, to Pritchett, , 13 July 1906, ibid. Google Scholar

30. Smith to the Executive Committee, Carnegie Foundation, 17 July 1906, ibid. Google Scholar

31. Cornelius, , Randolph-Macon Woman's College, 34.Google Scholar

32. Smith, to Pritchett, , 13 July 1906, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

33. Smith to the Executive Committee, Carnegie Foundation, 17 July 1906, enclosure, Exhibit B, ibid.Google Scholar

34. Smith, to Pritchett, and Vanderlip, Frank A., 10 Oct. 1905, ibid. Google Scholar

35. Smith to the Executive Committee, Carnegie Foundation, 17 July 1906, enclosure, Exhibit B, ibid. Google Scholar

36. Pritchett, to Carnegie, Andrew, 9 Feb. 1907, Henry Smith Pritchett Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

37. Pritchett, to Smith, , 28 July 1906, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

38. Pritchett, to Smith, , 8 Aug. 1906, ibid. Google Scholar

39. Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 16 Aug. 1906, 57, Office of the Treasurer, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, Va. Google Scholar

40. Pritchett, to Smith, , 23 Jan. 1907, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

41. Pritchett, to Smith, , 8 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

42. Pritchett, to Smith, , 18 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

43. Pritchett, to Smith, , 23 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

44. Smith, to Pritchett, , 21 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

45. Smith, to Pritchett, , 18 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

46. Smith, to Pritchett, , 28 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

47. Smith, to Pritchett, , 24 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

48. Smith, to Butler, Nicholas Murray, 15 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

49. Smith, to Pritchett, , 18 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

50. Morris Carnegie, T. to Pritchett, , 24 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

51. Pritchett, to Morris Carnegie, T., 26 Jan. 1907, ibid. Google Scholar

52. Pritchett, to Granbery, John C., 28 Sept. 1906, ibid.; Granbery to Pritchett, 4 Oct. 1906, in Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Second Annual Report of the President and Treasurer (New York, 1907), 13; Pritchett to Smith, 23 Jan. 1907, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

53. Smith, to Pritchett, , 23 Mar. 1907, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

54. Pritchett, to Smith, , 29 Mar. 1907, ibid.; Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Executive Committee, Minutes, 9 May 1906-30 Sept. 1909, 40, Office of the Secretary, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar

55. Smith, to Pritchett, , 1 Apr. 1907, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

56. Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 12 June 1907, 106.Google Scholar

57. Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 20 June 1907, 10.Google Scholar

58. Richmond, Times-Dispatch, 30 June 1907.Google Scholar

59. Nashville, Christian Advocate, 26 July 1907, 12.Google Scholar

60. Richmond, Times-Dispatch, 21 Nov. 1907.Google Scholar

61. On Cannon's life and career, see Hohner, Robert A., “Dry Messiah Revisited: Bishop James Cannon, Jr.,” in The South Is Another Land, ed. Clayton, Bruce L. and Salmond, John A. (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

62. Cannon, James Jr., “The Relation of Randolph-Macon to the Virginia Conference,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 31 Oct. 1907, 2.Google Scholar

63. Cannon, James Jr., “Editorial Comment,” 26 Mar. 1908, Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 12.Google Scholar

64. Cannon, James Jr., “Ownership Involves Responsibility and Obligation,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 23 Sept. 1909, 4.Google Scholar

65. Smith, to Pritchett, , 19 Nov. 1907, enclosure no. 1, “Summary of Argument,” Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

66. Virginia Annual Conference, Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Petersburg, Va., 13–20 Nov. 1907, Minutes (Richmond, Va., 1907), 69.Google Scholar

67. Cannon, James Jr., “Denominational Education, the Carnegie Foundation, and the Randolph-Macon System,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 12 Mar. 1908, 5.Google Scholar

68. Smith, William Waugh, “Facts as to Randolph-Macon,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 26 Mar. 1908, 5.Google Scholar

