Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:06:55.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Do We Do with Irregular Correspondences? The Case of the Khoe Languages*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

Rainer Vossen
Rainer Vossen*
Affiliation:
Universität Bayreuth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is nothing that cannot be related directly or indirectly to anything else, and it is this nightmare that is horrifying. There seems to be no precedent for this sort of chaos in the languages of the world… (Traill 1974:251)

Regularity of phonological change is considered a basic principle of historico-linguistic reconstruction. In 1876 A. Leskien of the Leipzig school of neogrammarians formulated the postulate of sound change occurring without exception, meaning “that if one assembled all the facts, and analyzed them accurately and thoroughly, one could state exceptionless principles or laws for the development of language” (Lehmann 1973:87). However, it has since been argued on the basis of empirical research that languages are never in complete balance and that, therefore, change is not necessarily constant, nor parallel among groups speaking different languages. Various reasons have been found to account for irregularities in language: the impact of one language on another, the effect of children acquiring their language, etc. Yet before we enter into any etiological discussion of irregular or unstructured phonological change, the area of investigation for the present case study must be introduced, and the characteristic of the problematic nature of the case sketched.

Type
Research Article
Information
History in Africa , Volume 18 , 1991 , pp. 359 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am indebted to Professors Franz Rottland, Edwin N. Wilmsen, and participants at the international symposium on “African Protohistory,” held during 22-24 April 1989 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper. Special thanks are due to my colleague Klaus Keuthmann, who designed the maps herein. I also wish to express my sincere gratitude to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, which generously sponsored both my extensive fieldwork in Botswana (between 1983 and 89) and my attendance at the Illinois symposium.

References

Denbow, J. R. and Wilmsen, E. N. 1986. “Advent and Course of Pastoralism in the Kalahari.” Science 234: 1509–15.Google Scholar
Ehret, C. 1986. “Proposals on Khoisan Reconstruction.” Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7/2:105–30.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1963. The Languages of Africa. The Hague.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1982. Explanation in Phonology. Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, O. 1962. “Studien zum Genussystem und Verbalbau der zentralen Khoisan-Sprachen.” Anthropos 57: 529–46.Google Scholar
Köhler, O. 1966. “Die Wortbeziehungen zwischen der Sprache der Kxoe-Buschmänner und dem Hottentottischen als geschichtliches Problem.” In Lukas, J., ed., Neue Afrikanistische Studien. Festschrift August Klingenheben, Hamburg, 144–65.Google Scholar
Köhler, O. 1971. “Die ‘Krankheit’ im Denken der Kxoe-Buschmänner.” In Cyffer, N.et al., eds., Afrikanische Sprachen und Kulturen—ein Querschnitt. Hamburg, 317–25.Google Scholar
Köhler, O. 1973. “Die rituelle Jagd bei den Kxoe-Buschmännern von Mutsiku.” In Tauchmann, K., ed., Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Helmut Petri. Cologne, 215–57.Google Scholar
Köhler, O. 1973/1974. “Neuere Ergebnisse und Hypothesen der Sprachforschung in ihrer Bedeutung für die Geschichte Afrikas.” Paideuma 19/20: 162–99.Google Scholar
Köhler, O. 1978/1979. “Tierzauber und Krankheit bei den Kxoe-Buschmännern.” Afrika und Übersee 61: 35–58.Google Scholar
Köhler, O. 1981. “Les langues khoisan.” In Perrot, J., ed., Les langues dans le monde ancien et moderne. Paris, 455–615.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. 1973. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. 2d ed. New York.Google Scholar
Leskien, A. 1876. Die Deklination im Slavisch-Litauischen und Germanischen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Paul, H. 1898. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 3d ed. Halle.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris. English translation Course in General Linguistics. New York, 1959.Google Scholar
Traill, A. 1973. “‘N4 or S7?’: Another Bushman language.” African Studies 32: 25–32.Google Scholar
Traill, A. 1974. “Westphal on ‘N4 or S7?’: A reply.” African Studies 33: 249–55.Google Scholar
Traill, A. 1986a. “Do the Khoi Have a Place in the San? New Data on Khoisan Linguistic Relationships.” Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7/1: 407–30.Google Scholar
Traill, A. 1986b. “Click replacement in Khoe.” In Vossen, R. and Keuthmann, K., eds., Contemporary Studies on Khoisan, 2: 301–20. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Traill, A. n.d. Unpublished field notes.Google Scholar
Traill, A. and Vossen, R. 1984. “Correspondence.” KSIG Newsletter, no. 2 (June 1984), 14–18.Google Scholar
Vossen, R. 1984. “Studying the Linguistic and Ethno-History of the Khoe-Speaking (Central Khoisan) Peoples of Botswana: Research in Progress.” Botswana Notes and Records 16:19–35.Google Scholar
Vossen, R.et al. 1988a. “Khoe Linguistic Relationships Reconsidered.” Botswana Notes and Records 20: 67–70.Google Scholar
Vossen, R. 1988b. “Khoe Linguistic Relationships Reconsidered: the Data.” In Vossen, R., ed., New Perspectives on the Study of Khoisana. Hamburg, 67–108.Google Scholar
Westphal, E. O. J. 1971. “The Click Languages of Southern and Eastern Africa.” In Sebeok, Th. A., ed., Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Hague, 367–420.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, J. H. 1921/1922. “Aus dem Wortschatz der !kun und Hukwe-Buschmannsprache.” Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen 12: 291–304.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, E.N. 1989. Land Filled with Flies: A Political Economy of the Kalahari. Chicago.Google Scholar
Winter, J. C. 1981. “Die Khoisan-Familie.” In Heine, B., Schadeberg, T. C., and Wolff, E., eds., Die Sprachen Afrikas. Hamburg, 329–74.Google Scholar