69. Cannon, James Jr., “Editorial Comment,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 26 Mar. 1908, 16.Google Scholar

70. Candler, to Denny, , 14 Apr. 1908, accession no. 2672-e, box 1, Denny Papers.Google Scholar

71. Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 10–11 June 1908, 150, 120–21, 123, 155–56.Google Scholar

72. Cannon, James Jr., “Editorial Comment,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 30 July 1908, 6; idem, “Randolph-Macon Board of Trustees Takes Action,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 18 June 1908, 4–7.Google Scholar

73. Cannon, James Jr., “Editorial Comment,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 13 Aug. 1908, 10.Google Scholar

74. Smith to Bowman, John G., 8 Oct. 1908, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

75. Smith, William Waugh, Dr. Smith's Reply (n.p., [1908]), 16, located in Randolph-Macon Woman's College Archives, Herbert C. Lipscomb Library.Google Scholar

76. Pritchett to Newman, 17 Oct. 1908, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

77. Pritchett, to Newman, , 30 Oct. 1908, ibid. Google Scholar

78. Smith, to Pritchett, , 21 Mar. 1909, ibid. Google Scholar

79. Blackwell, R. E. to Bertram, James, 16 Mar. 1909, Robert E. Blackwell Papers, Walter Hines Page Library, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, Va. Google Scholar

80. The Baltimore Conference, which included within its boundaries much of northern and western Virginia, provided one-third of the membership of the Randolph-Macon board. Smith, William Waugh, admission form to Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 25 June 1908, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

81. Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 8 June 1909, 166, 197–98.Google Scholar

82. Bond, B.W. to Denny, , 10 June 1909 and 26 June 1909, accession no. 2672-e, box 12, Wilson to Denny, 3 Nov. 1909, accession no. 2672-e, box 5, Denny Papers.Google Scholar

83. Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 9 June 1909, 168, 199–200.Google Scholar

84. Anderson, John A. to Denny, , 14 June 1909, accession no. 2672-e, box 6, Denny Papers.Google Scholar

85. Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 9 June 1909, 170.Google Scholar

86. Ibid. Google Scholar

87. Newman, to Pritchett, , 6 Sept. 1909, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

88. Newman, to Pritchett, , 25 June 1909, ibid. Google Scholar

89. Newman, to Blackwell, R. F., 21 June 1909, Blackwell Papers.Google Scholar

90. Hatcher, Samuel C. deposition, 13 Nov. 1912, Newman v. Trustees, p. 320, box 42, Cannon Papers.Google Scholar

91. Smith, to Butler, Nicholas Murray, 8 Oct. 1909, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation. Smith estimated that he had raised at least $800,000 for the Randolph-Macon system from all sources.Google Scholar

92. Smith, to Sheffey, E. F., 23 Aug. 1909, in Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 26 Oct. 1909, 214–15.Google Scholar

93. Smith, to Butler, Nicholas Murray, 8 Oct. 1909, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

94. Newman, to Pritchett, , 25 June 1909, ibid. Google Scholar

95. Newman, to Pritchett, , 24 Sept. 1909, ibid. Google Scholar

96. Smith, to Butler, Nicholas Murray, 25 Sept. 1909, ibid. Google Scholar

97. Pritchett, to Newman, , 15 Sept. 1909, ibid. Google Scholar

98. Newman, to Pritchett, , 29 Sept. 1909, ibid. Google Scholar

99. Carnegie Foundation, Executive Committee, Minutes, 9 May 1906–30 Sept. 1909, 137.Google Scholar

100. Smith, to Pritchett, , 28 Oct. 1909, and Newman to Pritchett, 2 Nov. 1909, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundationand Newman to Pritchett, 2 Nov. 1909, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

101. Newman, to Pritchett, , 6 Sept. 1909, and Smith, to Butler, , 25 Sept. 1909, ibid.Google Scholar

102. Hatcher deposition, 13 Nov. 1912, Newman v. Trustees, p. 280, box 42, Cannon Papers.Google Scholar

103. Smith, to Sheffey, , 23 Aug. 1909, in Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 26 Oct. 1909, 214–15; Craddock, Charles G. to Pritchett, , 20 Sept. 1909, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

104. Bond, to Denny, , 27 Oct. 1909, accession no. 2672-e, box 12, Denny Papers.Google Scholar

105. Smith, William Waugh, The History of Randolph-Macon Woman's College: Its Present Condition and Outlook (n.p., [1909]), 35, 7, 9–10, 12, Randolph-Macon Woman's College Archives, Herbert C. Lipscomb Library.Google Scholar

106. Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 26 Oct. 1909, 208–9.Google Scholar

107. Smith, to Butler, , 29 Oct. 1909, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

108. Smith, to Pritchett, , 28 Oct. 1909, ibid. Google Scholar

109. Bond to Denny, 16 July 1909, accession no. 2672-e, box 12, Denny Papers; Virginia Annual Conference, Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Newport News, Va., 10–16 Nov. 1909, Minutes (Richmond, Va., 1909), 7374.Google Scholar

110. Cannon, James Jr., “An Editorial Review of Dr. Smith's New and Revised Edition of ‘The History of Randolph-Macon Woman's College—Its Present Condition and Outlook,’” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 4 Nov. 1909, 9.Google Scholar

111. Cannon, James Jr., “Dr. Smith's Answer to Other Questions,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 16 Nov. 1911, 5.Google Scholar

112. Daily Christian Advocate, 18 May 1910, 99.Google Scholar

113. Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 7 June 1910, 224, 233, 226.Google Scholar

114. Cannon, to Denny, , 26 Aug. 1910, accession no. 2672-e, box 2, Denny Papers.Google Scholar

115. Cannon, James Jr., “The Present Status of the Randolph-Macon Question,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 28 Sept. 1911, 45.Google Scholar

116. Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 5 Oct. 1911, 287, 289, 292.Google Scholar

117. Smith, to Plimpton, George A., 23 Oct. 1911, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

118. Smith, to Pritchett, , 4 Dec. 1911, ibid. Google Scholar

119. Smith, William Waugh, letter to the editor, n.d., in Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 2 Nov. 1911, 4.Google Scholar

120. Injunction, 11 June 1912, Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Va., in Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1906–13, 12 June 1912, 318.Google Scholar

121. Cannon, James Jr., “Leaves from My Note Book,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 12 Sept. 1912; Newman v. Trustees, passim; Richmond Virginian, 24 May 1913.Google Scholar

122. Opinion and Final Order, Newman v. Trustees, 17 Sept. 1913, in Randolph-Macon College, Board of Trustees, Minutes, 1914–22, 10 June 1914, 3749.Google Scholar

123. Cannon, James Jr., Bishop Cannon's Own Story: Life As I Have Seen It, ed. Watson, Richard L. Jr. (Durham, N.C., 1955), 93.Google Scholar

124. Smith, to Plimpton, , 15 Nov. 1911, Correspondence Files, Carnegie Foundation; Cannon deposition, 14 Nov. 1912, Newman v. Trustees, p. 371, box 42, Cannon Papers.Google Scholar

125. Editorial, Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 5 Dec. 1912, 3.Google Scholar

126. Cannon, James Jr., “Leaves from My Note Book,” Baltimore and Richmond Christian Advocate, 19 Dec. 1912, 8.Google Scholar

127. Under the aegis of the Methodist church Randolph-Macon Woman's College flourished as a regional college of high quality. After Smith's death, however, it never fulfilled his dream of becoming an institution of national stature. In 1953 the Woman's College separated from the rest of the Randolph-Macon system, to be governed by an independent board. The Virginia Conference, however, still retained the power of confirmation of its trustees. Scanlon, , Randolph-Macon College, 370–74.Google Scholar